User talk:Adakiko/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Zahamey

See their last edits:[Special:Contributions/Zahamey]. ANI? Plenty of warnings with no effect. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Do you understand AFL content?

You don't need fricken citations for a sports result. Every time you revert the page you add so much clutter. You make the pages look bad so stop 49.198.107.192 (talk) 15:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Do you understand wp:verifiability? Adakiko (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

MAP OF THE STATES OF SOMALIA

As the article clearly states the federal government of Somalia have no jurisdiction over the Republic of Somaliland so why do you insist of replacing my accurate map with the misleading one? Reverting my map with your false information to fit the agenda you’re pushing on behalf of Somalia is a clear violation of everyone’s right to accurate information JohnDOE73388 (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

@JohnDOE73388: You need to clearly state your reasoning in an wp:Edit summary. I'm not interested in spending time researching what you can easily add in the ES. Adakiko (talk) 15:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

I have added a summary several times and yet you continue to revert my edits. If you continue to do so I will have no choice but to report your account for gross negligence. spreading false information under the pretence — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnDOE73388 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


Bro, I'm fixing Pashtun article and you're messing it up. Those citations are dead and to defunct news paper, and the information (7 million Pashtuns) plainly conflicts with other reports.

"ANP leader Shahi Syed has laid claim to four million Pakhtuns in Karachi. Does he include all the three categories?" https://tribune.com.pk/story/43827/the-pakhtun-in-karachi In such situation we just omit the 7 million.

HabibKhosti (talk) 15:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Heathen Holidays

Please stop reverting my changes, I have references embedded in my changes, which is Our Troth Vol 3 Heathen Life Sandpiper912 (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Please avoid using wp:primary sources. A page number would be helpful. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 21:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Australian cricket team against Pakistan in the UAE in 2009

I have made significant removals to this article to remove the supposed 6th and 7th ODIs and the 2nd to 5th T20Is. These matches did not exist, even in any planned form. They were added malevolently by User:115.96.197.111 on 3 August 2022. User:203.212.244.144 removed these changes on 5 August, but User:General Ization reverted this removal the same day. User:115.96.128.116 removed the changes on 17 August 2022, but User:Adakiko reverted this removal the same day.

There was no 6th & 7th ODI or 2nd to 5th T20Is. They should never had been added. As evidence of their non−existence I adduce Cricket Archive and Cricinfo.FieldOfWheat (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

@FieldOfWheat: Several things do not add up here. First of all, 15.96.197.111 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has made no edits on Wikipedia. Perhaps you meant 115.96.197.111 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Secondly, nearly all, if not all, of the edits by 203.212.244.144 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) were very clearly vandalism, though I suppose it is possible they made a handful of constructive edits before going on a vandalism spree. If so, those constructive edits were probably undone in reverting the corpus of that vandal's edits. I will defer to Adakiko to explain their reversion, though 115.96.128.116 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) did not provide any explanation for their removals, and unexplained changes removals, especially by IPs, are generally reverted. I have no particular expertise with regard to cricket, so am hoping that Adakiko will have and will be in a position to validate your edits. General Ization Talk 21:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
And I see you corrected your comment to refer to 115.96.197.111 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). General Ization Talk 21:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I corrected my comment not long after I posted it. Strange as it may be the edits by User:203.212.244.144 were constructive in between the tide of vandalism. All this aside, it is quite clear from all credible sources (if I had my 2010 Wisden to hand I'd cite that too) that there never were any 6th or 7th ODI or 2nd to 5th T20Is so all mention of them are fiction. FieldOfWheat (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@FieldOfWheat and General Ization: I reverted 115.96.128.116's edits as I did not understand the reason for removal nor did I want to spend time researching as to why it might have been removed. The edit summary box is there for that and reasons. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 02:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
So, @FieldOfWheat, it seems that neither Adakiko nor I are in any position to challenge your edits, and I thank you for making them but also for letting us know why you have made them. General Ization Talk 03:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments User:Adakiko and User:General Ization I highlight it was never any criticism of you or your editing skills. FieldOfWheat (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Mike Stroud revisions

Hi Thanks for looking at my recent edits. I have no specific sources to cite but I am actually Mike Stroud so I am simply recounting what I have done.

Best wishes

Mike Stroum66 (talk) 09:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

I beg your pardon?

