User talk:Djjdwetherspoon

Welcome![edit]

Hello Djjdwetherspoon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

July 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page French house has been reverted.
Your edit here to French house was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/label/116894-Moveltraxx) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Music Sounds Better with You have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Music Sounds Better with You was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/release/13772039-Stardust-Music-Sounds-Better-With-You) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moveltraxx (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Which sources discuss the label indepth and are independent of subject? Also the lists need to go. They are unsourced and add little to the article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moveltraxx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your feedback - I will go back and check my sources to verify whether they are independent from the subject. My reasoning for the lists I was trying to demonstrate the label's output, but if you feel they are unnecessary I'll be sure to remove them from the article before resubmitting in the future.

Thank you for your help. Djjdwetherspoon (talk) 22:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Djjdwetherspoon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moveltraxx (August 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moveltraxx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moveltraxx (August 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All the content sourced to bandcamp needs to be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moveltraxx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moveltraxx (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moveltraxx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 08:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate you reviewing my draft article but I disagree about the notability criteria.

I have listed several references all independent from the subject; Bandcamp's editorial page, Beatportal Beatport's editorial page, Complex Networks, Fact (UK magazine) - all high profile reputable music publications.

In my opinion previous editors have simply glanced over the references, and for whatever reason, be it because they aren't familiar with music publications have simply dismissed my article rather than properly reviewing the sources.

If you could point to how the references listed aren't independent from the source (they were clearly written by editorial staff, not members of the record label) or how my sources aren't reliable that would be greatly appreciated.

As at this point it feels as though the previous editors are either being lazy or just overly pedantic, especially comparing my Draft article to other lesser known Independent Record Labels who have articles on the subject.

Thanks Djjdwetherspoon (talk) 20:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moveltraxx (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no attempt to remove inappropriate sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moveltraxx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate you reviewing my draft article but I disagree about the notability criteria. I have listed several references all independent from the subject; Bandcamp's editorial page, Beatportal Beatport's editorial page, Complex Networks, Fact (UK magazine) - all high profile reputable music publications. In my opinion previous editors have simply glanced over the references, and for whatever reason, be it because they aren't familiar with music publications have simply dismissed my article rather than properly reviewing the sources. If you could point to how the references listed aren't independent from the source (they were clearly written by editorial staff, not members of the record label) or how my sources aren't reliable that would be greatly appreciated. As at this point it feels as though the previous editors are either being lazy or just overly pedantic, especially comparing my Draft article to other lesser known Independent Record Labels who have articles on the subject. Djjdwetherspoon (talk) 21:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: L'Étranger (DJ) (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Discogs, YouTube (unless it is his own verified channel), and similar sites are not appropriate references and must be removed, please

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:L'Étranger (DJ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moveltraxx[edit]

Hello, Djjdwetherspoon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moveltraxx, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moveltraxx[edit]

Hello, Djjdwetherspoon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moveltraxx".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP[edit]

No need to announce that: an admin can clean that up, but now I have to clean up a bit more. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to the sarcastic comment here. I'm obviously going to remove my IP address and when editing I am required to add an explanation. Djjdwetherspoon (talk) 17:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ what makes you think I'm sarcastic here. You can't remove that: it remains in the history, but I removed it. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that but I do not appreciate the offensive language used here. Djjdwetherspoon (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: L'Étranger (DJ) (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No reliable secondary sources were added--only links to commercial websites.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:L'Étranger (DJ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 17:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:L'Étranger (DJ) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:L'Étranger (DJ). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:L'Étranger (DJ)[edit]

Hello, Djjdwetherspoon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:L'Étranger (DJ), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:L'Étranger (DJ)[edit]

Hello, Djjdwetherspoon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "L'Étranger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:L'Étranger (DJ)[edit]

Hello, Djjdwetherspoon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "L'Étranger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]