Talk:Mills High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who keeps putting Mills' school colors as "Red and White"? They're Red and Gold. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.122.14.112 (talkcontribs) 06:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re-assessed at Start class (can easily be C class). Djharrity (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

I've added a merge proposal for Mills Robotics Team, it has already been mentioned on that article's talk page before and it does not seem to be sufficiently notable itself. Snigbrook (talk) 01:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it should be merged. Zedla (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • As there were no objections, I've merged it. —Snigbrook 21:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The camera in the girls' bathroom incident[edit]

I just deleted six paragraphs worth of uncited text about a faculty member who allegedly put a camera in a girls' bathroom. The only reference given [1] was before he was sentenced, so all it states is that he resigned.

There are two major issues here. The first is that, under WP:BLP, information about living people must be backed up with reliable sources. From that standpoint, I think we can say that a teacher has resigned over allegations that he hid a camera, but not that he hid a camera (depending on what other sources say).

My second concern is undue weight. Roughly a quarter of the vertical length of the article was taken up by coverage of the person. If it's framed within the context of the school, I could see a well-written paragraph being warranted—even if it's one paragraph by itself in a Controversies section. If independent sources show it was a major controversy at the school, then expanding the coverage along those lines is warranted. However, it doesn't warrant six paragraphs under such a fleeting heading as "In the news". —C.Fred (talk) 13:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Academic excellence"[edit]

How does coming in 529th imply excellence in anything? Not a single one of the sources listed used the word Excellence. This is an encyclopedia. We deal in facts. If in fact being 516th, 529th or 816th actually showed excellence, you wouldn't need the weasel words to point that out. If it isn't WP:WEASEL (which it is), then it is WP:SYNTH and it still doesn't belong. Please tell me how you figure it isn't weasel? Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Mills High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mills High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mills High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]