You kindly left a message on my Talk page:

"That links to the German Wikipedia page. Suggest reading the documentation of that template on [[{{{1}}}]] [] Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)"

Forgive me, but I have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you can clarify to what "That" refers. When you start a sentence with "That" in the manner in which you did on my Talk page, it behooves you to explain what "That" is or what it is referencing. The way you wrote it suggests that you and I were in a real-time conversation where I would have easily understood your meaning. I am sure you have an excellent point, I would just like to understand it. Thanks so much. 69.180.218.186 (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Replied on user talk:69.180.218.186. Adakiko (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. Red links should not exist when they link to pages that do not exist and will likely never be made. Because the German article does exist I will leave the red link. I wonder if you are German, yourself. If you are, I would like to encourage you to create the English article of the subject to which you have shown an interest and translate the German article into English. I would be happy to edit the English article when you are finished. I am unfamiliar with the people in this article, but I do hope you will create the English article for this woman's husband, if he deserves one. Let me know if I can help. All the best. MarydaleEd (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Whack!

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

For shooting yourself in the foot! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Mavka new release date

Thanks to Mavka’s new English trailer, it’s clear that the new release date is March 2 2023 and needs to be on this list of animated movies of 2023 174.102.128.102 (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are referring to. I make many edits. If a wp:reliable source is available, please cite it. A news source would be preferred the trailer may be self-serving; it could be someone's hope. See help:referencing for beginners. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Operation dost

Thank for editing the page of Operation Dost is mistakenly edited by my friend Aditya Pathak He is in class 8A Aviral maurya6424 (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

@Aviral maurya6424: beware: Your account could be indeffed. wp:Compromised accounts Adakiko (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Stop reverting my edits

Bro stop reverting my edits on St Kilda FC season summaries. You have no clue about any of them. My edits make the page actually make sense as a season summary. You're reverting so much work into a horrible looking template. Give it a rest and trust that fans of the football club are only editing to make their club look better 49.198.107.192 (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Don't remove citations that support other content. See wp:verifiability Adakiko (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed u undid my edits on Properties of water. why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.93.145 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Pearl Hart

I'm sorry to have not cited a reliable source but i don't really know if i can do that. It has been published by an italian comic book editor and i don't know if they want to have a citation here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.10.130.52 (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

are you a robot?

editing an opinion presented as fact to reflect accurate language does not require a source way to uphold white supremacy 2601:980:4000:9C0:2875:A155:368E:9DEC (talk) 11:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

