User talk:Glossy1718!

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Olive Young (company), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this, you did a good job of declaring your paid editing status on your user page, but you should also read WP:PAID and WP:COI. ~~In particular, you probably shouldn't be editing the pages you're paid for directly, and instead submit edit requests.~~ Struck my misunderstanding. EducatedRedneck (talk) 12:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC) EducatedRedneck (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't paid to edit the Olive Young page, I was only trying to learn how editing works in Wikipedia. And if I'm paid to edit only one page, do I still have to declare that I'm a paid editor for the rest of the pages I'm going to edit?Glossy1718! (talk) 01:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my word, you're completely right! You indeed do not have to declare your paid status for subjects which are not connected to your client. I somehow got it in my head that you were paid by Olive Young, which is wrong. I'm sorry about that! In that case, you're correct, you are allowed and encouraged to make WP:BOLD edits, as you did. That also means that WP:PROMO was not the right thing for me to cite for the revert; WP:DUE would have been more appropriate. I hope I didn't make things harder for you because of my misunderstanding!

For what it's worth, if you have any questions, feel free to reach out to me; I'm still relatively new, but I might be able to point you in the right direction. Again, my apologies for not reading your paid notice more closely, and thank you for being so forthright in how you follow Wikipedia policies; if everyone was like that, Wikipedia would be a better place! EducatedRedneck (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Glossy1718! (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mihee Lim has been accepted[edit]

Mihee Lim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lopifalko (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Je-geun Park[edit]

Hello, Glossy1718!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SailingInABathTub, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Je-geun Park, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SailingInABathTub}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 20:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeong Ho Lee has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeong Ho Lee. Thanks! Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've just edited the article as you proposed. Glossy1718! (talk) 20:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeong Ho Lee (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The current draft has to much of what we call puffery, for instance statement such as "His pioneering studies", "He was the first to identify", and "he was honored" as three examples. Please edit, removing anything which appears a little boasting and resubmit. A simpler, dryer version will probably pass.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeong Ho Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Glossy1718!! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]