User talk:John koprivne

Najwa is not lebanese american!!!! She is Lebanese, why do you keep putting American????

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! NOTNOTABLE (talk) 03:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John koprivne, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi John koprivne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello John koprivne, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Najwa Karam have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Your addition to Najwa Karam has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heya Masr Foundation (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heya Masr Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heya Masr Foundation (April 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heya Masr Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed content from Western Sahara without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 19:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Western Sahara. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Western Sahara was changed by John koprivne (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924758 on 2024-05-04T19:12:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 19:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This block is unfair as I was in the process of writing on the talk page the reasons why I deleted the content and suddenly I found myself blocked. The information I deleted is outdated hence incorrect. First of all, the article is fully biased as it does not give correct information about the conflict. Moreover, some of the words and sources used in this article are clearly biased. But most importantly, the information in this article is extremely outdated as it has been decades that Morocco controls the whole sahara region described as Western Sahara. I deleted the content so that readers don't see an article that I believe goes against Wikipedia guidelines. I was going to write a new accurate and up to date article that is truly unbiased. Furthermore, I am Russian so I really don't have any affiliation on interest in defending either sides in this dispute, I just really care about reporting with integrity (by being neutral) and following wikipedia guidelines.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John koprivne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here John koprivne (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a good reason to unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

John koprivne (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to being totally out of bounds, you are factually wrong. Your intended edits would make the encyclopedia inarguably worse. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Factually wrong, how? How do you know what my edits would look like? Wikipedia is not a place where you get to spread your opinions or political agendas. I know, I am factually correct, most of that article is biased and simply incorrect if you don't have enough information about a topic I'd suggest you stay out of it instead of arguing just for the sake of arguing. What makes the encyclopedia worst and the reason why it's viewed as a non credible source in academia is people like you who for some reason think they can not only discuss but also judge something they are completely ignorant about.

First, please sign your comments with ~~~~. Secondly, "it has been decades that Morocco controls the whole sahara region described as Western Sahara" is untrue. You are explicitly stating that you were going to put misinformation (disinformation?) into an article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love how you have full confidence in your ignorance. Do some research and you would see that the statement you're calling misinformation and even disinformation is in fact correct. But, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you're just sincerely misinformed because most of the google search results that come up about this topic are incorrect and again outdated. So I'll give you some help, here's another wikipedia article about the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic.

Look where the president of "Western Sahara" lives, Do you think that the President would be living in a refugee camp in Tindouf Algeria if SADR had any sovereignty over the Sahara?

Here's a published academic paper, discussing Cardiovascular Diseases in Morocco per region that has a map of Morocco that includes the whole area of Western Sahara as Moroccan: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-the-regions-of-Morocco-12-regions-17_fig1_355082014

My passion is traveling, I have been to Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia,..., and most countries in Africa. I wouldn't even be interested to write about something I'm not knowledgable in. I know for a fact that Morocco is who's controlling the Western Sahara territory because first I have simply been there. Second, I hold a bachelor's, and master's degree in political science and African studies so I know this topic by heart. John koprivne (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are ignorant about the situation, who wrote the articles here, what our policies and guidelines are, and how to effectively communicate. I recommend you read up on all of these before spreading your ignorance further. Suffice it to say none of this is the way to get unlocked. Even the mildest amount of background knowledge would tell you that Morocco do not occupy the territory east of the berm. Good luck in life. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John koprivne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here John koprivne (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a good reason to unblock you. If English is not your native language, please consider editing the version of Wikipedia in your native language. You'll probably understand what's going on better, such as recognizing text that you're supposed to replace with an actual reason.

This block is unfair as I was in the process of writing on the talk page the reasons why I deleted the content and suddenly I found myself blocked. The information I deleted is outdated hence incorrect. First of all, the article is fully biased as it does not give correct information about the conflict. Moreover, some of the words and sources used in this article are clearly biased. But most importantly, the information in this article is extremely outdated as it has been decades that Morocco controls the whole sahara region described as Western Sahara. I deleted the content so that readers don't see an article that I believe goes against Wikipedia guidelines. I was going to write a new accurate and up to date article that is truly unbiased. Furthermore, I am Russian so I really don't have any affiliation on interest in defending either sides in this dispute, I just really care about reporting with integrity (by being neutral) and following wikipedia guidelines. Sorry, the your reason here was a mistake in the edit. John koprivne (talk) 23:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

John koprivne (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John koprivne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is unfair as I was in the process of writing on the talk page the reasons why I deleted the content and suddenly I found myself blocked. The information I deleted is outdated hence incorrect. First of all, the article is fully biased as it does not give correct information about the conflict. Moreover, some of the words and sources used in this article are clearly biased. But most importantly, the information in this article is extremely outdated as it has been decades that Morocco controls the whole sahara region described as Western Sahara. I deleted the content so that readers don't see an article that I believe goes against Wikipedia guidelines. I was going to write a new accurate and up to date article that is truly unbiased. Furthermore, I am Russian so I really don't have any affiliation on interest in defending either sides in this dispute, I just really care about reporting with integrity (by being neutral) and following wikipedia guidelines. Sorry, the your reason here was a mistake in the edit.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

John koprivne