User talk:CanonNi/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, CanonNi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teamfight Manager (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teamfight Manager and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 02:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, CanonNi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kline • talk to me! • contribs 02:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Soong Ching Ling Kindergarten

The article Soong Ching Ling Kindergarten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not satisfy WP:NORG or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Chengjiaqiao, Shanghai moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chengjiaqiao, Shanghai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Shanghai Art Academy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shanghai Art Academy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 08:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your user page

Hi CanonNi, I'm Primefac. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Primefac (talk) 08:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I understand. Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
28		The Cyber Shinobi (talk)	Add sources
534		Shanghai Metro (talk)	Add sources
654		Wanrong (talk)	Add sources
332		Titoism (talk)	Add sources
1,611		Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) (talk)	Add sources
10		Al Edwards (politician) (talk)	Add sources
9		David Trubridge (talk)	Cleanup
226		Hindutva boycott of Bollywood films (talk)	Cleanup
11		Vertical banner (talk)	Cleanup
120		Leadership Council of Afghanistan (talk)	Expand
4,306		Chinese Communist Party (talk)	Expand
58		Cardigan Mountain School (talk)	Expand
29		Lunghua Civilian Assembly Centre (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Stray Little Devil (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3		Goin' a Buffalo (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,305		Maoism (talk)	Merge
5,606		2024 Iran–Pakistan border skirmishes (talk)	Merge
464		Eurasian carp (talk)	Merge
2		Pondicherry International Film Festival (talk)	Wikify
52		History of the People's Republic of China (2002–present) (talk)	Wikify
135		History of the People's Republic of China (1976–1989) (talk)	Wikify
3		Tsang-gi Ni (talk)	Orphan
1		Jymoo Zhou (talk)	Orphan
83		Palm Kingdoms (talk)	Orphan
22		Greens Farms Academy (talk)	Stub
4		Guilin Road station (talk)	Stub
23		China Today (talk)	Stub
3		Roskilde Håndbold (talk)	Stub
42		St. Luke's School (Connecticut) (talk)	Stub
4		Chenxiang Highway station (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Zheng Shen Min Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zheng Shen Min Party logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CanonNi. Thank you for your work on Remembrance Day (Hong Kong). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CanonNi. Thank you for your work on Dishui Lake. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs much expansion. I added a couple of references. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambu Lab (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bambu Lab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paradox Development Studio timeline

Template:Paradox Development Studio timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- ferret (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Typo on your userpage

I fixed a typo on your userpage, hope that is OK. I also answered here. Have a nice day, Polygnotus (talk) 09:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

You should bookmark this link. It is a list of most recently active administrators. Polygnotus (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. So if I need to contact an administrator in the future, I could just leave a message on one of their user talk pages? CanonNi (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Yep. They can help solve most problems. If there is a wider discussion/more eyes required you could post to WP:ANI. Polygnotus (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you so much! CanonNi (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edit summary on SAS

Your recent edit summary claims that that reference is 'generally unreliable' without elaborating on why. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and don't know much on this subject, and failed to see where the problem is. I wish you could elaborate on what made you say so. Hym3242 (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for pointing the problem out. It was my mistake, as I blindly removed the source as it was marked by the unreliable script as "generally unreliable". I've reverted my edit. Thank you for asking! CanonNi (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning removal

Hello, saw that you were reinstating warnings on User talk:Snap-OnToolGuy that the editor had removed. Not sure if you already knew this, but editors can remove notices like those from their talk page, per WP:BLANKING. Cheers. Lynch44 (talk) 02:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me. I didn't know about it prior, and I'm sorry for my careless mistake. CanonNi (talk) 02:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Untitled (seperated from previous section)

Did you silly person Tones are in the days (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Could you clarify what you're trying to say? CanonNi (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@Dinkar 108 involved in Edit war in different articles.

