Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 13 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 14[edit]

00:22:29, 14 December 2018 review of submission by 2604:6000:110D:43FB:B052:8556:4787:3480[edit]


This person has a long-term standing in the arts community in excess of 20 years and has a more than adequate amount of recent verifiable and independent press coverage, both online and in print and radio, in recent years to justify inclusion in Wikipedia, based on the standards of notability.

2604:6000:110D:43FB:B052:8556:4787:3480 (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It will be re-reviewed by another editor. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note, this draft is currently going through a deletion process at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Thomas W.P. Slatin Nosebagbear (talk) 12:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

04:45:17, 14 December 2018 review of submission by Underlybill[edit]


Underlybill (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


So my submission was rejected for not being basically important enough. You though list Indiana defunct department stores. One of them was Brite-Way. Being from the area and era of the store, I wrote about the store. I would assume if you list something in one article, you would like to have a reference for that listingUnderlybill (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Underlybill, thanks for getting involved. It's reasonable to think that the red link for Brite-Way on List of defunct department stores of the United States means that an article is needed on the topic, but it's a little more complicated.
That list needs a source that says Brite-Way is a defunct department store in South Bend, Indiana. Wikipedia's policy on verifiability requires published, reliable sources. Even if you're sure from personal experience that something is true, you may not add it unless you can attribute it to a reliable, published source. (An editor broke that rule by adding it to the list without citing a source, which is why it has a citation needed tag. If a citation isn't provided, Brite-Way is likely to be deleted from the list.) A good source would be a local newspaper article. You might find one by searching on-line, or you might have to visit a local library and search issues from 1989, when Brite-Way closed. If you find a source, Help:Referencing for beginners explains how to add it.
A red link on a Wikipedia page means the topic might merit an article. Before creating an article (or removing the red link), one should research the topic to determine if it is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia as a stand alone topic). It appears, for example, that someone researched Fetla's in Valparaiso and concluded that although it is a defunct department store in Indiana (and thus merits inclusion on the list), it is not "important enough" to warrant an entire article, so they delinked the name. My guess is that, like Fetla's, Brite-Way is not notable, and should be delinked, but the only way to be sure would be to try to find sources that would demonstrate notability. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:08:24, 14 December 2018 review of submission by LaerkeM1[edit]


I do not understand why this site has not been published yet - why is it repeatedly declined? It does not differ from other alike and many links and references have been added. Please help me on this!

LaerkeM1 (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LaerkeM1: - it is frequently declined as the sourcing quality is insufficient. There are lots of sources but they are either a) Not independent (the company itself, or from one of the clients etc) or b) Not actually covering HOR - the company can't inherit the films' notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:52:48, 14 December 2018 review of submission by Revparker[edit]


"This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." That is the reason why my article was denied. However, multiple other similar articles have been approved for years. (My article is about an Continuing Anglican church.) The thing is, the nature of what I am writing about doesn't get much third-party citation: who writes about independent churches??

Here's my link as proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Episcopal_Catholic_Church

Now look at these other churches and see if this feels like discrimination to you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_Anglican_movement#Other_Anglican_churches

I am at my wit's end and need help!

Revparker (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your question has already been answered at the Teahouse. For future reference, only ask questions in one place. Thanks, JTP (talk • contribs) 15:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:15:44, 14 December 2018 review of submission by Revparker[edit]


After comparing my article to other similar articles about churches, I have added the "Unreferenced" template. I ask that either my newly created stub for the Episcopal Catholic Church or the "Unreferenced" original article please be accepted in light of many similar articles that have gone uncontested on Wikipedia for years now under the Continuing Anglican Movement.

Revparker (talk) 14:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on December 14, 2018 for assistance on Bobby Simpson submission by IrishKopey[edit]


Assistance is needed to add a picture to the article on Bobby Simpson. I have not been able to figure out how to do this. How does picture need to be formatted?

IrishKopey (talk) 17:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IrishKopey Now that Bobby Simpson (golfer) is an article, it is no longer within the scope of this specialized help desk (Articles for creation). But briefly, adding an image is a two step process: first upload it, then use it in on a page. I see that you've successfully uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org File:Robert Simpson, winner of two Western Open Golf Tournaments.pdf. Uploading an image in pdf format is unusual, normally one would upload a jpg. There is a dedicated help desk for image uploading.
After uploading, the picture tutorial can guide you through how to use the uploaded image in an article. Please consider asking any further questions about the process at the Wikipedia:Help desk, where volunteers will try to answer any question regarding how to use Wikipedia. Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for any help related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps! --Worldbruce (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:20:46, 14 December 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Gravitoelectrotensor[edit]


Greetings, I just had my first article: Draft:AI peer review declined for copyright violation. OK, but now I do not see the Draft article anywhere to edit and rephrase the reference to the Scientific American article content. How can I edit the draft to comply with guidelines?

Gravitoelectrotensor (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gravitoelectrotensor The blue-topped "Investigation of potential copyright issue" box on Draft:AI Peer Review is long and complex, but contains all the answers you need. You may temporarily read the original text through the draft's page history. Further down, the third blue-highlighted way to resolve the issue is to write new text that doesn't infringe copyright. Click the [show] link at the end of that line to see the steps to follow. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18:02:35, 14 December 2018 review of submission by Aryanshukla9936[edit]

I want to know the meaning of reliable content and why am i not able to publish this page anyone can google that clash night tv is a band spread over saavn itunes ayoutube and everywhere Aryan 18:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aryanshukla9936 (talk • contribs)

spread over various sites is not a WP:NMUSIC criteria. Legacypac (talk) 09:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:01:18, 14 December 2018 review of draft by Ryozzo[edit]


Is there a place to get co-authors. I have updated the Draft article and would like to discuss the updates or collaborate with someone to refine the article.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:S.7000-A_Real_Property_Tax_Law_in_New_York_State Thanks Ryozzo (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Ryozzo (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:05:02, 14 December 2018 review of draft by Danceawe[edit]


I am new to wikipedia. I have submitted my draft for review but if its not accepted can a professional take the information from my page and make a professional proper actual published page on Briar Nolet?

Danceawe (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too problems - it was a copyright infringment and written like an Advertisement. Legacypac (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2018_December_14&oldid=981367405"