This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article feels like it was edited by the subject or someone close to them[edit]
I just put up a possible advert notice on this page because it looks like it was written to promote the image of the subject, mainly through an overly detailed and narrative-style personal life section, as well as non-neutral language in the career section. I'm relatively new around here but if someone else wants to take a glance at it, I see the two most recent edits before mine (both anonymous ones) appear to have added most of the content in question. I'd love to hear anyone else's thoughts on this. --Mrobinson1997 (talk) 17:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Need to Understand Reference Named: Clark, 2014[edit]
This article has one reference named: Clark, 2014 that has no further explanation if it's a website link, publication, eBook, Journal or anything else and this reference is used multiple times. Can someone look at it if this is really a link/reference, and I am not able to see it or it's not a reference and just added by someone so we should remove it. Thank you.
I believe it refers to Reference #2: an article from The Atlantic that probably originally had page numbers as referred to in the many Clark references. There's a way of connecting the article with the refs, but I'm not good at that, so I'll leave the "help" template in the hope that someone who is more knowledgeable can fix it. If no one responds, I suggest you ask at the WP:Help desk or the WP:Teahouse.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@IsrarKazmiSyed: (and @Bbb23:) Yea, it looks like it would originally sourced to the print version of The Atlantic, hence for the page numbers, but it looks like it's been amalgamated in to a much easier to deal with online article. I'll re-do the references - RichT|C|E-Mail 02:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
