Jump to content

User talk:Jamalahmadpk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Jamalahmadpk, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Mako001 (C)  (T) (The Alternate Mako) 07:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revuze (January 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DMySon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DMySon (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jamalahmadpk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DMySon (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cricketers[edit]

Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia. For cricketers we don't user Category:Cricketers, instead we categorise them by nationality. Please feel free to join The Cricket Project. StickyWicket (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Camillo (January 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valdrin Azemi[edit]

Notice

The article Valdrin Azemi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket infobox teams[edit]

Hello. The cricketer infobox is reserved for teams a player has actually made a top-level appearance for. Please stop adding teams that someone hasn't played for. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for the feedback. Jamalahmadpk (talk) 14:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valdrin Azemi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valdrin Azemi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valdrin Azemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Bless moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pierre Bless, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 13:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the feedback. I will make the relevant edits. BTW I saw that you removed almost all the sources that I added. Those references were not OK? Thanks Jamalahmadpk (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback. I will make the relevant edits. BTW I saw that you removed almost all the sources that I added. Those references were not OK? Thanks Jamalahmadpk (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Pakistan Daily[edit]

Notice

The article The Pakistan Daily has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs reliable, independent, significant and original coverage from third-party sources to meet WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 19:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alina Alam has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alina Alam. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. But I do feel that she also deserves to have a Wikipedia page because almost all of the references and coverage is about her. Some of the articles do mention cafe as well but the majority of the coverage is personally about her. Thanks. Jamalahmadpk (talk) 07:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Pakistan Daily for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pakistan Daily is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pakistan Daily until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 17:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepak Ballaney[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepak Ballaney, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 04:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback but I believe that this page should not be speedily deleted because I think notability is not an issue as the article got references from highly renowned and reliable sites like New York Times, CBS News, Insider Inc and we can find several more online. I saw the CSD G11 tag as well and if that's the case, I am willing to improve the article. Thanks Jamalahmadpk (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitti Cafe has been accepted[edit]

Mitti Cafe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lopifalko (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mathieu Vouillamoz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathieu Vouillamoz. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 18:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamalahmadpk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I received this notification of block with the reason that I have used multiple accounts for editing. I created this Wikipedia account in January so may be I am not that much expert of Wikipedia but in these 3 months, I have saw enough cases about people using multiple accounts or doing paid editing and I know this is illegal. I am not sure how and why I was linked with other accounts especially "Mathieu Vouillamoz' because although I did tried to move the page "Lisa Camillo" (which was initially created by Mathieu Vouillamoz) to the main space after seeing her references (because I thought she was notable) but once that was reverted and declined, I didn't tried to move it again to the main space. If I was a paid editor, I would have made several attempts to approve the Wikipedia page of Lisa Camillo. I won't talk about other accounts because I don't know them and the "Guide to appealing" also says that "You are blocked because of what you did, not because of what others did" so I am just making my request that I am not involved in any paid editing and I haven't created any other account. A paid editor only work for money and he tries his best to keep the pages active but previously my pages got deleted and I haven't followed any illegal path to bring back those articles to the main space again and I always tried to follow the Wikipedia guidelines. There are also allegations that I (with the help of other sock accounts) tried to influence the "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pakistan Daily" but that's not correct because previously my article has been deleted after AFD discussion and I haven't tried to influence the voting process and the consensus was "Delete". :I got the "Extended Confirmed User" designation after 3 months of hard work and I won't do any stupid thing to get myself blocked. You might have your reasons to block me but I can present myself honestly that I only have one account. I am looking forward to your kind response. Jamalahmadpk (talk) 09:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you're are attesting that you have no relation whatsoever with any of the accounts listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathieu Vouillamoz/Archive and that you have nothing whatsoever to do with paid editing, I don't believe you. Within 10 days of creating this account, you created this article, fully formed with extensive use of intricate referencing, in article space. I believe that you are either involved in paid editing and have become affiliated with other paid editing accounts through WP:MEAT, or that you have operated multiple accounts. As such I'm declining your appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

    • Hello User:Ponyo. Thank you for the feedback but you mentioned that within 10 days of creating this account, I created this article, fully formed with extensive use of intricate referencing, in article space which I think should not raise any eyes brows or suspicion because anyone with some basic skills and with the help of tutorials can draft Wikipedia article. You can also see that I didn't create this page directly (Which I could have done easily) but I used the AFC process and I didn't try to follow any illegal way to move it to mainspace. If I was a paid editor then I would have done every possible thing to move this page to the mainspace. Please look into this. I will be really grateful. I am again saying that I do not have any other account. Thanks Jamalahmadpk (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alina Alam (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revuze (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answerly App moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Answerly App, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 01:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pierre Bless[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jamalahmadpk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pierre Bless, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alina Alam[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jamalahmadpk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alina Alam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Revuze[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jamalahmadpk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Revuze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Revuze[edit]

Hello, Jamalahmadpk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Revuze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Answerly App[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jamalahmadpk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Answerly App, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Answerly App[edit]

Hello, Jamalahmadpk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Answerly App".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alina Alam[edit]

Hello, Jamalahmadpk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alina Alam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamalahmadpk&oldid=1157158326"