Talk:Hi-Point C-9
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Feed Problems?[edit]
I don't believe that the Hi-Point has a reputation for feed problems. And the footnote supplied does not go to a reliable source, but to a discussion forum. Also, by clicking on the supplied link & searching that page, no mention of feed problems was found. IMHO this sentence should be removed. (EnochBethany (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC))
What about reducing the importance of the "feed issues" by adding "It has been reported by some owners on forums, . . . but no pattern has been identified." I own one, and have never had a problem with it, but I have read the debates Zebadoba (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Move things?[edit]
The latest revision is good, but I'm curious about having that moved to a critism, or its own paragraph in the first section. Thoughts? Dreg102 16:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreg102 (talk • contribs)
Is the YC9 actually available?[edit]
This article claims so, but its citation leads to an article from years ago that says it's PLANNED to be ready by the end of 2019. Oktayey (talk) 02:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)