Hey @CanonNi This is to inform you that user @Dinkar 108 whose edit you just reverted on the basis of WP:UCR is involved in an edit war and is doing same king od content removal from different articles. Just look at his contribution in Paliwal Sanadhya Brahmin , Saryupareen Brahmin and Hemu. He is probably a sockpuppet of @Hemraj108. Mahishya (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me. CanonNi (talk) 09:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Now when he is warned about getting blocked, he is doing it with his sockpuppet @ajju109. Check the pattern of his edits on Brahmin Sanadhya Brahmin Paliwal . He is a confirmed sockpuppet made for the purpose of vandalising wikipedia articles. Mahishya (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I have reported the account here. CanonNi (talk) 10:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I appreciate your work. Mahishya (talk) 10:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

No problem! Again, thank you for informing me. CanonNi (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

This guy himself is sockpuppet of @Andy Murray and using my name with other user claiming me a sockpuppet. Just check @Andy murrey & @Mahishya edits both are same one account joined wiki today for vandalism and other joined 4 days ago for complanied. Ajju109 (talk) 10:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring. If you believe he is a sockpuppet, you may report him at WP:SPI. CanonNi (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

I never indulge in edit war and I am just reverting his vandalization. And I don't know how to report. Ajju109 (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

@Ajju109 You have been warned by @NoobThreePointOh to not to remove any content and you made another account without caring for wikipedia rules and still vandalising different articles without any explanation. If that's not the edit war, i don't know what is. Its a clear edit war from your side while trying to manipulate the admins. Mahishya (talk) 12:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

WP:IPC

Go read that instead of adding back in meaningless "this song has appeared in [some random place]" platitudes. 184.162.200.211 (talk) 03:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Just because you believe certain parts should not be included is no reason to blank the entire section. If you believe they should be removed, please discuss on the talk page. CanonNi (talk) 03:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

If you feel there's any of those that is more than the trivial "This song appeared in X" (as are almost all of the examples) or similar "Song was recorded by X" or "X other song uses the same melody", you're free to go and look for sources to back it up. As it stands, the page you linked to also gives plenty of "reasons for content removal", including "unsourced information" and "irrelevant information". So no, I don't believe "certain parts should not be included", but rather the "the whole of the affected section should not be included", which is why I consequently removed the entire section. 184.162.200.211 (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

WP:UCR states that, "There are various reasons for removing content from an article. Regardless of the reason, it should be described in the edit summary. If there is any doubt the removal may be controversial, or if it has been restored following a previous removal, it should be discussed on the page's talk page prior to removal." Please start a discussion on the talk page if you wish to remove the section again. CanonNi (talk) 03:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

"it should be described in the edit summary" - you not reading mine is not a me problem. The long list in the British Grenadiers article is the archetypical example (something Wikipedia has such a bad rap for, it's even a well known fact of internet culture, i.e. the mention on xkcd) of bad (and almost entirely unsourced) "in popular culture" content. As I said elsewhere, songs being sung is pretty much par for the course and including every instance of it would be very indiscriminate and irrelevant. 184.162.200.211 (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Minor notification

What's up, CanonNi? Just letting you that after signing a fellow editor's guestbook here, you forgot to sign by adding 4 tildes which produces your signature and time in UTC. Realised it was probably a little error so I fixed it for you. See you around! Volten001 ^☎ 17:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Volten001, thank you so much for fixing that! CanonNi (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

You're most welcome...👍👍💯 Have a great Easter weekend! - Volten001 ^☎ 02:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

You too! CanonNi (talk) 03:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Why did you do that?!

Why did you revert my glorious edit?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!!?!?!??!!!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!?!?!!!?!!?!!!? Diddykong69 (talk) 05:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Because it was vandalism. CanonNi (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

AFC/C

Please review the submissions which you've mistakenly declined. 43.224.235.7 (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

The submissions were declined because their subcategories don't exist. Also, please stop pinging me with "Please review. The." Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Please review your scripts such that slightly malformed submissions would not be mistakenly declined. 43.224.235.7 (talk) 13:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for resubmitting. I have accepted the requests. In the future, please make sure the pages in the proposed categories exist. CanonNi (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:17th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging

Category:17th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:16th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging

Category:16th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Millennia (video game) has been accepted

Millennia (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I will continue work on the article. CanonNi (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello CanonNi, and thank you for your edits to combat the editor currently engaging in edit war in the Black Sea slave trade-article.

The editor Someone Qırımlı are currently engaging in persistent vandalism of the article. They edit the article both from anonymous IP-adresses, as well as from their account, which had barely been used for anything than for editing this article.

They erase and remove referenced information describing the slave trade of the Crimean Khanate, referring to everything descriging the slave trade as non neutral "Russian propaganda", and either erase the entire topic from the article, or replace it with content describing the slavery as benevolent.

