User talk:216.49.181.128

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

May 2009[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Washing and anointing, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Tony Stewart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Boracay Bill (talk) 22:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Internet slang has been reverted, as it appears to intentionally introduce incorrect information. Please do not continue to do this; such edits are considered vandalism. Thank you. —Snigbrook 19:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jerry Krause, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jerry Krause was changed by 216.49.181.128 (u) (t) making a minor change censoring content (Wikipedia is not censored) on 2009-07-01T21:59:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gay News, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ash (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Koine Greek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ash (talk) 07:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hellenistic civilization, you will be blocked from editing. Ash (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of fictional demons worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. -sesuPRIME 21:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Abce2|Free lemonadeonly 25 cents! 18:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Strategic planning . Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 00:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 01:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kingdom of Israel (Samaria) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hellenistic philosophy, you may be blocked from editing. A Macedonian, a Greek. (talk) 02:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Piast93 (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Random comments about others beliefs[edit]

Leaving statements like "I have learned for myself that your beliefs are not true" on user talk pages (picked seemingly at random) is inappropriate here at Wikipedia; this is especially disconcerting in that these messages are coming from an IP address belonging to the LDS Church. It might be less of an issue if this was merely a one time incident, but this seems to be reoccurring pattern, happening nearly monthly since the middle of 2010 (January 2011, Dec 2010, October 2010, September 2010, August 2010, another in August 2010, July 2010).

Please stop: these actions do not benefit the LDS Church, nor those WP users who receive these messages. Given your IP address, these posts could be misconstrued as official actions of the church itself, and not merely personal expressions coming from a misguided church employee/volunteer. This is coming across more like the actions of the protesters that show-up for General Conference &/or at LDS pageants, and it is shameful for a believing member of the LDS Church to behave in this manner.

Perhaps reading Elder M. Russell Ballard’s speech given at Brigham Young University Management Society in Washington, D.C., April 19, 2008 on how to use the internet to share the gospel would be a good idea: does he talk about disparaging the beliefs of others as an effective/useful activity? How about in his book Our Search for Happiness: An Invitation to Understand the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? How about in Preach My Gospel? (Hint: no, none of these use or recommend this approach). -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 20:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per this little bit of random trolling on my talk page, good for you. But as advised above, this isn't what wikipedia is for. Do it again, and we can go to WP:ANI or WP:AIV to get you blocked for trolling. Consider this your last warning on the matter, as it seems you have been warned for this exact thing several times. Heiro 22:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per this repeated bit of religious trolling [1], you have been reported to WP:AIV. Heiro 18:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Message from a Wikipedia administrator alerted by a vandalism report: this is a final warning to whoever is adding these talk page comments. As you do it at fairly long intervals, a short block would have no effect; and as there are some users making constructive editrs from this IP, I am reluctant to impose a long block. However, if this nuisance continues, there will be no choice. So before you do it again, consider this: although they may make you feel good, assertions that other people's beliefs are not true have no effect on them except to irritate, and if you persist will result in a long block which will prevent constructive users of this IP from editing. So please stop. JohnCD (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even as I wrote this message, another administrator was deciding that enough was enough. Still, bear it in mind after this block, because if there has to be another it will be longer. JohnCD (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for repeatedly making inappropriate personal comments about other editors in violation of Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Playboy Mansion, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gothic alphabet with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Science and the Bible with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mephtalk 18:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Gothic alphabet. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 18:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Repeated long term vandalism such as: here, here, and here.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Gaius Cornelius (talk) 03:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Isarra (HG). I noticed that you recently made an edit to Evolutionary developmental biology that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, -— Isarra (HG) ༆ 20:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Seven Archangels with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Artificial intelligence, you may be blocked from editing. SchreyP (messages) 07:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Criticism of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Adjwilley (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Smalljim. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Austria, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  —SMALLJIM  16:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. — MusikAnimal talk 18:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emotional detachment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Madisonville, Kentucky, adding a person whose notability has not been established, has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Madisonville, Kentucky constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. See also Wikipedia:Notability. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Military of Moldova may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


National varieties of English[edit]

Information icon In a recent edit to the page William Wallace, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 01:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Sixth Sense, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that in this edit to Ephraim Hanks, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MBlaze Lightning T 16:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ephraim Hanks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop blanking this. Explain on the talk page why you think these references should be removed or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ephraim Hanks, you may be blocked from editing. You should also read WP:BRD and WP:EW. Meters (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Carthage Jail. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 22:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Martin Harris (Latter Day Saints), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hal Boyd (January 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wait, you deleted the content on the draft and want to submit an empty one?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 216.49.181.128! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spencer W. McBride (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sweyn Forkbeard, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 06:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spencer W. McBride[edit]

Information icon Hello, 216.49.181.128. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spencer W. McBride, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spencer W. McBride[edit]

Hello, 216.49.181.128. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spencer W. McBride".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:216.49.181.128&oldid=1142814281"