User talk:Igottheconch

.

Line break for edit toolbar

You have a few responses at The village geek pump. I for one am not sure what you are seeking. Can you swing by there and explain please? fg^t_c 07:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

sure! Thank you! Igottheconch (talk) 21:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Zombie comedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dead Linger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dead Linger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --LemonTwinkle 09:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I've removed the tag for now to allow you to create a bit more, but I've also unpatrolled it to give someone else another chance to look it over. Legoktm (talk) 09:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dead Linger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of zombie video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rebirth: When Everyone Forgot! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ASF

Thomas Calvert McClary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ASF

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The General Staff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The General Staff

Hello, Igottheconch,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The General Staff should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The General Staff .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people from Potomac, Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Feldman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited How to Survive (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A Second Knock at the Door

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on A Second Knock at the Door requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jguard18 ^{Critique Me} 16:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

NOtification

I nominated Pilgrim of Eternity for DYK, but messed up the nomination (originally wrote myself as creator, sorry, thats not right), so you may not get any official notice. i havent been able to watch the whole episode yet, and didnt provide inline citations, so it may fail, but i want to alert you to it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

We got it. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Six By Sondheim

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Six By Sondheim, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-mondays-tv-highlights-six-by-sondheim-on-hbo-20131206,0,4807950.story.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Six By Sondheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Broadway, I'm Still Here, Merrily We Roll Along, Something's Coming and Jeremy Jordan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EigoMANGA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cryostasis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wounded healer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doctors and Counselors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Psych Central

The article Psych Central has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability of websites. I found just two vaguely substantive mentions of it, one about a business deal they were involved in, the other by a blog's "admin" (author unidentified) recommending the site to readers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Tom Wootton

Hello, Igottheconch,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Tom Wootton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Wootton .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, EagerToddler39 (talk) 23:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bipolar Advantage

Hello, Igottheconch,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bipolar Advantage should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bipolar Advantage .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, EagerToddler39 (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Bipolar Advantage

The article The Bipolar Advantage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject appears to be non-notable. Three articles were created in close succession: Tom Wootton, Bipolar Advantage and The Bipolar Advantage that have questionable notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EagerToddler39 (talk) 23:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Psych Central

Hello Igottheconch,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Psych Central for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. EagerToddler39 (talk) 02:39, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Igottheconch. You have new messages at EagerToddler39's talk page.
Message added 03:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

EagerToddler39 (talk) 03:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Removal of cleanup template from Business Plot

I was going through your edits and noticed that you recently removed a cleanup template from the article Business Plot without having edited the article. These templates "are to foster improvement of the encyclopedia by alerting editors to changes that need to be made. Cleanup tags are meant to be temporary notices that lead to an effort to fix the problem". I encourage you to make improvements to the article as you see fit before removing the template again. EagerToddler39 (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Psych Central for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psych Central is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psych Central until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Psych Central

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Psych Central requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://books.google.com/books?id=wEQy6xtbcN0C&lpg=PA11&dq=%22Psych%20Central%22%20-PsychCentral.com&pg=PA11#v=snippet&q=%22psych%20central%20answers%22&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Your addition to Psych Central has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is particularly about restoring the History section, a copyright violation, after I'd already removed it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bipolar Advantage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Enlightenment, Depression, NAMI and Stigma

Head transplant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sun News

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Bipolar Advantage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bipolar Advantage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bipolar Advantage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 04:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Psych Central

Greetings, saw your message. Unfortunately it looks like Psych Central was deleted due to copyright infringement, so I'm not sure an admin will be readily willing to restore it. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psych Central. If there are a few high-profile media stories about the website, it may be possible to craft a new article that would not be subject to deletion. Doing some quick looking, I'm not sure whether or not it could be done.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 01:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

• BTW, I am sorry about the frustration that led to your comment on the village pump a few days ago [1]. There are lots of folks here who don't mean to offend but have weak interpersonal skills. Unfortunately not every useful website easily meets WP:GNG.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 01:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Milowent please email me the article, or can you ask an adim to email it to me? Igottheconch (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

• I can't, I don't have access to it. I used my normal workarounds, checking Google cache and archive.org, and didn't see it there either.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

• so you are not admin? ok. thanks i will find someone else. appreciate you. Igottheconch (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

• Igor, an admin chimed in on my page, see [2].--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psych Central, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ramanujam and The Daily News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Psych Central at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 17 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Stepan Bandera page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Psych Central

Hello! Your submission of Psych Central at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DoctorKubla (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

• Igottheconch, you haven't responded to the above notice even though you have been active on Wikipedia in the interim. Generally, responses are expected within seven days of notification. As noted on your nominations entry, there are significant issues with your nomination, and if you do not respond within the next couple of days, it will likely be closed as unsuccessful. (Someone could potentially close it at any time.) I do hope we hear from you before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cecil G. Osborne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concordia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Your addition to Talk:Panther 21 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is about your reproduction of the 16 March 1990 New York Times article found at http://books.google.com/books?id=wBdOvs2THGEC&pg=PA351&lpg=PA351&dq=%22the+national+Panthers+party+did+not+assist+the+New+York+Panther+21%22&source=bl&ots=jxuBRNr8K0&sig=YfJfw-u_01HcLRnmNsPyD1KqjWI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MJRNU9PRGYyP0gGgsIGgAQ&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20national%20Panthers%20party%20did%20not%20assist%20the%20New%20York%20Panther%2021%22&f=false —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Solar Roadways

I can only refer you to what Dream Focus observed — rather than randomly acting by himself, Sbmeirow is acting upon what was discussed at the talk page. Please participate there. Nyttend (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Dead Linger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dead Linger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dead Linger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Desertarun (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cecil G. Osborne

The article Cecil G. Osborne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 01:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

"Lim1" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lim1 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § Lim1 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)