Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 13 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 14[edit]

00:51, 14 March 2024 review of submission by 2603:7000:B900:71A5:2C0F:BF13:DE1B:716D[edit]

Can you please explain why my publications and accolades are not suffice to create a wikipedia page. A number of my fellow poets and writers all have pages but I am unable to. 2603:7000:B900:71A5:2C0F:BF13:DE1B:716D (talk) 00:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has articles as part of the encyclopedia, not "pages" which has a broader meaning. Wikipedia articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic. While not forbidden, writing autobiographical articles is highly discouraged, please see the autobiography policy. Beware in using other articles as a guide, these too could be inappropriate and you would be unaware of this. See other stuff exists. If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those that are classified as good articles.
Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell about themselves and their work; articles summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about(in this case) a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable creative professional or more broadly a notable person. If you have independent reliable sources that chose on their own to give you significant coverage and tell what makes you important/significant/influential as a writer or person, that's what we need summarized- we don't just want sources documeting your work. Please see Your first article. 331dot (talk) 00:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vast swathes of your draft are unreferenced, which violates the core content policy Verifiability. Wikipedia is uninterested in what you know about yourself. Over 99% of efforts to write an autobiography end up as frustrating failures. Cullen328 (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:13, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Tamillifehacking[edit]

I Submitted My Article but the article was declined, anyone can help me, please? I don't what the problem anyone help to improve my article. Tamillifehacking (talk) 09:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB, YouTube, Wiki Commons and Wikipedia, your own website and Google search are not reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:49, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Venkatesh Pechetti[edit]

I am writing my own biography..in sandbox.. For that what type of references should i have to include.. if not have reference then what is the process... please help me.. thank you Venkatesh Pechetti (talk) 11:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please read the autobiography policy. Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources say about a topic, not what it says about itself. If you truly meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person, someone will eventually take note of coverage of you in independent sources and choose to write about you. Keep in mind that an article about yourself is not necessarily a good thing. If you want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:53, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Peppa pig e minha fds[edit]

I was declined for a unfair reason, i clearly did what was asked and was still declined Peppa pig e minha fds (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very few of your sources have to do with the cat, and those that do are inappropriate(mostly social media). The draft was correctly declined. Any draft about this cat must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage like news reports say about it.
I get the sense that this could be your cat. If so, you need to declare a conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 13:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Peppa pig e minha fds, I have had a look at your draft and noticed quite a few grammar mistakes that need fixing. Additionally, I didn't see any wikilinks included, it might be a good idea to add some. The main issue with your draft is the lack of reliable sources backing up what you've written. It's important to include sources that give significant coverage of the topic and support your points. Also, you've included a lot of details about the subject, so perhaps it's a good idea to trim some of the unnecessary ones. Regarding reference numbers 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, and 15, it would be wise to replace them with more reliable sources. I wanted to provide you with some detailed feedback. I hope this helps. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:48, 14 March 2024 review of submission by RAGYoung2024[edit]

Good morning, is there somone that can give me assistnance in setting up my Wikipedia page. RAGYoung2024 (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RAGYoung2024: what do you mean by "my Wikipedia page"? Your user page? See WP:UP. Your first article? See WP:YFA. An article about you? Don't. See WP:AUTOBIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to setting up the article. RAGYoung2024 (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"The article"? Still not sure what you mean, but one of the links I provided should give you the answer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your phrase "setting up my Wikipedia page" suggests that, like many people, you are confusing Wikipedia with social media.
This is an encyclopaedia. We don't "set up pages" here: we write articles, which are neutrally-written summaries of what reliable indepenent sources have published about a subject. Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:04, 14 March 2024 review of submission by MobeenYounasDigitalCreator[edit]

Which type of reference do I have to use in the article, & How can I improve the article? MobeenYounasDigitalCreator (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not a reliable source because it is user edited, so that one needs to go. Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MobeenYounasDigitalCreator I fixed your link for proper display(it lacked the "Draft:" portion). You have no sources that indicate this person meets WP:NACTOR. Assassination requires a political motivation for an attack, and I see no sources that describe shooting at this person as an assassination.
You identify yourself as a digital creator. If you are compensated for this, the terms of use require you to disclose that, see WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no option to select MobeenYounas as a username, so I have to keep my username as mobeenyounasdigitalcreator. Now, tell me a way how to change the username. MobeenYounasDigitalCreator (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to change your username; you need to comply with WP:PAID per the terms of use if your job is a content creator or marketer. 331dot (talk) 14:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They would probably be best advised to change their user name, as a quick Google search shows this is a business name. Theroadislong (talk) 14:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The name is fine as they seem to be Mr. Younas. They need to make the paid disclosure, though. 331dot (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No it is not paid content and tell me how to improve this article? Help me to rewrite it so i can understand what mistake i have done. MobeenYounasDigitalCreator (talk) 15:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If your job is a digital content creator, you are a paid editor, you do not need to be specifically paid to make edits. 331dot (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is rife with Name-dropping. A person does not become notable by associating with other notable people. Cullen328 (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:57, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Rizzler29[edit]

