Live at Third Man Records (Billie Eilish album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Billie Eilish, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Billie Eilish on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Billie EilishWikipedia:WikiProject Billie EilishTemplate:WikiProject Billie EilishBillie Eilish articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
The release sentence should be swapped with the recording one in the order
"It was recorded at an acoustic live show with her brother" → "The album was recorded during an acoustic live show with Eilish's brother" with the target
Remove wikilink on Third Man Records
"It was officially released as Eilish's first live album on" → "It was released by Third Man Records on"
"The record received a major drop on" → "Live at Third Man Records experienced a major release on"
"debuting at number 55 on the" → "debuting at number 55 on the US"
"selling 13 thousand copies in that week." → "selling 13,000 copies during that week."
Sure you can't add another sentence to the second para since it is too short?
On hold but the track listing needs to be sourced more than anything else, or else I am not sure if this may be able to become a GA, sadly. Good luck though, I am glad to have been part of your ever-growing experience! --K. Peake 20:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Peake, I cannot find a source anywhere where it shows the length. Not even the vinyl shows the lengths. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Ultimate Boss You need a source that verifies that being the track listing, even if the lengths are not provided. --K. Peake 07:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Peake, you can go ahead and fail the GA nomination. I am having some issues right now with some editors and I think they might complain about this becoming GA. Thanks a lot for all the reviews you have done for me. You are truly the best editor on this website. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Ultimate Boss Are you sure about the fail since the track listing has now been proven it is able to be sourced? --K. Peake 07:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Peake, yes I am sure. Bilorv is going to whine about this becoming GA. I just recommend you fail it so we don't have problem with them. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 20:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@The Ultimate Boss: I am not going to take sides between you and Bilorv because I do not know about the issues, though I will ✗ Fail this article per user request to be safe. --K. Peake 01:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]