User talk:Yami tan

This is Yami tan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ishaan Barde (April 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ishaan Barde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ishaan Barde, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yami tan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yami tan (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will edit the references in one week

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ishaan Barde (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As I told the creator in -help, they must disclose that they are a paid editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ishaan Barde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ishaan Barde, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 19:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Hi. Where is this "-help" venue you speak of? —usernamekiran (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IRC. CUPIDICAE💕 20:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

References need to be insterted into the text following the facts that the references support. The software automatically insertes a superscripted number in the text and creates a numbered ref list. David notMD (talk) 02:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Yami tan! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, how can i improve this article so that it can be submitted, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarang Nakade[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarang Nakade, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://sites.google.com/view/sarang-nakade/home. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
It contains a gallery in the userspace which consists chiefly of fair use or non-free images. (See section U3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot allow non-free and copyrighted images to be used on user pages, and user pages containing galleries of such images may be eligible for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarang Nakade moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sarang Nakade, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Gopal Puri[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shri Gopal Puri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains neutral point of view for the subject. It only occupies general information. Additionally it follows the citations criteria of Wikipedia. Please consider to not delete this article. I will improve it every month. Yami tan (talk) 19:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello Yami tan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yami tan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yami tan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a article writer and I'm contributing my skills and different informations to the wiki community. I'm not being compensated in any way for any of my edits. Yami tan (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm article writer and I'm contributing my skills and different informations to the wiki community. I'm not being compensated in any way for any of my edits. Yami tan (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then please explain how this and this are your own work. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've researched and gathered this information and I've used proper citations where i found the information. Since social media links are not allowed i didn't mentioned them. Yami tan (talk) 20:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't explain how those images are your own work. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a encyclopedia and i can write articles on any subject on it Yami tan (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The images is uploaded on Wikipedia common wizard. Yami tan (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got images from web source Yami tan (talk) 20:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i will remove the image. But the article is my own work and Wikipedia should not delete that. I'm requesting for articles for a month now. Yami tan (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the images i accept that the images are not my work. But the article is my own work.

Yami tan (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shri Gopal Puri for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shri Gopal Puri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Gopal Puri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my previous attempt i wasn't aware of the paid template of wikipedia. I tried to improve my article and inserted templates . Kindly review it with neutrality. Yami tan (talk) 17:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you accept a job as a paid editor on the basis that you are an experienced editor? PRAXIDICAE💕 17:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also the terms of use require you to link to the advertisement you were awarded and where you advertise your services. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can i do that? Yami tan (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By disclosing it on your userpage and including all clients you were paid to write about and also I would advise you to stop your disruptive editing. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a professional editor but i do not work online. I edit articles as per the people's will. I'm not creating anything for my client. I'm doing my job. Yami tan (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an outright lie and contradicted by your previous statements and other evidence to the contrary. Keep it up and you will find yourself blocked as it's a terms of use violation. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a learner for now. So i do my best to read and execute wiki page that is neutral and perfect for the terms and conditions of Wikipedia. Yami tan (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell? What I'm doing wrong. I'm try to learn. Yami tan (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you took any time to read the relevant policies I've given you previously and discussed with you on the help chat, you'd be aware. No one is going to spoon feed you the information so you can get paid by your client. Do the leg work yourself. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disclosed that I'm a paid editor as your advice now how i can disclose it on my user page.. can you suggest me templates? Yami tan (talk) 19:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the policy and terms and conditions and i removed the paragraphs and irrelevant subjects that are violating wiki terms. Yami tan (talk) 19:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me? Yami tan (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know you've helped me alot. I took days to resolve these issues of my article still it's not correct for wiki. Is it my fault or is it not a relevant topic for Wikipedia? Yami tan (talk) 19:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]