User talk:Derekhal22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2023[edit]

Information icon

Hello Derekhal22. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Derekhal22. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Derekhal22|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am not being paid by the company Exeger, neither am I employed there.
I am grateful for any advice how I can write an good article, equal to other articles about (tech) companies. I focus on swedish companies, because some references are in swedish.
Also, as you can see, this is my first article. Derekhal22 (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Exeger Operations AB, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Derekhal22, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Derekhal22|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I can not use the {{Paid}} template, since I am not employed by or paid by the company of the articles. Is there a way for me to clarify this?
Also, I have in fact explained this situation once, after my earliest edits. Derekhal22 (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I really find that hard to believe. Mind you, you can have a conflict of interest without being paid. Drmies (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Exeger Operations AB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exeger Operations AB moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Exeger Operations AB, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exeger Operations AB (September 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Derekhal22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Exeger TM L1 Black RGB.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Exeger TM L1 Black RGB.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exeger Operations AB (October 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi--please use talk pages for communication about articles, not email. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exeger Operations AB (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 05:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]