User talk:5.44.170.9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 5.44.170.9, has made edits to Liberty Statue (Budapest) that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 12:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheDoDahMan. Your recent edit(s) to the page 5G appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheDoDahMan (talk) 16:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rare-earth element, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. andritolion (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi 5.44.170.9! You created a thread called Found two nearly identical articles on major topic at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


June 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests, you may be blocked from editing. Wefk423 (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019 Gulf of Oman attack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StudiesWorld (talk) 13:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

3RR Warning[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Șor Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woody (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Apidima Cave[edit]

On 14 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Apidima Cave, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

SpencerT•C 23:14, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN/C[edit]

Please don't re-open it like that. If you would like to contest it, please ask User:Tone on their talk page. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whack[edit]

August 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Altai Republic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Bakharev (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

5.44.170.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here That's some exceptional bureaucracy here. I am not evading any bans as I've never been blocked before. Can someone properly explain to me why was I banned? I assume that, as I've predicted, the reason was that I dared to disagree with the PC crowd [here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&diff=prev&oldid=911202788], correct?

Decline reason:

This IP address hasn't been banned, it has been blocked. This is an important difference; see WP:BLOCK and WP:BAN. It's unclear to me if you are evading a previous block or not. But, the edit you use to defend yourself, wow. Are you attempting to justify us increasing the block substantially? That seems to be what you are doing. That edit is either a lame attempt to troll us or a profound lack of understanding of WP:NOTE, or something far worse. Yamla (talk) 11:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Red Orchestra edit warring[edit]

Hi @5.44.170.9: You've reverted an edit twice now on the above article. Can you please provide the evidence that what was previously stated in the article is wrong. Personally I think what you have written is wrong since the only folk that new about the Rote Kapelle was the Soviet Union and East Germany. Most of the rest of the world didn't know the full details about the network even right up until the turn of the century when new approach was taken, new evidence was unearthed and a reappraisal occurred. scope_creepTalk 13:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting that the Tuchel reference doesn't support what your stating. scope_creepTalk 13:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted this. If you can provide a good reference that disproves it otherwise, it will be changed. scope_creepTalk 13:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (5.44.170.9) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! KNHaw (talk) 16:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Nedelin Catastrophe[edit]

I've pointed out multiple times the sources that give varying death figures. I don't understand why you keep asking for sources when they've been given already - perhaps we can clear it up here? NekoKatsun (nyaa) 15:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Three more years. You need to have your main account unblocked if you want to continue.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Yury Vlasov[edit]

On 17 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yury Vlasov, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 17:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:5.44.170.9&oldid=1007343562"