User talk:Abigbagel

Neocollyris apiceflava moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Neocollyris apiceflava. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neocollyris anulata moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Neocollyris anulata. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arnold Fornachou.[edit]

Hello Abigbagel! Your article, Arnold Fornachou, has been moved back to draftspace due to a lack of reliable sources. The article was not speedy deleted, so you can work on the draft, adding more RS so it may be accepted into mainspace. Happy editing! Industrial Insect (talk) 00:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused on what I should do. Could you give me a suggestion? Abigbagel (talk) 00:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna be completely honest; After re-reading the new sources I've lost faith in the notability of the subject. Maybe Ernest Hamwi would be a better article subject than him? Industrial Insect (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So how do I delete this page? Abigbagel (talk) 01:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft? Open a Miscellany for deletion or tag it with a speedy deletion template such as {{Db-g7}}. Industrial Insect (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Db-g7}} is the usual method for this scenario, so it's best to use that one. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made another draft on Ernest Hamwi with the same links which honestly don't think it's a good idea and I'm just confirming that it's a bad idea Abigbagel (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say make it into a redirect into Ice cream cone. The story of Hamwi's alleged creation of the cone, according to at least the times article, is the most popular origin for the cone, so I think that'd work. Industrial Insect (talk) 01:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant the source links. I used the same ones. Abigbagel (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

Heyo! Rarely does any new editor write such a neat article a week after registration. Thanks for being bold with your first few edits and articles and for responding and getting better with feedback. The hardest part of becoming a Wikipedian is the first hundred-ish and you're hopefully almost past that :D Looking forward to your next article and happy editing! Justi yaya 12:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also, cool username :) Justi yaya 12:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Abigbagel! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Justi yaya 12:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of You Move Me (Company)[edit]

Hello Abigbagel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged You Move Me (Company) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 02:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leslie Joe (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leslie Joe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 02:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abigbagel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 02:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Abigbagel! Your additions to Alan Tiegreen have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leslie Joe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie Joe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Joe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 23:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deer Lake School moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Deer Lake School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Single source to the school website does not show notability. Moving to draft space to allow creator time to provide additional references showing WP:NCORP. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 07:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iragberi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexee Trevizo[edit]

The article Alexee Trevizo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable WP:CRIMINAL, and the crime article was deleted four months ago following WP:Articles for deletion/Artesia, New Mexico infanticide case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikishovel (talk) 07:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexee Trevizo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexee Trevizo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexee Trevizo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 12:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2023 Sweet Something burglary[edit]

The article 2023 Sweet Something burglary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. This is an absolutely bog-standard break and enter that happened to make the news because the thief did something quirky. Zero indication of any encyclopedic significance, or any lasting coverage or effect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sweet Something for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sweet Something is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Something until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chikn Nuggit (December 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chikn Nuggit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 20:48, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chikn Nuggit (December 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Seawolf35 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

TV tropes is not a reliable source. A lot of the sources are just routine press releases and do not establish notability of this subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chikn Nuggit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seawolf35 ^T--C 20:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steven Aalders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middleburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rogelio Andaverde for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rogelio Andaverde is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogelio Andaverde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. Thank you for your work on Tinkertown Family Fun Park. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. Thank you for your work on Rod Johnstone. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. Thank you for your work on William J. Lashua. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. Thank you for your work on Stephen Budd (criminal). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work. Did a preliminary review during NPP. IMO, it does not meet wp:notabiltiy requirements under any of GNG, events or biographies. Probably should not be an article. I'm just leaving this note for consideration without taking any action.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. Thank you for your work on Robert Finch (yacht designer). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neocollyris anulata[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neocollyris anulata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ernest Hamwi[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ernest Hamwi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leslie Joe[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leslie Joe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sophia Roberton[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sophia Roberton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Pizza Meter for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pizza Meter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pizza Meter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92^Talk 19:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brandon Moore (criminal)[edit]

The article Brandon Moore (criminal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CRIMINAL, only routine local coverage about the crime, nothing particularly exceptional about the case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 19:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Neocollyris anulata[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neocollyris anulata".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neocollyris apiceflava[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neocollyris apiceflava, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ernest Hamwi[edit]

Hello, Abigbagel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ernest Hamwi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]