Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 9 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 10[edit]

01:11, 10 March 2024 review of submission by Emmykeys001[edit]

in writing articles Emmykeys001 (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emmykeys001, your draft is highly promotional and entirely unreferenced. It is not appropriate for this encyclopedia. Read Your first article. Cullen328 (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04:18, 10 March 2024 review of submission by Job R You Tshavis Victorious[edit]

The only way I could see the point is to get Job R You Tshavis Victorious (talk) 04:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Job R You Tshavis Victorious: what? ltbdl (talk) 04:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft seems to have no content at all. Please read WP:YFA. ColinFine (talk) 17:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:17, 10 March 2024 review of submission by Poplopoa[edit]

why?? Poplopoa (talk) 05:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@poplopoa: the draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. deleting the rejection notice will not change that. ltbdl (talk) 05:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:54, 10 March 2024 review of submission by 219.74.85.151[edit]

Hi, our draft has been declined twice and we would really appreciate any advice on this. The feedback given on this article was that it reads as an advertisement. Could you specify in what way does the article appears as so? Is it due to the lack of sources or the general tone of the article? Also, on the matter of sources, we cited from a variety of other sources apart from our own. Hope to hear back soon, thank you! 219.74.85.151 (talk) 06:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to log in to your account. Who is "we"? If you work for this organization, the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing disclosure; please also read conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08:44, 10 March 2024 review of submission by RashidB123[edit]

I have added several independent sources to confirm the notability of the person, however, the draft has been rejected again. Can you please help me to identify the gaps/redraft to enable me get the approval.

Thanks for your help RashidB123 (talk) 08:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has been rejected there is nothing further you can do, you are not notable in Wikipedia terms. Theroadislong (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:13, 10 March 2024 review of submission by 77.102.77.218[edit]

How can we get this draft looked at again for publication? There is a lot more information now 77.102.77.218 (talk) 09:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we'? user accounts are for single person use only. Theroadislong (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The draft was rejected last week. This means the the rejecting reviewer (@331dot) had come to the conclusion that sources sufficient to establish notability simply don't exist.
The sources you have recently added, even if they were properly formatted citations, rather than external links, would do nothing whatever to alter that, since not one of them is indpependent of Quinn.
Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:55, 10 March 2024 review of submission by Wilfie66[edit]

Hi Can you tell me if my article has been submitted for review or do I need to re-submit? I see that a couple of editors made some changes on March 3rd but these don't seem to be reflected in the status of my article. I'm new to all this so would appreciate any help please. Wilfie66 (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you put an IP address where your draft title, Draft:Soulla Petrou should go, but as indicated on the draft, it was successfully submitted. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:14, 10 March 2024 review of submission by Snigdhakm[edit]

Hello Wikipedia Team. Not only this article, there are many other articles of many other eminent actors of Bengali Film Industry in Wikipedia. They are truly required to be mentioned here. We do need a lot of help of you all to add them up here.

Apart from that I have put all the true and possible references of this article to be established in Wikipedia. Mayukh Mukhrejee is an eminent actor since his childhood and is a multi talented person, whom the Bengali film industry knows well.

Thanks for your kind help in advance. Snigdhakm (talk) 20:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Snigdhakm. You have not demonstrated notability through the use of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. Please read WP:NACTOR carefully. Qcne (talk) 21:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]