It would appear you are doing the same. "wikt:Enslaved" means to make a free-person a slave. Owning a slave is not enslavement. Owning a slave isn't any better. Adakiko (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
I have no dog in this fight, but I would like to point out, Adakiko, that you create work for other editors when you add content to any article because of your lack of understanding of punctuation and grammar. I write this here to use the example of what you wrote above. In ""...wikt:Enslaved" means to make a free-person a slave," hyphenating "free-person" is incorrect.
A hyphen is used as a compound modifier when the modifier comes before the word it is modifying. A compound modifier is made up of two or more words that work together to function like one adjective. For example, "it was a high-level meeting." However, you do not hyphenate when the modifier comes after the noun it modifies, as in "the meeting was of a high level."
Your grammar mistakes are not limited to hyphenation problems. Please familiarize yourself with punctuation before you edit. I suspect that English may not be your first language. In one article, you had a period in the middle of a sentence, which was something like "She married Joe Blow. in 1948 and had two children..." I find there are too many grammatical errors in your editing to think that was a typographical error. I draw your attention to this only to assist. If you would like, I could refer you to helpful websites. Just let me know if you are interested. All the best to you. MarydaleEd (talk) 01:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
@MarydaleEd: I added "free-person" to a Wikipedia article? Diff, please? Also, a diff for the last mention? BTW:I do wp:RCP. Very little actual content modification. Adakiko (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Adakiko, I am simply pointing out that I have found several grammatical errors in your editing and encouraging you to pay close attention to your grammar when you are editing. I have not followed behind you to check up on you, but I will if you want. I think rather than have me follow behind you in search of your errors, it would be better for you to just try to improve. I will be happy to let you know if I come across any other ones. I mean no disrespect. Just wanted to give you a heads up. All the best. MarydaleEd (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
@MarydaleEd: Evidence, please. A {{diff}} preferably, or an article link where I made an edit that added a grammatical error. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 07:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Of course. I am happy to comply. I am working on another article right now that is taking up a lot of my time, but as soon as I am finished I give you my word I will search for the errors I found. Keep in mind that since they are in the past, it might take me a while to locate the ones I saw. Thank you for responding to my "heads up" with the same respect in which it was offered. So many times people get really defensive in these types of situations, but I have not found that at all in your responses. It speaks well for your character. All the best.🙂
@MarydaleEd: No need to go through my numerous edits. I would recommend that if you have such issues in the future with me or others that you leave a page link or a {{diff}}. Especially someone who make numerous edits. Please realize that I do very little editing. I'm a bad editor. So those grammar errors are probably someone's edit that I reverted. Please examine some of my edit history: Special:Contributions/Adakiko and you will see edit summaries that are mostly "(Reverted edits by..." - me undoing someone's problematic edit which may be vandalism, unsourced content, unexplained deletion, spam, tests, etc. followed by "‎ Message re..." which is usually a warning template. Being a rather bad editor, I don't want to (probably nobody wants me to) analyze their edit(s) and pick out the good parts or add citations (usually). Their edit is saved in the wp:page history and the editor can fix it from that. Their talk page is usually added to my watch list and the template suggests leaving a message on my talk page. You can see from some of the editing history of my talk page that there are a few unhappy customers. Some of their comments and edit summaries have been WP:REVDELed (revision deleted). Happy editing! Adakiko (talk) 02:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, but no mistake was made as far as misunderstanding where you edited and where you reverted. However, you are absolutely right that I should have said nothing without giving you proper evidence. Forgive me. When I saw that you wrote "...means to make a free-person a slave" I jumped on that error too quickly, thinking it was a good time to point out other grammar errors I'd found in your editing. I will search for the incidents because you deserve to have proof from someone who makes an accusation. Again, forgive me for posting without being able to back up my comment in the moment. I was wrong. I am embarrassed for making that mistake. It was bad form on my part. All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarydaleEd (talk • contribs) 03:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
@MarydaleEd: My apology, the "evidence" is at the top of this section! How embarrassing. Yep, bad English on my part. I will strive to do better. Best wishes Adakiko (talk) 04:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Adakiko (talk), it is clear that you would like this conversation to go away, and I am happy to comply. I fear my efforts to call attention to your grammatical challenges in hopes of helping you have served to make you uncomfortable. If that is the case, I am happy to apologize. That was never my intent. You were right to ask for evidence of my assertions and I was happy to locate them, but we will just call it a day on this subject. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I hope to be able to collaborate with you on an article some day. All the best.🙂 MarydaleEd (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

@MarydaleEd: You are welcome to discuss it here. I am often frustrated and tired from all the vandalism and bad edits, so my mood does swing quite a bit. I think that "free-person" was due to my uncertainty with the topic. If it had been in an article, I probably would have done some research on the grammar. Best wishes! Adakiko (talk) 22:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

You are truly a lovely person, Adakiko (talk). I was going to email you privately, but I don't see the option to do so on your User page. I have been a professional journalist and editor for more than 40 years. If I can ever assist you, please feel free to call on me. It would be a pleasure to work with you. All the best to you.🙂 MarydaleEd (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
@MarydaleEd: Thank you for your kind assessment, MarydaleEd. I hope I live up to that! I believe I have email enabled. It appears that you do not. You may need to enable email on preferences->User profile/Email options and check Allow other users to email me. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

User talk:Faran315

Hi Adakiko,

Please take a moment to fix your signatures at User talk:Faran315. A few more seconds of effort invested in dealing with the user's questions could probably also have helped.

Faran315 doesn't seem to have made test edits, so the first warnings were expectably confusing. The first time you've mentioned verifiability concerns was in one single final warning, referring to the BLP policy as if you had previously warned them about it.

