User talk:Kirkukturk3

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, A Better Human Being, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh haha sorry I'm gonna try and do it again because this time I will add my sources. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Hawija District. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 03:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Hawija. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 03:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kerkük Sanjak moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kerkük Sanjak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) The article is currently supported by only a single source. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable,but kerkük sanjak isnt very well documented Kirkukturk3 (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Kerkük Sanjak, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 00:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mersin. Uness232 (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the page before the edit and nothing was wrong with it,Sources are well cited and the article had nothing related with it. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should not have presumed that it was bad faith. It however does have these problems. Parts of the page are written like a tourism brochure, and parts of the history section are sparsely cited. Uness232 (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm i will try to fix those problems no worries. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Kirkukturk3! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 08:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of mountains and hills in Kirkuk for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mountains and hills in Kirkuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mountains and hills in Kirkuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Daquq has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ternera. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Daquq—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 19:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its officially called Tavuk kasabası by both Kirkuk and Iraq you can't argue against it when it's a majority Shia turkmen town (I've literally been there) and the fact it's in the kurds and kurdistan Category is offensive for the residents of the town even the kaka'i kurds that inhabit as minorities there. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User “ Kirkukturk3“ welcome message[edit]

Hello "Kirkukturk3,"

I'm delighted to extend a warm welcome to you on Wikipedia! Whether you're a new member or have been with us for a while, it's a pleasure to connect with you. I stumbled upon your account quite by chance, and it was a happy surprise.

It's genuinely inspiring to see Turkmens just like me on this platform, actively contributing to safeguarding the integrity of information and amplifying our-“Turkmeneli” collective voice on a global scale. Your efforts in combating vandalism and enriching the content are highly appreciated.

Thank you for your valuable contributions. NICTON t (talk) 05:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, if you find yourself with some free time on Wikipedia, I'd appreciate the opportunity to discuss certain issues related to K...ish vandalism. I believe your insights could be incredibly helpful in addressing and rectifying these matters. Your assistance in this regard would be greatly valued. NICTON t (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NICTON t,It's also very nice to see that to see another turkmen here. I'm fighting about kurdish vandalism because I've studied the area well, I've visited alot of turkmen areas such as Qara tapa,Tuz Khurma,Laylan,Taza etc, ove noticed tons of vandalism on Wikipedia trying to hide the iraqi turkmen identity such as Kirkuk city page which states that a politican states that its turkmens cultural capital although it has been that years before even this politican was born and also Semsûrî edits many turkmen town pages to represent kurds more without using any valid reason,once again nice to meet you! Kirkukturk3 (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerkük Sanjak (March 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kerkük Sanjak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kirkukturk3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal treatment plant[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Royal treatment plant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.truepunk.com/band/Royal%20Treatment%20Plant/interview/Royal%20Treatment%20Plant/253#:~:text=With%20guitarist%20Sam,%20keyboardist%20Tommy,Plant%20was%20born%20in%202006. and https://www.ukfestivalguides.com/artists/royal-treatment-plant/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue[edit]

You were previously advised about our copyright policy but have again placed copyrighted text into your draft. You cannot do this. You must write in your own words. Copying text from sources and then modifying the words makes it a derivative work which is still a copyright violation. If this occurs again, you will be blocked form editing. -- Whpq (talk) 13:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which page specifically? Kirkukturk3 (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look above. Royal treatment plant. -- Whpq (talk) 13:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subdistricts of Kirkuk moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Subdistricts of Kirkuk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!I appreciate you doing that since I'm still workng on the article and will change it drastically soon. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 12:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Kirkukturk3. Thank you for your work on Kerkük Sanjak. TechnoSquirrel69, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there, Kirkukturk3, thanks for creating this article. Due to the subject of the article being historical, and information about it most likely not being in English, it's difficult for me to determine whether or not this place even existed without additional citations to reliable sources. Please demonstrate that the subject is notable, or it risks being nominated for deletion. Let me know if you have any questions! (please mention me on reply; thanks!)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TechnoSquirrel69}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: Hi, yes it did exist I found many books and sources on it and it's even mentioned on the Mosul vilayet page! I will update it when I managed to cite sources since I'm new to citing books as sources.Kirkukturk3 (talk) Kirkukturk3 (talk) 03:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, Kirkukturk3. I'm happy to help with the citations if you need it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for offering the help!I will ask you whenever I have trouble with it. Kirkukturk3 (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]