Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 September 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 25 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 27 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 26[edit]

03:24:11, 26 September 2018 review of draft by Adriaancampo[edit]


I tried to submit a page called "the kota alliance". However, in my draft space, the text of my submission appears 2 times below each other, with in the middle the wikipedia notification that my draft is being reviewed. I am confused: why does my text appear 2 times? is this a mistake from my side, or is this normal?

Best, Adriaan Campo

Adriaancampo (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

03:49:36, 26 September 2018 review of draft by 185.61.186.158[edit]

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

I accidentally incorrectly named the draft which I have just created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Leonhardo The correct name of the draft (and the page) should be "Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind". I am new to the Wikipedia and I don't know how to fix it, please, could you correct this?

185.61.186.158 (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've moved it to Draft:Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:05:25, 26 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by SorchaKav[edit]


Hi,

I have published an article which was refused because of tonality which I can understand after reviewing it,I have made changes and resubmitted it. It has been awaiting a reviewer for 15 days, I was just wondering if this is normal or is there something I need to do?

Thanks Sorcha

SorchaKav (talk) 05:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is normal for a draft to be waiting up to two months. I have accepted the draft now as the subject is clearly notable. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:20:33, 26 September 2018 review of draft by EllenSheehy[edit]

I am concerned that I have not submitted my updated article correctly. It's been over 2 months. I made the requested changes, but I have not received any feedback since the original reviewer suggested those changes. Is it possible to 'see' whether my article is still in the queue to be reviewed? Thanks so much. I don't mind waiting, but it's been so long that I wonder if I resubmitted it correctly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Steve_Leder EllenSheehy (talk) 23:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EllenSheehy (talk) 23:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The draft is correctly submitted. There are also significant problems with it that will almost certainly lead to it being declined. I would suggest making some major improvements. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

= September 27 = Thank you for your comments. Can you please confirm which problems you are referring to with the article for Steve Leder so I can improve the article. I see that you have accepted the draft for review. Please advise me.EllenSheehy (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]