User talk:Ldm1954

Draft:Etsko Kruisinga

Howdy, on my previous submission you mentioned to add more about his accomplishments and I have done so. Because you might be more familiar with this because of past review would you be available to review? thx. Deondernemers (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Some thoughts, with caveats that what I see is based upon Google's translation of the Dutch.

• https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/anro001bioe01_01/krui005.php has more information. For instance you could add one or two of his better known books.

Mention his grammar contributions in both Dutch & English

• Add information from that article about the archives -- useful to flesh him out.
• Do a Google search. I found https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846270.71 ; I currently don't have it but it looks like a decent review where you can find material. Also https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90004-9, there seems to be a fair amount of material.

It takes work! Ldm1954 (talk) 02:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Alright! I will put that in tomorrow or whenever I find some time. Thank you again Ldm1954 Deondernemers (talk) 02:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Addendum: I did not check your changes -- I should have. Much, much better than before. I think you can do a little more, maybe also add an infobox with an image as there seem to be public domain ones around (or ones you can upload to Wikipedia). Then resubmit. I won't review the resubmittal, but I will keep an eye on it in case you get a weird review (they happen). Ldm1954 (talk) 03:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Professor Jiann-Wen Woody Ju’s Wikipedia page

Dear Professor Marks:

I extend my sincere gratitude for your invaluable comments and contributions to Professor Jiann-Wen Woody Ju’s Wikipedia page. Your insights have been instrumental in shaping the edits I am currently making. Professor Ju is also searching for additional evidence to substantiate the records on the Wikipedia page.

I have a query regarding the inclusion of certain awards and elections, particularly for the newly ones that have not yet been updated on the respective organization's webpage. However, we possess proof such as the Letter of Election from the President of the organization. Considering Wikipedia's requirement for publicly accessible sources, would such documentation suffice for verification purposes?

Thank you immensely for your time and assistance.

Best regards,

User: zhuwenli Zhuwenli (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Since there have been so many declines already I think you have to get it right the next time, or reviewers may get fed up and decline with no option to resubmit. This means that you have to wait for the organization to post it, or the university to announce it publicly.

N.B., remember that awards must be major. An APS fellow is considered major as they have many thousands of members. A small conference or an NSF creativity award are not really major. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fiveling

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fiveling you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Clemens Burda

Hi there! Thank you for your constructive criticism of my submission. As you instructed, I have added relevant citations and removed all the peacocks. In addition to that, I also added a major award instead of the junior awards you mentioned.

Please, let me know. Sigma Spurion (talk) 23:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

It is definitely much better. It would help if you can find sources beyond Case Western for him, as some will consider his university a (weak) primary source. Also, while AAAS is a useful award, I am not so convinced that it is that notable.

I won't review the new draft, I will leave that to someone else. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)