User talk:InvictusImperator

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Cuppa! Smashdude08 (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Hello InvictusImperator. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Please help me with certain sections and completion of this article, many thanks. I have been getting information for about two hours however there isn’t some essential on the web so I decided to email ArtStation and I am waiting for them to reply.

InvictusImperator (talk) 20:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InvictusImperator, and welcome; do you have any specific question? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, InvictusImperator. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

A convenient shortcut to create a signature on talk pages is "~~~~" (four tildes).

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea on the review process or is there even one?[edit]

I have no clue on the basis of the review process or myself being in trouble of not completing it. --InvictusImperator (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArtStation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, ArtStation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. An (over)simplified explanation of the issue can be found at WP:42. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. If you strongly disagree about my decision and would like to have a normal deletion discussion instead, you may undo the move at any time, by moving the article back to its previous location. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree[edit]

Thanks man, :-) for doing that totally right call! — Preceding unsigned comment added by InvictusImperator (talk • contribs) 21:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

Thank you very much for the kind message and the cookie. To ask further questions, you'll likely need to use {{help me}} or my talk page directly, as I won't be notified of new questions if they only appear on this page here. Good luck with the article, and enjoy editing. A link I forgot to mention above is WP:The Wikipedia Adventure, which may be an interesting way of starting with Wikipedia, depending on your personal preferred learning style. Some love it, some don't like it for being an "adventure game" in a serious encyclopedia. Decide for yourself. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FUMBBL[edit]

The article FUMBBL has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable website. Google search results in just fewer than 100 hits, none of which are significant discussions of the site in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brand Logo ArtStation.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brand Logo ArtStation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FUMBBL for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FUMBBL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUMBBL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ArtStation concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ArtStation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ArtStation[edit]

Hello, InvictusImperator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ArtStation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 17:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alberto Mottesi[edit]

Hello, InvictusImperator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alberto Mottesi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]