User talk:SniperLight47

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SniperLight47, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kobe Jae Chong, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fermiboson (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kobe Chong[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kobe Jae Chong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fermiboson (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anthony Laffor have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Giant Snowman 17:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kervens Belfort, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Ubaidullah Shamsul, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ubaidullah Shamsul for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ubaidullah Shamsul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubaidullah Shamsul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 15:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont delete it ! SniperLight47 (talk) 12:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please stop your deleting clubs from players' ledes without making sure that the lede sentence is still grammatically correct. You have done this on multiple occasions—notably at Rahmat Makasuf and Mohd Faiz Subri, among others. Your inability to see this makes me question your WP:COMPETENCE, and if you continue to make grammatically incorrect edits, such edits will be considered disruptive and you may be blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro rahmat makasuf official terengganu f.c sudah bagitahu tidak akan sambung kontraknya ... stupid bot dunno anything! SniperLight47 (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is English-language Wikipedia. Please use English when communicating. Anwegmann (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just translate bro ? You look like poop SniperLight47 (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how this works. Anwegmann (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just shut up? So annoying bruh ... SniperLight47 (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I am pinging an experienced admin who has had an issue with you in the past, so that they see your response this and your unwillingness to follow the most basic Wikipedia policies—use of proper language and grammatically correct content. Anwegmann (talk) 19:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive and grammatically incorrect editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced and/or grammatically incorrect content, as you have now done several times at Rahmat Makasuf, you may be blocked from editing. This is the second warning for this in a single day. Anwegmann (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop annoying me stupid ! Check before charge it ! SniperLight47 (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Giant Snowman 21:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You talk so much mate ? who need you here ? SniperLight47 (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SniperLight47, when I blocked your sock, apparently I forgot to block you, but this childishness is a good reason for me to correct that mistake, bruh. Drmies (talk) 01:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for repeated disruption and personal attacks, including editing another editor's user page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 18:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Please stop reverting reasonable, productive edits without explanation or reasoning, as you recently did at Azam Azmi. Likewise, you also incorrectly deleted clubs from players' ledes—e.g. Rahmat Makasuf—about which you were already warned. Such edits will be considered disruptive if you continue to make them, and you may be blocked from editing again. Anwegmann (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SniperLight, you noticed that I blocked your other accounts, User:SniperLight46 and User:OnlySL. I guess I forgot to block this account, and that's sad, since I caused even more trouble for Anwegmann. Here's the thing: if you are going to create a sock account to have your way in an article, and that sock account, and the next one, act in exactly the same way as the original account (sorry, pardon my French, but if you speak to other editors in that completely dickish way, well), you should not be surprised if you get found out. So, maybe, next time you create a sock, stick to the guidelines, be nice to other editors, be cooperative, and don't talk to them like some snot-nosed kid on Discord who has no respect for his elders might talk. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ubaidullah Shamsul[edit]

Hello, SniperLight47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ubaidullah Shamsul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Ubaidullah Shamsul[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Ubaidullah Shamsul, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]