Also, as I wrote months or years before (I think via e-mail), I find your addition of "wp:" in front of every wikilink pretty unnecessary and confusing; it makes the resulting sentences harder to read. You may be interested in using the pipe trick.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Wow, now it's time for me to apologize; most of my advice was probably unnecessary and talking down. I'm impressed by your edits to User talk:Faran315 and take all the concerns voiced above back. Thank you very much for the detailed advice you have provided to them, and please let me know if they still continue making the same edits again and again. 🌻 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: My apology to you! Unfortunately, I did need the sharp elbow to the ribs hint. I should have started with the BLP. Need a warning template that is customizable for multiple issues. Or just type the message into the user's talk page. I seem to have Gary Larson's fisherman's dilemma BLP, test, unexplained deletion - which template? I think the "editing tests" was due to the broken citations in the references. [1] I don't recall that about the "wp:". You likely sent it and I read it reversewise; I have been confused when the "wp:" was not visible. I'm still having issues with Faran315 who seems to be focusing on the poorly written content. No editing since. Good hearing from you again and thank you for the apology! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Heh, I once created User:ToBeFree/uw-combined-1. Sometimes, when there are actually two things I'd like to inform a user about, I do try to combine warnings of the same level. For example, I substitute {{uw-unsourced1}} and {{uw-delete1}} on the user's talk page, then edit the section and merge them to:

Information icon Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. Also, you added or changed content, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Please include a citation for such changes. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

But of course that's not always an option. Also, when someone is disrupting really quickly, I do tend to place templates as quickly as possible and don't expect them to be read anyway. I then just want to make sure that I tried warning the stubborn editor.
Regarding the "wp:" prefix, it's not always bad to have, and I agree that a lack of it can also cause confusion. It depends on the sentence, I think.
  • "Please have a look at WP:X"
  • "Please have a look at the X policy"
for example, both look good to me.
might be strange. After all, it's a matter of one's personal writing style though. There's no clear "wrong" or "right".
Yeah, I'm afraid Faran315 might still intend to make exactly the same changes again instead of discussing them at Talk:Nawaz Sharif with citations. At that point, I'd probably (partially?) block for edit warring. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: Thanks for the barnstar! That makes RCP much more rewarding!
It would be nice if Huggle went over the talk page and history to generate an appropriate warning. On Huggle check boxes for the problems and it synthesizes the warning. Maybe just use an AI to do it all? Buy out a crypto mining operation and a few gigawatt nuclear power plants to operate it. Instead of clicking "revert" repeatedly, click "donate" repeatedly? Adakiko (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
😅 I'm afraid that might actually happen. All the best! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: I'll have to watch that YouTube fully. Glad I don't have any kids. I've urged others not to have kids. In 1980, I reverse engineered the Apple 2 computer. I understood what every chip on the mother board and disk controller did. I understood DOS. Now, I am computer illiterate; as is everyone else on the planet. This parody is likely soon to be reality. Though It will probably Google's AI, not an android... Adakiko (talk) 13:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
I met Vernor Vinge and had him sign A Fire Upon the Deep "Onward to the singularity". As a joke. He didn't seem to think it funny. Adakiko (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
I laughed wayyy too hard about that video! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Parvathy thiruvoth

Why are you again saving some of the poor private awards which are unimportant and with no sources at all Bommi maaran 2023 (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you very much for the work you tirelessly do, day after day, to keep Wikipedia's article free from original research, strange claims by conspiracy theorists, pure vandalism and everything else that would otherwise make the encyclopedia a sad place. While we make no guarantee of validity, many readers do take Wikipedia's content at face value, and they can often safely do so partly because of your work. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

This page about dhirendra Krishna shastri

One should not spread information about such fraudsters who are trying to radicalise India on basis of religion and play with peoples belief! 2405:201:3028:FA83:D1E0:E5E9:6A36:33CA (talk) 21:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Based on who's viewpoint? Wikipedia is not wp:CENSORED. Adakiko (talk) 21:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

The Massacre, and its lack of stills or fragments

It is well attested that nothing remains of The Massacre, no telesnaps were taken and no footage at all is known to exist. I did not believe that removing the assertion that there are "stills and/or fragments" required a citation as that itself was an unsourced statement. The statement was part of the template which a clumsy editor must have copypasted. 92.21.249.87 (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

The citation's source here states "Reconstructed using photos and the original audio soundtrack". Adakiko (talk) 03:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

My answer to on whose viewpoint

Bro this page seems to be advocating that dhirendra Krishna shastri has some sort of spiritual power and he been targeted..you mentioned his and yogi adityanath thoughts on A hindu radicalised nation!! 2405:201:3028:FA83:D1E0:E5E9:6A36:33CA (talk) 05:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Just want to know

