User talk:Bommi maaran 2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Someone who's wrong on the internet. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Materialscientist that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doli Saja Ke Rakhna have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please see WP:RS Sid95Q (talk) 02:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How it seems unconstructive to you.. Check more reference on google and clearly check what is right and what is wrong... Why can't you provide reference rather than undoing some one's credit of editings... Do you think it is a good attitude.. Think well.. đŸ™đŸ» Bommi maaran 2023 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User:Kailash29792, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your edits to User:Kailash29792 are absolutely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Discuss the edits, do not make personal attacks towards other editors. [1] Ravensfire (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Eswaran Naveen per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eswaran Naveen. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 13:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Eswaran Naveen per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pundachimol raaavensfire. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 15:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]