User talk:Daisy404

AfD nomination of Timothy W Hodge[edit]

I have nominated Timothy W Hodge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy W Hodge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ravenswing 14:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Romaine Hodge[edit]

A tag has been placed on Romaine Hodge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 16:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Timothy Hodge[edit]

A tag has been placed on Timothy Hodge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Timothy Hodge[edit]

A tag has been placed on Timothy Hodge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Timothy Hodge, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Timothy Hodge[edit]

A tag has been placed on Timothy Hodge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 00:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Ross Singers[edit]

I have nominated The Ross Singers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ross Singers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ravenswing 01:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no deletion forThe Ross Singers[edit]

the ross singers page should not be deleted, i have seen proff and have knowledge of them.

--Daisy404 (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Musician artist agency[edit]

I have nominated Musician artist agency, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musician artist agency. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ravenswing 04:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Timothy Hodge[edit]

I have nominated Timothy Hodge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Hodge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 10:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Hodge, The Ross Singers Musician Artist Agency[edit]

Timothy Hodge, The Ross Singers, Musician Artist Agency articles should not be deleted, each time i look around u puting my articles up for deletions, without doing your homework, u need do research, i will do whats it takes to fight for these performers rights, they have a right to have there information on here, there fans need to know more about them,

--Daisy404 (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Timothy Hodge[edit]

I have nominated Timothy Hodge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Hodge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? nancy ^talk 17:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Hodge, should not be deleted[edit]

Timothy hodge pages should not be deleted

--Daisy404 (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Musician artist agency should not be deleted[edit]

musician artist agency should not be deleted

--Daisy404 (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have something to say about these deletions, the proper place is at the article's own talk page or at the relevant discussion at articles for deletion. You can get to the AfD debates from the link in the template on the page nominated for deletion. Once again, the reason this is happening is that you have not provided reliable sources as required by Wikipedia policy. Simply saying the pages deserve to exist accomplishes nothing, it is you who needs to do the homework if you want these articles to be kept. I would strongly suggest you read this page if you want to understand what Wikipedia is and how it works, as well as familiarizing yourself with the policy on sources. Beeblbrox (talk) 17:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried and tried to explain what the problem is to you, but you just don't seem to want to understand it. I think perhaps you would benefit from a having a Wikipedia mentor to help you. click here to learn more. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption.[edit]

Hey, I'm the user that User:Xenocidic felt might be able to adopt you. I'd be willing to do it. Just get back at me. --J p G r B 03:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.[edit]

I set up the appropriate template boxes. Now, is there anything I can help you with off the bat? Oh yes, and I wanted to add, you only need to type the ~~~~ only once. Your signature appears multiple times on in your contributions to talk pages. Unless this is your custom signature? --J p G r B 04:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts with User:Sunpop and User:Tr0167. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

i do not derserve to be block understand, i will get my articles posted, i refuse to go quite, i asked for help with my articles and didnt get it, i think its unfair --Daisy404 (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

Sorry, too soon after a block for me. Asenine 11:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daisy404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

becasue u are goin against my rights

Decline reason:

Sorry, your request does not address the reason for the block: abusing multiple accounts. You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, but I would suggest that you let this block expire. 48 hours for abusing multiple accounts is not too harsh. Use the time to look over Wikipedia policies like notability and verifiability, and then come back with a better understanding of how we do things. — Okiefromokla ^questions? 18:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i dont think its fair for me to be blocked, i will allow ppls to disrespect me,

--Daisy404 (talk) 17:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 17:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daisy404 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i did not u multiple accounts, i have a few people who use my pc as well and who use wikipedia, and i also feel that i was blocked so my articles could be deleted without me fighting for them, --Daisy404 (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC) i was not abusing the use of multiples accounts, did u ever think maybe more than one person, is using the same pc, for various reasons, --Daisy404 (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)dasiy404--Daisy404 (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The other accounts activities were similar enough to be considered sockpuppets, or at the very least, meatpuppets. You should be grateful that this account has not been blocked indefinitely for disruption. When your block expires, please work closely with your adopter (if he wishes to continue) and keep in mind that not all subjects are worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia. –xeno (talk) 13:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

starting an article for meJpGrB[edit]

i would like for my adpoter to do an article for me, JpGrB

--Daisy404 (talk) 13:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)dasiy404---Daisy404 (talk) 13:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you requesting? And a little side note, I usually don't watchlist others talk pages, so if there's a message for me, please use my talk page? --J p G r B 19:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

starting an article for me[edit]

JpGrB im unable to send u a message on ur talk page becasue they block me for no reason, but i want u to help me start a article about Timothy Hodge, or if u can start the artckle for me, id appreciate so much

--Daisy404 (talk) 00:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)dasiy404--Daisy404 (talk) 00:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Please understand that if you continue your disruptive behaviour of creating articles on non-notable subjects, you will be blocked again indefinitely. Your adopter is not here to create those articles for you. You need to show that you understand the policies here and that you can contribute positively, perhaps by adding content to existing articles. --Step hen 01:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is very true Daisy. If an article is notable and has references and such, I would be glad to help you. But an article is not notable just because of "television appearances". And once the blocking period is over we can possibly discuss this further. --J p G r B 05:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: New article.[edit]