hey man, where do you think i can get references that solidify my article? If i cant find anything does that just mean this shouldnt be a wikipedia article in the first place? I wanted to make this as a way to follow and update people I know on the football club in question. Thanks, Onni Rizzler29 (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article must summarize what independent reliable sources say about the topic. As you did not provide any such sources, the draft was rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rizzler29: I rejected this as not only did you not provide any meaningful sources to establish notability, I couldn't find any when I searched myself (nothing at all for 'Steamy Football Club', and only a few useless hits for 'Steamy FC'), which is not surprising as I doubt there are any for a club of this calibre. If the team is part of Laajasalon Palloseura, you may be able to include a mention of it in that article, but only if supported by reliable sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:14, 14 March 2024 review of submission by 2603:8080:DBF0:8BE0:8879:84E2:1616:63BF[edit]

I'm not sure how to do this. The page title should be my professional name, Paula Maya. But the sandbox didn't let me add the title. So it's under Burleyhr sandbox. Is that the reason why it was declined? Should I create an account with my artistic name Paula Maya?

Thanks! 2603:8080:DBF0:8BE0:8879:84E2:1616:63BF (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please log into your account before posting. 331dot (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy link Draft:Paula Maya which has one unsourced sentence and nothing else. Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no connection between the name of an account, and the name of any article that account creates or edits. But writing about yourself is strongly discouraged: see autobiography.
Writing a Wikipedia article is a challenging task for an inexperienced editors, and even more if they have a conflict of interest. I advise not trying it at all until you have spent several months learning how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have learnt about reliable sources, verifiability, neutral point of view, and notability, you can read your first article, and decide whether or not your subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability. ColinFine (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That draft bears no resemblance to an actual encyclopedia article. Cullen328 (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:07, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Thibaukes[edit]

I want to make a page for my friend. Could i get any tips? Thibaukes (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place for you to tell the world about your friend. Wikipedia is a place to summarize what independent reliable sources like the news say about people that are notable as Wikipedia defines the term. 331dot (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes...don't. Theroadislong (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thibaukes, here is my tip. Go write about your friend on your favorite social media platform, not here. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with articles about notable topics. An ordinary 13 year old child is not notable. Cullen328 (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:34, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Radha krishna 123[edit]

Please help in adding reference

Radha krishna 123 (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Radha krishna 123: this draft has been rejected (twice), and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:17, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Klamakin[edit]

Dear Help Desk,

Reaching out for help with the article (my first on Wikipedia) that got rejected. Any guidance for the suggested edits will be very much appreciated.

Thank you. Klamakin (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection means that it won't be considered further. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for getting back to me. Is there anything I can do in the article for the reject status to be re-considered? Klamakin (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That question was answered yesterday, at #03:19, 13 March 2024 review of submission by Klamakin. If you manage to find suitable sources (each one of which meets the criteria in WP:42) and write an acceptable draft, then you can contact the reviewer who rejected it and ask them to reconsider. Please don't waste their time (or your own) unless you have found such sources. ColinFine (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:29, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Eggs111[edit]

I'm not mad, but I would like to know the reason for this rejection.I want to know how I could improve next time. Thanks. Eggs111 (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know why it got declined now. Thanks Eggs111 (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:09, 14 March 2024 review of submission by IgalSX[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Igal_Stulbach. << declined because not supported by reliable source...I think it includes several known and reliable sources What should I do to approve the page? IgalSX (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asked and answered at the Teahouse. Please don't post questions in multiple places. ColinFine (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:17, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Chennaiwiki20[edit]

got error : John Ahiya Naan: Directed by Appu k Sami. With Arul Anbalahan, Nakshatra Rao, Nizhalgal Ravi, Appu k Sami. Truth always killed by lies, finally truth will win Chennaiwiki20 (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An acceptable Wikipedia article is based on what independent, reliable sources say about the subject. You have cited two mere listings, and two Wikipedia articles (which can never be cited, as Wikipedia is not a reliable source. ColinFine (talk) 22:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21:48, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Hkc345[edit]

Hi, I have an undisclosed tag on the Wikipedia page even though I have disclosed on my talk page that I am being paid to edit. Do I have to disclose it somewhere else? Thank you Hkc345 (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see somebody has removed that tag, and replaced it with a different one. In my opinion, it is far too promotional. Great long lists of people and places he has played with do not serve Wikipedia, they only serve him. ColinFine (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:01, 14 March 2024 review of submission by Thegibster1[edit]

the editor is biased Thegibster1 (talk) 23:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@thegibster1: ok? what's your question? ltbdl (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]