Why exaggerating about him??? 2405:201:3028:FA83:D1E0:E5E9:6A36:33CA (talk) 05:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

What in the infobox that you removed was an exaggeration? It could be toned down significantly, but blanking numerous sections is not the way to do it. Adakiko (talk) 06:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Compper changes

You’re right they shouldn’t be deleted . But please, at least put it to ex-Wife then . Marcom146 (talk) 13:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Moved content

"get it moved first, then remove this content. Your content move was undone" I didn't understand the issue you mentioned. I already moved the content to Ethnic groups in Turkey article. Thank you for your help. Blubluman (talk) 20:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Gina Lollobrigida

Francesca lollobrigida is not the great niece of Gina lollobrigida. To be her great niece Francesca would have to be the daughter of one of Gina’s 3 sisters and she is not. The only sister that had children is Giuliana lollobrigida and she had 1 son. The other 2 sister died young with out having children. All media about Francesca lollobrigida being her great niece is wrong. Taglines1991 (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

@Taglines1991: Please cite a reliable source supporting that. Your and my assertions hold no weight on Wikipedia. Adakiko (talk) 02:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Family. I am married to Gina’s nephew. The only child any of her sisters had. That would make my daughter her great niece and only great niece. Taglines1991 (talk) 02:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Evidence that Taglines1991 is married to Gina's nephew? Secondly, evidence that Gina Lollobrigida and Francesca Lollobrigida aren't related as two reliable sources state? Oh, first requested evidence not needed, just the second. Adakiko (talk) 03:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

About my deletes

Hey Adakiko, 

 I removed links from Fabinho (footballer, born 1993) as there are many links that they are not necessary I saw the archive of the site and I saw that soccerway give us these information in one link so I removed these links. 41.239.59.70 (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Book of Mormon

I have once again removed the irrelevant passage, as it did not incorporate well into the rest of the text, but also removed the incorrect data that I added back in with my reverts.

Happy now?

2601:18F:107F:BA80:C17:1635:BC5F:4326 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Scott Adams

Could you give me more detail why my edit was not constructive? I made my reasoning on why we should not put one sided political opinions on Wikipedia. It is perfectly clear that ADL has a strong political bias. I'm not gonna make and argument about whether "It's OK to be white", because if it is not clear by now, I can't help about that. However, I can point out that, if we agree with ADL, most black people are white supremacists. Just from here, one can see that ADL is a far-left (or whatever it is called) polically biased organization. With 180 degree rotation and with some exaggeration, one can write "Black Lives Mattes! is a phrase described by KKK as being associated with the black supremacist movement." Both should not be on Wikipedia.

So, if you still think that my thinking is wrong somewhere, could you please explain to me? Mstf221 (talk) 02:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

@Mstf221: Per wp:BRD, please discuss this on talk:Scott Adams. The Guardian and Politico are considered wp:RS. It appears wp:DUE to me. Adakiko (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
@Mstf221: Your discussion goes on talk:Scott Adams, not here. As your addition was on the wrong talk page, I removed it. Adakiko (talk) 03:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice btw. Mstf221 (talk) 03:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Revert

I think you made a mistake, so I edited it to be more neutral and removed the blog post.
I removed the blog/news post because it made a disputed claim about the origin of the dish, which may have introduced a POV bias. I apologize for removing other sources unintentionally, but I believe that they do not provide conclusive evidence for the origin of the dish. Therefore, I suggest we use more neutral language and avoid making definitive claims about the origin of the dish. Green papaya salad 2001:FB1:88:A95C:C189:BC7B:98D8:BE5D (talk) 06:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Credit Suisse

Hello Adakiko! You sent me a message about edits to Credit Suisse, and that you've reverted them. In fact, you've reverted twice, removing the vandalism that I was removing, and the vandalism itself. The end result is the same, in effect, but I wanted to clear this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.98.83.5 (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss on talk:Credit Suisse per wp:BRD. BTW: New discussions should go to the bottom of the page. Adakiko (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Krishna I and Krishna II

Krishna I And Krishna II are not Shaivities please refer Citation p71 Dridhaprahara (talk) 10:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