I wonder if the article can be protected somehow, or if the user can be blocked from edititing it? They clearly violate the rules of bias, vandalism and edit warring, but as a contributor I mostly write, and and know less about what can be done in these situations. Perhaps you have more knowledge as how do adress this? I have limited time dealing with this (I am travelling soon). My best greetings--Aciram (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

PS: They now also appear to emply a sock puppet: AzaqQara. --Aciram (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry but I will respond to your message later - it's getting late here where I live. Thanks. CanonNi (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I understand. No worries at all: I may not be able to be that available myself for a while, since I am due to travel, but I thought I should at least direct the attention of a serious user to the problem. I suspect this is going to be a long term problem, unless the user is stopped. They have now attempted to start their own article about the issue, "The Crimean slave trade", to further their opinion. The article appears to be appologetic to slavery in the Crimea, which is perhaps not a suprise considering their non-neutral edit warring. I do hope the article is deleted. --Aciram (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, the user seems to have started a discussion on the article's talk page about his recent edits, which other editors, such as Wikishovel and Draken Bowser have opposed. In addition, the editor in question has been seriously warned for his actions, as Draken Bowser says, "Again, you need to argue the source material and display a fundamental understanding of our rules. This is a difficult topic and needs to be discussed calmly. You need to collect your thoughts and slow down your posting or I will have to request that you be blocked to calm things down." So if the user continues changing content to his preferences, he might be blocked for vandalism and/or editwarring.

Thanks for reaching out to me, and I really appreciate your efforts in combating vandalism and protecting Wikipedia. Again, Thank you! CanonNi (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Irate Gamer

Hello, CanonNi,

I'm not sure why you created this talk page as there is no article here and hasn't been since 2008. So, there is no need for a talk page for a nonexistent article. These just get deleted through speedy deletion because they are unnecessary. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Liz. I created the talk page as part of an accepted request on WP:AFC/R, but the page itself was blocked from creation from 2008 and only the talk page was successfully changed. CanonNi (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

You reverted this

Dearest editor,

I saw you reverted here on Agricultural pollution. Well, I'm was about reverting it as well but remembered the input wasn't bad and doesn't seem like copyvio and maybe the editor may be taking to cite it (or that they don't know got to cite). I was about giving them tips on that before I saw your edits. Please clam down little and know that IP's are humans too. They may not have sources it but reading it makes sense and the article in question looks essay (..I). Just a reminder! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. I'll be more gentle from now on. CanonNi (talk) 01:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Your recent editing history at Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are way over 3RR and against the consensus in the talk page section. There's no way there is consensus for the present tense, that's for sure. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm so sorry for breaking the 3RR rule. The reason I reverted the edits is because they seemed like vandalism, as the accounts, such as Thatguy099 and Contributer2024, were newly created and felt like sock puppets of Happydays924. Again, I'm very sorry for violating the 3RR rule and will stop changing the article. CanonNi (talk) 04:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Then you need to read WP:NOTVAND, WP:AGF, and WP:DBQ. I once made the mistake of glossing over all of these, resulting in WP:BITEY behavior. I don't anymore and you shouldn't anymore, either. Reading other threads on your talk page shows that this isn't the first time others have had to talk about this with you so please refrain from reverting vandalism until you are sufficiently well-acquainted with what is and isn't vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Upon further review, one of the edits indeed was rather unconstructive, namely this one, but the others were (mostly) in good faith and thus not vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the guides. I will read them fully and stop reverting edits until I have a full understanding of vandalism-related policies. Again, thank you for informing me and I'm sorry for my unconstructive reverts. CanonNi (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:18th-century Roman Catholic churches in the Canary Islands has been nominated for splitting

Category:18th-century Roman Catholic churches in the Canary Islands has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, CanonNi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Caution

Hello, CanonNi,

Please be careful when using editing tools like those for disambiguation pages. You created some broken redirects that needed to be fixed. You are responsible for all of your edits so please double-check and don't depend too much on the editing tools. Use your own judgment. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I'm new to using the tool and have made some mistakes that I'm completely responsible for. I will check all my edits made using such tools from now on, and thank you for fixing my edits. CanonNi (talk) 03:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Categories

Please, review my requests at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Categories. 202.134.10.142 (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I'm currently busy and will review the requests later. Alternatively, you can try contacting other active editors at AfC/C. Thanks. CanonNi (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

@CanonNi: just visit last 2 requests. 202.134.10.142 (talk) 11:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