I have a possible suggestion for you until notability can be determined. You can create a user sub-page/personal sandbox. It can be left open so you and other editors can fix it until it can fall under WP:MUSIC. Just a suggestion. I can will help in any way that I can, but I will not go against Wikipedia policy to create an article that, at this time cannot be classified as notable. --J p G r B 00:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good solution. Daisy, click User:Daisy404/Timothy Hodge to start editing the article and we'll see how it goes. --Step hen 01:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There you go Daisy, the user who posted above me has helped you get started. --J p G r B 02:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And P.S. you don't have to start a "new section" everytime you post on my, or someone else's, talk page. --J p G r B 02:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy if you edit the article link above it will not be deleted as it is in your userspace. It will need to be a good quality, referenced article to be moved into the Wikipedia mainspace. Let's see how you go. --Step hen 02:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the link was still red when I clicked here. So I've taken the liberty of putting the Infobox on the page. So here is the link. Just edit and fill in that much information since you seem to know it. Then begin by filling in some info underneath the box. I'll help you as you further yourself in the editing process. --J p G r B 21:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.[edit]

Yo, haven't heard from you in a little bit, I just wanted to see what's been going on. --J p G r B 10:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the page still needs a lot of work before it can go into the mainspace on WP. --J p G r B 21:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added tags to where we would need the extra references. As it is, the article is based on three references, of which two are self published news snippets, and one recounts a concert to only 500 people. Unfortunately, I cannot see Timothy verifiably meeting the requirements of WP:BAND or WP:NOTABLE until his album is released later this year and he gets more coverage. --Step hen 01:42, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy, I've already referenced some of the things in the article. And if you need to know how to reference you can look at some other articles, or even the references in that to see how to format them. And for now, I'd presume you can use just about anything as a reference, since it is not in the mainspace, but as more information becomes available it will need more reliable references before it can be even considered for the mainspace. I personally have been working on an article located here for several months and it it still not ready for the mainspace. Your article needs a lot more work. --J p G r B 01:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's great that you added them, but you should also learn to actually add refs so they aren't just listed there. --J p G r B 19:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'm saying, I mean, obviously I'll help you, but I will not do all the work for you. I will wikify a few of those refs, but to be a proper editor you'd have to learn to do this yourself. The articles listed in the reference section now only appear there because I properly referenced them within the article. (notice the <ref>[Article URL here (put a space) then add the proper title of the article] Accessed [[Enter month and day]], [[2008]]</ref> There is a little more to it, but that is the main part you need to know to add after whatever the statement is. --J p G r B 20:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And now that I look, I'm not actually sure how reliable those sources are. --J p G r B 20:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daisy404. You have new messages at Beeblbrox's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi.[edit]

Sorry I haven't gotten back to you in a bit, I just started my newest school year, and I've been trying to get things situated. Is there anything you need help with? --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 14:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes i do, i was wondering what had happen to u, i really neeed ur help, i have been goin threw it with this article, ive been goin on tryin to properly edit the article,but im not doing something correctly,because the red tag marks appear with i check the preview page, i have been going in and kept on tryin, but no luck, i mean all of the references are there, i made sure , everything that needs to prove what ever is there, i tried to do what u did, but no luck, help me out please

--Daisy404 (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, red links, just means there isn't an article for that specific link yet. And with the references, I said I will help you, I haven't a problem with that, but, as I stated before, I won't do the entire article for you. I hope you understand why. But I will look through and see what's going on, and, as I've stated before, I'm not sure exactly how reliable any of the sources you have are, but, seeing as it's a subpage, they should be okay for now, but before you try to move it into the mainspace (though not any time soon), the links required must be more notable. (No self-published sources, no forums, etc. To look at the criteria for reliable sources, I suggest looking through this page.) I hope this helps. And once again, I'm sorry I hadn't gotten back to you sooner. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 00:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

as i mention before all the resources are there, i search the entire internet for it, and im not asking u to do the entire article for me, im asking u to help me complete it, as i said, i went it and tried to add the refences, and there were errors messages --Daisy404 (talk) 18:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 18:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update.[edit]

Hey, just wondering where you've been and checking in to make sure everything is okay. Haven't heard from ya in a while. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 22:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i' have been so busy and im still tryin to get this article done, i still need a little help with it, i do appreciate u checking in on me --Daisy404 (talk) 03:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Daisy404--Daisy404 (talk) 03:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking in again, haven't seen you around these parts much. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 21:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey how have you been , i just dont know what else to do regarding this article user:daisy404

Perhaps it just isn't notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. Not everything is, but one day he may become notable enough and you'll have one up on the other people. If you're still interested in Wikipedia as an overall concept, you should contribute to the many more articles on any given topic and you can then come back to it as time progresses and notability is established. If there's anything I can help you with in this regard, do not hesitate to contact me. I'm on here just about everyday. Best regards and happy editing. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 01:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]