@Dridhaprahara: You removed the content and source here on Krishna I with an wp:edit summary of provide page number for your citation for verification. The page number "p78" was included in the citation that you removed. Same for your removal of content and cite on Krishna II pages 105–106 were specified in the citation. Wikipedia reflects what wp:reliable sourcess state. Adakiko (talk) 10:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Nothing like that on page 135-136: https://archive.org/details/VaisnavismSaivismMRS/page/n138/mode/1up?view=theater Dridhaprahara (talk) 11:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Discuss this on talk:Krishna I and talk:Krishna II. Your mentioned source doesn't negate the other source. See wp:BRD. Adakiko (talk) 11:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Motor Racing Network

Here it is straight from Moody himself: https://twitter.com/DGodfatherMoody/status/1509979833081729030

He has also said this multiple times on his program. Mike Bagley is obviously in a similar boat. Only time I have heard them call west coast races is the Championship Race in Phoenix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.241.97 (talk) 07:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Do you think that is notable for Motor Racing Network? The source should be added to Motor Racing Network. Instructions for adding a citation are on your talk page. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Rangeyeg6363

Hello Adakiko, I can assume you are an administrator because of the newsletter, right? Anyways, I saw you reverted an edit made by User:Rangeyeg6363. He vandalized Alphabet Inc. multiple times, then proceeded to ignore my warning. Could you please block them? Thanks! // 💪Benzo💪 (Send me a message!) (Here's what I've contributed.) 09:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

@BenzoAid: I'm not an admin. I did report Rangeyeg6363 to wp:AIV. It is usually best to start with level 1 otherwise the real admins might not block them. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Alright. Thank you for reporting and giving me advice. // 💪Benzo💪 (Send me a message!) (Here's what I've contributed.) 10:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
@BenzoAid Just a little heads up, the surefire way to find out if someone's an admin or not is to open the "Tools" menu in top right corner (near view history), click "View user groups", and then look for "Administrator" in what's listed next to "Member of:". On old Vector skin the "View user groups" button will be located at the left sidebar under "Tools" section. AP 499D25 (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! // 💪Benzo💪 (Send me a message!) (Here's what I've contributed.) 10:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

sorry

sorry, i had been up to 4am last night, so i was kinda loopy. i know i said some things i shouldn't have. i just wanted to screw around since i already got banned from the discord server i was doing that in. I am def not that larry guy. i just sat looking at recent changes waiting for something interesting to happen. sorry for rude comments n' shit. im surprised you didnt block me. thanks i guess. 104.235.70.23 (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply] 104.235.70.23 (talk) 04:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

new message

did you message me. i cant see it. 104.235.70.23 (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Adakido, regarding your edit of my changes to The Puddle page, the Myspace pages that were linked are long defunct and the Bandcamp pages I added instead are their closest current equivalent. Feel free to add some different links, but the Myspace ones definitely need replacing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.225.41.124 (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

5 April 2023

Hi, thanks for reverting vandalism! This edit here, [[1]], I have seen a lot, it seems a guarantee of intentional vandalism. I think if someone edits an article to have that, it's so obviously vandalism that starting with a level 1 warning seems too slow. It's not awful but they're almost inevitably going to repeat the action several more times on that page or other pages. This isn't really a huge suggestion, I just think one should be more prone to warning with greater effect for such a repetitive (though vaguely amusing) source of devilry. ButterCashier (talk) 11:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

@ButterCashier: Given the anon's history, I should have. To AFG or to ABF... Cheers Adakiko (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

15 April 2023

Sorry I think you have misunderstood.But the consensus was to merge Hwoarang article to List of Tekken characters 103.120.117.110 (talk) 10:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reg: Shia view of Quran - Rollback

Neutrality is not accepting points which have no citations for ages. If there is a third person who is publishing an article as 'so and so accused shia having a different quran' and then goes on to himself call it a forgery and has no shia authoritative leader or followers make a claim that they follow or accept that forgery, and infact that third person appreciates that shias do not subscribe to such forgery. I do not think it is fair to use that source to project that shia's have a different quran. That is common sense, and that is why the changes were made. Please review your reverting the changes or share what exactly do you think is not the neutral stance in it! MohsynZ (talk) 11:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Datuk Seri Noraini ahmad

Dear Akiko,

all the changes I made is true, I’m keep trying make the changes since yesterday but it back to the same articles

I am her senior secretary, I made the changes with her concern because the current article is not accurate and not updated at all.

can you please help me update the articles accordingly

This for the Profile:

Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad (Jawi: نورعيني بنت أحمد; born 7 November 1967) is is a well respected Malaysian politician with an impressive career spanning over a decade. She currently serves as the Chairman of the Rubber Industry Smallholder Development Authority (RISDA) since March 2023, and as a Member of Parliament (MP) for Parit Sulong since March 2008.

