User talk:BINK Robin

Welcome![edit]

Hi BINK Robin! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BINK Robin (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monolith Inc. has been accepted[edit]

Monolith Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 05:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! BINK Robin (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sonita Lontoh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonita Lontoh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonita Lontoh (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ew3234 (talk) 03:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katie Harbath has been accepted[edit]

Katie Harbath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review @Vanderwaalforces! BINK Robin (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Lerer (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The NYT article is ok but New York is mostly an interview and Wired is mostly about Thrillist and the portions about Ben rely heavily on what he says.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Lerer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BINK Robin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Johnson (executive) (May 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Johnson (executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BINK Robin thanks for the paid editing disclosure and the use of the three best sources. All three sources you mentioned are primarily interviews with Will, so fail the WP:INDEPENDENT criteria. Could you link three more sources that are not interviews? Qcne (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne: Hi there! Thanks for reviewing the draft and leaving this feedback. I'm happy to chat about sources. I have a question, to make sure we're on the same page. Can you explain a bit more about what part of WP:INDEPENDENT you're applying? I believe Chicago Tribune, Fortune, and Investor's Business Daily all qualify as WP:RS. I tried to avoid sourcing content to quotes, since quotes are WP:PRIMARY, instead focusing on the prose written by journalists in those articles. These articles aren't Q&A, and of course many sources use quotes from the subject. To help me evaluate other sources, at what point do you feel an article goes from an "interview" to a profile or feature? Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @BINK Robin.

I agree those three sources are from reliable sources, but the issue I have with them is although they aren't straight forward Q&A interviews, they really do seem to be just presenting what the CEO says about his life and career without very much independent analysis, discussion, interpretation, or comparison.

- Chicago Tribune looks to be derived fully from an interview with Johnson. There's brief detours into data but I don't think it's enough to really call it independent. It feels likechurnalism.

- Fortune is okay, though it's still an interview but does have some reflective commentary.

- IBD is better with indepth analysis of leadership etc. But, again, it's based primarily on an interview with Johnson.

The latter two sources could absolutely be used to cite his career and philosophy and such, but we need to establish notability first. To establish notability we need sources which are not primarily derived from an interview with Johnson. We're initially not interested in what the subject has to say about themselves, but what a source secondary has to say about the subject.

To be honest I think we're actually pretty borderline on this one. A couple more secondary sources and I think you'd prove notability.

Hope that helps. Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 19:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne, thanks for the extra analysis of those sources, that is super helpful insight! I’ll look around at what else is available and come back. When you say a couple of secondary sources, are you thinking more towards full profiles or would shorter articles / secondary articles where Johnson is one of several subjects be adequate at this point? Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 20:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be either, it depends on the source and the content. Happy for you to link some and I'll have a look sometime tomorrow. :) Qcne (talk) 20:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne Sounds good, I’ll ping you when I’ve got more sources for you to check out. Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne: I'm back with a few more sources to chat about. Here are a couple of articles I didn't include in the draft, but am curious to hear your take on:

Optimist Daily
Good News Network
I'm also curious what your thoughts are on the Kellogg profile. I didn't include that in my initial top three because it's his alma mater, but I do think it's written more in the format you're looking for.

Okay, let's start with those three for now. Appreciate you walking through these with me. Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first two sources are similar to the IBD source, in that they are based on interviews but still provide some analysis.

The Kellogg profile isn't independent but could be used to source parts of his career, education etc.

We're lacking any articles with critical, in-depth analysis, from a third-party perspective - but I wonder if there are any?

I think the addition of those three would push the draft into notability territory, and I would be happy to accept on that basis however. Qcne (talk) 17:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne Sounds good, that’s how I used the Kellogg profile, and I’ve just added the other two sources to the draft. If you have any other thoughts or questions, let me know! Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 18:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted that now :) Qcne (talk) 19:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, it’s been a pleasure working with you! BINK Robin (talk) 20:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Johnson (executive) has been accepted[edit]

Will Johnson (executive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 19:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]