Wikipedia talk:Fourth opinion

This is a failed proposal.

Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please do so below or initiate a thread at the village pump.

Text copied from 3O[edit]

I admit and declare that most of the text on this page was copied from WP:3O. However, I don’t see a reason that this is wrong, because the only difference between 4O and 3O is the number of original disputants, so the content on the project pages should be the same to avoid confusion. Therefore, I am reusing and adapting the content under CC BY-SA 3.0, giving full credit to Wikipedia and any editors of the 3O page, and lastly invoking WP:IAR. Also see WP:CWW. MrSwagger21 (talk) 22:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Village Pump[edit]

A discussion about the addition of Fourth Opinion as a means of dispute resolution is ongoing. See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal to add 'Fourth opinion' as a means of dispute resolution. MrSwagger21 (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate use of draft namespace?[edit]

~~See this enquiry.~~ Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC) No longer relevant. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal failed[edit]

This proposal, having gained no traction or consensus, has been marked as failed. Please do not list disputes as they will not be answered. See Dispute Resolution for other dispute resolution options. — TransporterMan (TALK) 17:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]