User talk:Dev Mahey

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Dev Mahey, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 00:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ravidassia/Ramdassia Sikh (Chamar)[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ravidassia/Ramdassia Sikh (Chamar) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravidassia/Ramdassia Sikh (Chamar) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mestsgains,

I want to know the reason why wikipedia decided to delete my article. Is it because that i have not put any refrence yet.

Thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dev Mahey (talk • contribs) April 27, 2018 (UTC)

Baba Sangat Singh[edit]

You have ceated an incorrect redirect. Please write an encyclopedic biography of the person or I'll rewrite your page to a redirect.Xx236 (talk) 11:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ramdasia[edit]

Your efforts at Ramdasia are being reverted because they are very poor. I have already mentioned some of the issues at Talk:Ramdasia but you appear to be edit warring and not responding there. Please read WP:3RR and note the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 08:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Thanks for now commenting at the talk page. I have moved your comments to the last section on that page because adding them to conversations that took place five years ago and which are way up the page is not particularly helpful and could lead to confusion. - Sitush (talk) 09:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaheed Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shaheed Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Ravidas Gurdwaras[edit]

Hello Dev Mahey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Ravidas Gurdwaras for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baba Sangat Singh[edit]

The article Baba Sangat Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Ravidas Gurdwaras for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ravidas Gurdwaras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ravidas Gurdwaras until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 10:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baba Sangat Singh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baba Sangat Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Sangat Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Ramdasia page[edit]

Wikipedia is not your private property that you are reverting even those topics who are added with proper reference and citations. My edit on Ramdasia's page was on the basis of research and i'm myself from the community. First refute what is wrong then revert it. ChaudharyRavidassia (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your references doesn't match with your claim

i am posting 2 of your references where there is no mention about ramdasia, you are just making stories without any valid point.....

https://www.epw.in/journal/2007/23/special-articles/bhakti-buddhism-ravidas-and-ambedkar.html

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/punjab/8-000-punjab-buddhists-majority-loyal-to-ambedkar-694124

there was no references provided for surnames

you intentionally removed government document which reflects proper caste classification Dev Mahey (talk) 21:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dera bhallan has nothing to do with ramdassia sikhs , this page is abour ramdasia chamars not synonymous ravidasia chamars....

lahori ram bali is different person and late lahori ram is different.

there is no legal validity of ravidassia religion is in india.....

its was ramvidassia who converted to buddhismm not ramdassia sikhs.... you provided clearly reflects this Dev Mahey (talk) 22:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ravinder Chauhan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravinder Chauhan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Chauhan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 02:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tej Ram Bagha moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tej Ram Bagha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. // Timothy :: talk 02:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gurdip Ram Bungar moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Gurdip Ram Bungar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Lakha moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ram Lakha. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurdip Ram Bungar (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mayor and councillor of a small local government area are not "inherently" notable offices under WP:NPOL. That is, they are not offices where everybody who holds them automatically gets a Wikipedia article just for existing -- they are offices where inclusion on Wikipedia is conditional on demonstrating that the person is a special case of significantly greater importance than most other mayors or councillors. But you haven't really shown that: all you've done is verify that he exists, which isn't enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurdip Ram Bungar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dev Mahey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Your edit to Bishan Dass has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) is not a compatible license. — Diannaa (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gurdip Ram Bungar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gurdip Ram Bungar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurdip Ram Bungar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DreamRimmer (talk) 04:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As he is a first dalit ( former untouchable ) who became the mayor of Gravesham like Lydia Simmons, who was the first black to become mayor of Slough.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lydia_Simmons

For Gurdip Ram Bungar, this is his second term as Mayor of the mentioned Council. Why this page should be on Wikipedia is because of his struggle being a dalit (untouchable) back in India and the U.K. and becoming Mayor of Gravesham.

Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ravived[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey,

Thank you for creating Ravived.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating the page! Please add categories to it to group it to other articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Illusion Flame}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ram Lakha[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ram Lakha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tej Ram Bagha[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tej Ram Bagha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gurdip Ram Bungar[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gurdip Ram Bungar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning ⚠️[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidasia. IMFWHO (talk) 05:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop being a casteist and stop distorting the Ravidassia page. You not only deleted the Guru Ravidass picture from the page but also continuously deleted a list of notable Ravidass people. The proper references have been provided for most of the eminent people. There are many other caste pages where you will find such a list, but casteist people like you only target pages where information about Dalits is provided. So I request that you please stop discrimination by showing your casteist behavior. Dev Mahey (talk) 06:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-Paste😆😆 IMFWHO (talk) 08:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ram Lakha[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ram Lakha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tej Ram Bagha[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tej Ram Bagha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gurdip Ram Bungar[edit]

Hello, Dev Mahey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gurdip Ram Bungar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gurdip Ram Bungar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gurdip Ram Bungar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurdip Ram Bungar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoraVoro (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people in Ravidassia[edit]

Hi Dev Mahey, I was wondering how you know if the people added to the notable list on the Ravidassia article belong to the Ravidassia religion? Jeraxmoira (talk) 09:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It's all based on the data available online, and a few of them are known. They are all Ambedkarites, and if you want, I can provide a source for their ancestral background. Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe ancestral background is irrelevant here. If you have the data, please cite it for each person you add. Original research is not considered reliable. Jeraxmoira (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ravidassia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guidance will try my best to provide proper referencing. Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 10:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in the source you cited does it state that Karam Singh Raju belongs to Ravidassia. Please stop adding this information without a relevant source. Jeraxmoira (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Malkiat Singh (IPS), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. —Wasell^(T) 12:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ishwar Das Pawar moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ishwar Das Pawar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it contains promotional-sounding language. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ad-Dharmi, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding people to the notable list of each sect/ religion without a source or unless it is stated in the BLP's article. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Thanks for the response. I linked an article Ishwar Das Pawar on the Ad-dharmi page based on the information provided in a weekly newspaper named Ambedkar Times. Please see the link.

https://www.ambedkartimes.com/AT-23-June%208,%202022.pdf

Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked it, thank you. It would be easier to verify if the same was cited on the BLP's article wherever their sect is mentioned. Jeraxmoira (talk) 09:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at K. R. Punia. Jeraxmoira (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ramesh Chander (diplomat) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ramesh Chander (diplomat), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 11:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Samir Jassal[edit]

Hello Dev Mahey, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Samir Jassal, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samir Jassal.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|LordVoldemort728}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 03:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

Please see WP:MINOR to know when to mark your edits as minor. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Darbara Singh Guru and Amar Singh (Punjab politician)[edit]

Please clarify how they belong on the Ravidassia list? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

On the Punjab Government website of the Punjab Scheduled Castes Land Development and Finance Corporation, both Ramdasia or Ravidasia terms are counted as single caste mentioned in serial number-9.

https://pbscfc.punjab.gov.in/?q=node/21

The government of India has also counted these two synonyms (Ravidasia or Ramdasia) under Chamar caste. Please see the link on the website of the Social Justice Department of India. Page 10 for Punjab and serial number 9.

https://socialjustice.gov.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/Compendium-2016.pdf

I will try to provide more references in the future to clarify the term ravidasia in future edits.

Kind Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That does not mean you can add their names to Ravidassia. You need to add them to Ramdasia. That is why we have separate articles for both. You cannot add their names to both Ravidassia and Ramdasia, right? Please stick to what sources say. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ishwar Das Pawar has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ishwar Das Pawar. Thanks! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohinder Kaur Midha for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohinder Kaur Midha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohinder Kaur Midha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nachhatar Pal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nachhatar Pal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachhatar Pal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not suitable, then delete all pages of India's entire legislative assembly member for each state. Dev Mahey (talk) 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dev Mahey. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ishwar Das Pawar (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I do not see any notability, please see WP:NJUDGE, also do not use references written by the individual himself as I can see many here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ishwar Das Pawar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 09:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashok Attri (diplomat) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashok Attri (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashok Attri (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 03:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]