User talk:Nolan1scool

Welcome!

Hi Nolan1scool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! - FlightTime (open channel) 16:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello, I'm Glman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. glman (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at ...And Justice for All (album), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, sorry for the error. Do you know how I could provide citations so I can keep that information in there? Nolan1scool (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Katimavik, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Learning about citations

Hi there! I saw your Teahouse post and wanted to stop by. You've had the referencing/citation links shared with you, but I also wanted to offer some peer support if you'd like, while you work through understanding them.

Believe it or not, I have a whoooole library science degree, lol, and the minute details of Reliable Sources and referencing still intimidates me despite that degree! I'm trying to psych myself up to jump into it, because I know providing reliable sources as references is some of the most important work we can do for the encyclopedia. I understand allll the topics being discussed in the RS/referencing pages, it's just a LOT to process all together, so I definitely think it would help me to message back and forth with someone else who's learning too!

So, feel free to ask me any questions, either by pinging me here or going to my talk page, and I'll do my best to answer. Anything I don't understand, we can take to back to the Teahouse for clearer answers! I just think it's a lot less intimidating to go down this path with a wiki-buddy, so I wanted to offer. I don't have many things I want to *add* to the encyclopedia, either (I'm more of an editor/text-improver type) so maybe we could start by trying to find proper citations for some of the info you were trying to add to pages before!

Let me know what you think, and happy editing either way :-D ~Chelsea aka Chiselinccc (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hi Nolan1scool! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. glman (talk) 22:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop

Hello, please stop adding completely unnecessary text to prominent articles. Even worse, you're adding it in the lead section, which is supposed to summarise a page and also doesn't normally have citations. Basically all of your edits have been reverted, often not by me. If you continue your current editing pattern, you may be blocked. You might find the page about Guidance for younger editors useful ... basically please slow way, way down. Graham87 (talk) 04:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the notice. Which article are you referring to? Nolan1scool (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Taylor Swift have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Taylor Swift was changed by Nolan1scool (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963109 on 2024-03-04T12:48:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Swift, you may be blocked from editing. My Pants Metal (talk) 13:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Edits at Taylor Swift

Hello, I'm Hanif Al Husaini. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Taylor Swift have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 13:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 13:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I’m very sorry about the Taylor swift thing. That was my friend JJ that took my computer and did that. Could you re add my editing privilege? Nolan1scool (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

No. We've heard that sort of excuse before. And your reply to myquestion above shows that you really shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. Graham87 (talk) 17:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Has anyone told you you look a lot like Shaq? Nolan1scool (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Learn to treat people with respect. Didlidoo (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Graham87 (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rootless voicings in jazz (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rootless voicings in jazz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 14:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Nolan1scool! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 14:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)