Jump to content

Talk:Women's empowerment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jenny1004jeon. Peer reviewers: Katrina0118.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jhy0815.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Iosundare.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ngdana. Peer reviewers: Varshanekkanti.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definition. Measurement. Methods[edit]

I am thinking about adding a definition to "women's empowerment" since it doesn't have one yet. I will also attempt to add to the measurement section regarding critiques and elaborating the GMI. I will also be adding to the methods section soon. I think some reorganizing might be due. let me know.

Rbuell (talk) 08:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I restructured the contents, so let me know what you think about the new organization. I also included a new section: ongoing projects, so any feedback would be appreciated! I don't think I'll do anything to the measurement section, but I'll definitely keep my eye out for what's going on! I have reworded the "Role of Education" section, but feel free to make your own changes to it as well. Let's keep each other company! Jenny1004jeon (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article requires a lot of work. I just removed an unsourced statement: «without women's empowerment, women wouldn't feel equally important to the process of development as men». Men writing about what women supposedly feel is hardly helpful. Nemo 05:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of work needed[edit]

There is a lot of work needed on this article, to turn it into an encyclopaedic format rather than the personal essay it currently reads as. It is currently not within Wikipedia's guidelines of neutrality and a lot of the article seems only vaguely related to Women's Empowerment specifically, and is more about societal sexism in general. I do not have time to rewrite the whole article but if anyone keen does, it would definitely be worth doing!

Cardamom tea (talk) 13:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cardamom tea. I've started working on the tonal issues on the page. Gender Roamer (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gender Roamer! Much appreciated. 81.106.30.110 (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're Cardamom tea? You're welcome. Now I have more rephrasing to do. Gender Roamer (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All right. I gave the page thorough editing. As of this post, it looks like this. I also removed the essay warning, but the tone still sounds a bit like being preached to. Maybe that's just part of the tone that comes with the subject. So if someone wants to add that tag again, I'll accept it, but I don't know how to completely fix that side to the topic. I think, though, that my editing of the page improved it a lot. Gender Roamer (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Edits from a class (?) coming? I'll stick with the page to keep tonal issues at bay. Gender Roamer (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a class: Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/UC Berkeley/Global Poverty and Practice (Spring 2021). Gender Roamer (talk) 21:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, seems to have lots of edits by a random class... not sure they improve it much... Cardamom tea (talk) 15:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Caotc (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Taylorjones0611.

— Assignment last updated by WGST320 (talk) 01:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-02[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aleeexxxaaa (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Allyarice.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY4[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 November 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Arianna Szn (article contribs). Peer reviewers: GraceCaccamo29, Daunyzn.

— Assignment last updated by Ctysick (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Social science[edit]

Raising consciousness 183.87.94.64 (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 20 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Haydenrandolph (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Aksgpp3131 (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How are additional 58 million and 235 million statistics calculated?[edit]

Can anyone help? I'm trying to work out how the following statistics are calculated: "If half of small-scale producers benefited from development interventions that focused on empowering women, it would significantly raise the incomes of an additional 58 million people and increase the resilience of an additional 235 million people."

Reading the overview document [1] and the full report [2] I see a meta-analysis of impacts achieved by 24 projects funded by IFAD (p187, and Appendix 4), which show a 4.56% increase in income and a 19.03% increase in resilience for projects with a women's empowerment focus (i.e. decision-making power over income and/or resources attributed to women only or jointly with men is at least equal to the aggregated mean value (for all projects), which I suspect is a different (looser?) criterion than that used elsewhere to classify only 6% or projects as being focused on women's empowerment). I guess the 4.56% and 19.03% results are applied to statistics about small farms (the report specifically mentions over 80 percent of the estimated 570 million farms worldwide are smallholder farms of less than 2 hectares citing [3]). It is also assumed that half of such smallholders are reached by gender mainstreaming interventions and the other half are reached by interventions treating gender as fundamental. But from here I don't see how to calculate the additional 58 million people for increased income and 235 million people for resilience.

I've re-produced the table produced by the meta-analysis (with additional comments describing the indicators) of the the different impacts of projects without a women's empowerment focus compared to a women's empowerment focus. I'm not sure if it would be helpful to add it to the article:

No women’s empowerment focus projects

Women-empowering focus project

Indicator Projected
number of
people
Percentage
of total
beneficiaries
Projected
number of
people
Percentage
of total
beneficiaries
Difference
in projection
between projects
with women’s
empowerment
focus and others
Predicted
increase in
percentage
points of people
that achieved
results beyond
threshold
FIES (Food Insecurity
Experience Scale):
At least 10 percent
more food secure
53,133,009 47.49 59,239,076 52.95 6,106,067 5.46
HDDS (household
dietary diversity):
At least 10 percent with
improved nutrition
(diversified diet)
976,061 0.87 11,375,355 10.17 10,399,294 9.30
Income:
At least 10 percent
increase in income
68,774,573 61.48 73,880,395 66.04 5,105,822 4.56
Market access:
At least 20 percent
improved market access
65,039,137 58.14 60,476,286 54.06 -4,562,851 -4.08
Productive capacity:
At least 20 percent
increase in production
63,061,939 56.37 56,564,368 50.56 -6,497,571 -5.81
Recovery from shocks:
At least 20 percent
improved resilience
33,371,174 29.83 54,661,170 48.86 21,289,996 19.03

Corsac Fox Kazakhstan (talk) 13:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ The status of women in agrifood systems - Overview. Rome: FAO. 2023. doi:10.4060/cc5060en. S2CID 258145984.
  2. ^ The status of women in agrifood systems. Rome: FAO. 2023.
  3. ^ Lowder, Sarah K.; Sánchez, Marco V.; Bertini, Raffaele (June 2021). "Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated?". World Development. 142.