The requests have been reviewed by @Eejit43. CanonNi (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppet @Dinkar 108 is back

Hey @CanonNi, I want you to know that sockpuppet master @Dinkar 108 is back with another Sockpuppet @Prominister. Just look at his unconstructive edits with same pattern on same pages Paliwal, Hemu , Kannauj. [Paliwal] [Bahun] [Kannauj] and [Hemu]. He is vandalising these pages with same pattern as @Dinkar 108. Brahaspatya (talk) 12:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

In short, I don't think the user is a sock. See my comment on the investigation for reasons why. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

I have seen it sir. You need to check his disruptive edits on Kannauj and Paliwal where he removed authentic sources same like @Dinkar 108 . His account date is also from the same time of Ban on @Dinkar 108. I informed you about this because you are the most active here when it comes to sockpuppets. Please investigate into this. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll look into it and will comment on the investigation later.

Also, thanks but I'm definitely not active with sockpuppet investigations. I've only ever participated in a few, and I mainly do maintenance tasks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for it. I will wait for it. I also request you to make Checkuser request. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not a CheckUser and probably never will be. See this list for active CheckUsers. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Its saying that this page of checkuser list does not exist. I request you to mention some active Checkuser or experienced Sockpuppet investigator here if you don't mind. Thanks. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

My mistake. See this link instead. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

As of 18 April 2024, the following editors form the CheckUser team on the English Wikipedia:

Appointed community checkusers

Alison, Blablubbs, DatGuy, Dreamy Jazz, EdJohnston, Ferret, Girth Summit, Ivanvector, Materialscientist, Mz7, NinjaRobotPirate, Oshwah, Ponyo, Reaper Eternal, RoySmith, Spicy, SQL, ST47, Stwalkerster, Vanamonde93, Versageek, Yamla, Zzuuzz

Current arbitrators

Aoidh, Barkeep49, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Firefly, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, L235, Maxim, Moneytrees, Primefac, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720

Former arbitrators

AmandaNP, Bradv, Callanecc, Courcelles, Doug Weller, Drmies, GeneralNotability, Joe Roe, Jpgordon, KrakatoaKatie, Ks0stm, Mailer diablo, Mkdw, PhilKnight, RickinBaltimore, Risker, Salvio giuliano

Others

Some Foundation staff members (prohibited from use by internal policy except in rare cases), Wikimedia Ombuds

The list above is served from Template:Functionaries. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks alot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahaspatya (talk • contribs) 13:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Sock

Hi! CanonNi , check thiw SPI , one of the sock , you are talking on talk page now using other account for vabdalising thr articles. Donald567 (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I really don't mean to sound rude but please leave me alone with the Indian caste edit wars. I don't care who is or isn't a sock, and to be honest, you sound like one too. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 07:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

IP users asking about usernames.

Hi, CanonNi. I notice that you have answered two queries about usernames on the Teahouse from IP users with, essentially "You are an IP user, so you haven't got a username". (That's not your exact wording, but that's the sense I took from it). In both cases, reading between the lines, I think the message is from somebody who has an account, but either they've forgotten it, it's blocked, or they've just forgotten to log in. Your answer is not wrong, but if I'm right (and I might not be) it's not very helpful to them. ColinFine (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about my reply in this question. I misunderstood the question and will pay more attention to the wording in the future. Thanks for reminding me. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 23:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Your signature

What is with your recent signature change? It makes it difficult for people to leave you a communication. David notMD (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Really? I left the (talk|contribs) in my signature. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

My sig ...

...Got old and fighting my phone as well. Four of Sixteen (talk) 09:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

No problem. Just remember to sign posts with ~~~~ in the future. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Sockupuppet investigation

Hello CanonNi, and thank you for this sock puppet investigation: [1]. This user now has a fourth (?) sock puppet: The user: Frankovsky S may be another sock puppet: [2]. I am a bit unsure how to handle the matter, since I am not that familiar with these things. Perhaps you know better how to add this account to the investigation? My best greetings--Aciram (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Note: the user claims that the three accounts are all three different individuals, who all have the same issues with the article subject. I am not certain how this affects the investigation.--Aciram (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

It seems that Wikishovel has added Frankovsky S to the investigation. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 01:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

A Cookie for you!

Thank you for signing my guestbook!

Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm honored to be the first one to sign it. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 01:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)