Her political career began in 2008 when she was appointed as the Deputy Minister of Human Resources in the Barisan Nasional (BN) administration under former Prime Ministers Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Najib Razak and former Minister Subramaniam Sathasivam. In March 2020, she was appointed as the Minister of Higher Education in the Perikatan Nasional (PN) administration under former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, a position she held until August 2021. She then continued to serve as the Minister of Higher Education in the BN administration under former Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob until the fall of the BN administration in November 2022.

Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad has also been actively involved in various committees and organizations. She was appointed as Chairman of the Accounts Committee kira Wang Negara (PAC) under the administration of Pakatan Harapan (PH) from April 2019 until the appointment of ministers in March 2020. Additionally, she is the Honorary Secretary of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) of Malaysia since 2018, Chairman of the Commonwealth Women's Parliament (CWP), and Member of the Commonwealth Committee of the Parliamentary Association from 2017 to 2019.

Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad's service extends beyond politics to the business world, where she has made significant contributions. She served as Chairman of the Malaysian Foreign Trade Development Corporation (MATRADE) from 2013 to 2018 and General Manager of Padiberas Nasional Berhad (BERNAS) from 1998 to 2003. She also led several federal agencies, including the Malaysian Network Information Center and Astronautical Technology.

As a member of the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), a component party of the BN coalition, She has held several leadership positions within the party. She served as the 10th UMNO Women's Leader since June 2018 and the 2nd UMNO Women's Youth Leader from 2004 to 2009 and the First Women's Youth Deputy Leader from 2001 until being promoted to the position of women's youth leader in 2004. She made history as the first female PAC chairman in Malaysian history, highlighting her commitment to breaking gender barriers.

In conclusion, Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad is a remarkable politician and business leader with a wealth of experience and accomplishments. Her dedication to public service, leadership roles within her party, and her contributions to various committees and organizations demonstrate her commitment to advancing Malaysia's development. Her achievements and commitment to breaking gender barriers have earned her the respect and admiration of her peers and constituents alike.


THIS FOR HER LIFE AND EDUCATION


Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad began her academic journey at the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, where she obtained a Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1991, with a double major in quantitative and financial analysis. She then pursued a Master's degree in Business Administration (MBA) at Tun Abdul Razak University (UNIRAZAK) in 2005, which equipped her with the skills and knowledge to excel in the field of business management. In 2016, Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad furthered her education by obtaining a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Development Management from Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), where she demonstrated her passion for research and contributed significantly to the academic community. In 2022, she achieved yet another remarkable milestone by completing her second Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) at Asia e-University (AeU), with the title of his DBA dissertation being "A Phenomenological Study of Women Entrepreneurs and Its Impact on Socio-Economic Growth in Malaysia". As a Malaysian and the first woman to complete a DBA at AeU through the APEL Q system, she made history and set a shining example for others to follow. Driven by a relentless thirst for knowledge, Datuk Seri Noraini Ahmad is currently pursuing her third Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) at the National University of Malaysia (UKM). Her dedication to her studies and research is a testament to her commitment to advancing her knowledge and contributing to the field of business management. In conclusion, Her multiple advanced degrees in business and development management, coupled with her passion for research, make her a valuable asset to any organization. Her unwavering commitment to ongoing learning and pursuit of knowledge is a testament to her dedication to personal and professional growth.

