User talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive 111

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 105 Archive 109 Archive 110 Archive 111 Archive 112 Archive 113 Archive 115

Wikidata weekly summary #332

Thank you ...

... for improving article quality in September! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

FCS

Hi Andy, I know that you have had some past involvement with the RCS so I wonder if you can help me.

I've just created John Leigh (doctor), wherein it states that he was a Fellow of the Chemical Society. Try as I might, I cannot find a category for this, although we have Category:Fellows of the Royal Society of Chemistry. The CS was one of the organisations that merged to form the RCS. Am I supposed to categories him there? That would seem to be potentially misleading and certainly anachronistic. Should I create a new category?

Also, do you still have any contacts at the RCS? Their publications are behind a paywall but there are at least two mentions of a John Leigh in proceedings from 1889, which may well be an obituary or similar. I'm not spending £42 to find out but if you can't help then I may ask at WP:RX. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 07:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sitush: Practise seems to be to use the modern category; see for example Matilda Cullen Knowles. I would see nothing wrong with changing that, and creating a new category, then moving people to it as appropriate (some will be in both, of course). I have no ongoing formal relation with the RSC, but an email to them (FAO the librarian) should result in the info you require, or a copy of the relevant paper. Alternatively, see [[5]]. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks very much. I have created and at least part-populated Category:Fellows of the Chemical Society. I will have missed some out, I am sure. I will try the librarian as you suggest - taking up an RSC Gold slot for a one-off use seems a bit greedy of me. - Sitush (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

added JustlettersandnumbersL235
removed BgwhiteHorsePunchKidJ GrebKillerChihuahuaRami RWinhunter

Interface administrator changes

added Cyberpower678Deryck ChanOshwahPharosRagesossRitchie333

Oversight changes

removed Guerillero NativeForeigner SnowolfXeno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

23:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #333

Wikidata issue again

Hi, see User talk:Peter coxhead#Calandrinia corrigioloides for the latest on the problem caused by only 1:1 links at Wikidata. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I've posted a pointer to that, on the Wikidata 'Project Chat' page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm sure there must be a technical solution to the problem of picking up multiple language wiki links. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Notice

The article Sheridan Russell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable as any listed profession. BBC link is to a streamed song; archive link is to non-notable memoranda

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ScrpIronIV 12:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2018





Headlines
  • Albania report: Collections of Museums in Albania
  • Armenia report: GLAM+Wikidata
  • Australia report: WikiTour AU
  • Brazil report: Developing tGLAM: a landing-page generator for GLAM initiatives
  • France report: European Heritage Days; Linked data for archaeology; Paris: Edit-a-thon at Mobilier National
  • Germany report: History of Women and Democracy, Wikipedia-Culture-Ambassadors and two GLAM-on-Tour-stations in just four weeks
  • Macedonia report: Wiki camps in Macedonia
  • Malaysia report: Wikipedia for Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museum
  • Mexico report: Open GLAM Mexico 2018
  • Netherlands report: >20,000 press photographs 1940-1990 uploaded, GLAM Wiki Meeting, Aerial Photographs, GLAM-Wiki Manual & Wikipedia Course for Historical Societies
  • Norway report: Women in Red; Researhers Days 2018; The 2019 edition of #wikinobel
  • Poland report: Archival photographs and literary knowledge enrich Polish Wikipedia
  • Serbia report: Impact of GLAM seminars: Decentralization of GLAM activities
  • Sweden report: Wikidata P3595 Biografiskt lexikon för Finland; Student Project at the Nordic Museum; Learning about sources on Swedish Wikipedia
  • UK report: Botanical illustrations and Wiki Loves Monuments in Scotland
  • USA report: Back to school
  • Wikipedia Library report: Books & Bytes–Issue 30, August–September 2018
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata Tour Down Under
  • Calendar: October's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Get ready for November with Women in Red!

Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives



New: Religion Deceased politicians Asia

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #334

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Module value in infobox

Hey Pigsonthewing,

I was cleaning up the documentation at Template:Infobox television episode and noticed that the "module" value that you added in 2014 wasn't documented. Could you please explain what should go there and how it works so I can better understand it? Thank you! --Gonnym (talk) 16:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

@Gonnym: The same as in, for example, {{Infobox person}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

User:Ircpresident, or ACK!

Hey! could you help him "adjust" his user page so it does not cause someone to decline the unblock?14:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

It declares his interest. What "adjustment" do you think is needed? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Also @Ircpresident:, who should not be discussed without being notified. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The follow me could be interpreted as spamming, and lead to the unblock being declined, and I would like to see him unblocked.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:56, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Also, your user page is so cool, I thought you could give him some pointers on how to do it right,-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Oh, really? Come back to me on that when you've cleaned up all these: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=250&offset=0&ns2=1&search=%22follow+me%22. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Clearly, you don't understand what goes through an admin's mind when considering an unblock request. I did not want to hurt his chances at unblocking. It's all moot now. He's unblocked.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Clearly, you don't understand what goes through my mind. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Maaaaybe.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:31, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Pigsonthewing, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
  • ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
  • There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)