THANKS A LOT 🙏🏽 180.75.238.132 (talk) 01:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

edits

Hi please look at the discussion on nationality and the explanations on talk page it was decided to not add any specific claim you are restoring a version which will cause edit wars. 2A02:C7C:6782:7A00:F11A:E166:5465:8297 (talk) 11:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Please take a look at this [2] compare the original version to the new edit made recently adding unsourced information and deleting sourced information I would appreciate it if you can properly restore it to the one prior to Hairy Wookies edit as I am not sure how to do it correctly. 2A02:C7C:6782:7A00:F11A:E166:5465:8297 (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Just a heads up that I removed a maintenance template {{advert}} from the article at Harrow School, which you placed in June 2022 [3]. I read through the article and didn't find anything too promotional; then I looked at the accumulated edits since the tag was placed [4] and saw that some promotional statements had indeed been removed. Given that, I removed the template. I will not object if you feel the template still flags a valid concern. Cheers. signed, Willondon (talk) 14:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

@Willondon: No problem; thanks for the note and your hard work! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Market structure

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Market structure, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Munjed Al Muderis

The edit that you rolled back here was not vandalism. Please don't use rollback or Huggle in such cases. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For dealing with that LTA (User:Lithuaniaball2) on Ford Mustang Mach-E. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
@Shadow of the Starlit Sky: Thank you very much! Real positive reinforcement is much appreciated! Thanks Adakiko (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
@Shadow of the Starlit Sky: Bad notification, resending! Adakiko (talk) 16:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
@Adakiko No problem. Keep up the great work! -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 16:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

You made a mistake

You didn’t notice that the paragraphs were duplicated in the article. 2A01:B747:26:344:7D78:5663:7BB3:5751 (talk) 20:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

That was the only mention of "Fox News". Adakiko (talk) 20:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

edits to Grodzisk Mazowiecki–Zawiercie railway

Hello, the edit [5] doesn't really introduce any new information to the article, it merely streamlines the lead moving some less important facts and deleting repeating statements. 91.189.72.7 (talk) 21:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

It removed the citations. wp:citing sources Adakiko (talk) 21:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
the quoted sources "Portal Polska.pl, Timeline of Events". Archived from the original on 2011-10-08. Retrieved 2011-08-09. is still included further down in the article, I've removed the fact it refers to from the lead as it's too crowded there,
  • the second one "Although the CMK might have allowed high-speed travel, high-speed services never started, and thus the Italian Direttissima from Rome to Florence, which opened in 1978, is generally credited to have been the first true high-speed line in Europe. (source)" isn't really useful, it's more of an offhand remark not related directly to this particular railway line
  • the third one is pretty generic and not really related to the sentence it refers to,
  • the fourth and fifth about promises from 2018 to increase the speed to 250 km/h by the end of 2023 refer to a statement that appears to be no longer operational "CMK: Prędkość rekordowa, ale czasy przejazdu nie"., recent media reports speak of 2025 (https://forsal.pl/transport/kolej/artykuly/8712592,szybka-kolej-pociagi-na-cmk-predkosc-250-kmh.html) but that's speculative and I don't think it should be mentioned in the article at all until the are concrete deadlines set
91.189.72.7 (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing this up! I restored your edit. Thanks again! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Alluding khiljui

he was afghan don't touch history and don't edit again Zeezup (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

@Zeezup: Please wp:cite a wp:reliable source (RS) supporting that change. Wikipedia goes by what RS states, not by what editors assert. Adakiko (talk) 10:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your auto correction made a mistake

For article False titles of nobility, I have removed false claims, such as the English title of Lord of the manor is entitled to the Scottish title of The Much Honoured. This is completely wrong, but you have undone my correction of this false information. There is a source beside this, which links to a page about something completely different, a Scottish feudal Barony. I do not understand why you wish to retain this lie. I can only presume that you made an honest mistake or otherwise are a dishonest person. You must let accurate information appear and false information to be removed. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

You removed valid citations without giving a valid reason. Disagreeing with the citation is not a valid reason. Adakiko (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
No, the citation is about something completely different. That is not a disagreement. Taht is false use of a reference. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
valid reason was giving, stating that this reference is on another topic. Scottish feudal baronies are not English lordships of the manor. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 12:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Clearly you have no knowledge on thai topic and therefore should not be making edits to the page. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Scotland and England have separate legal systems and different social customs. The title accorded to a Scottish feudal baron is NOT accorded to an English lord of the manor. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 12:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
I have just read the source and it even makes no reference whatsoever to "The Much Honoured". This proves the comment to be false. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
As a genuine English Lord of the Manor, I know I am not entitled to be called The Much Honoured based on this. The comment you are trying to keep is fraudulent. 82.129.53.90 (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adakiko/Archive_5&oldid=1161115718"