Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 January 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 19 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 21 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 20[edit]

01:47:22, 20 January 2023 review of submission by 98.97.34.148[edit]

You did not look into the draft. 98.97.34.148 (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unsourced track listing for a clearly non-notable album, and it has been rightfully rejected. --Kinu t/c 02:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:56:09, 20 January 2023 review of draft by 86.185.82.189[edit]


86.185.82.189 (talk) 10:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There,

I attached the wrong link to one of my references and my page for James Begbie was rejected due to a lack of credible sources. I have since altered the citations for your review.

The editor that rejected the page confirms in his bio that he looks for 3 credible sources and I believe this page now contains them:

Reference 1: Is taken directly from the archives of the Uruguayan Football Association and is published on their website - this proves that Begbie played and scored in the match on 17/04/1974. This could be verified by the Uruguayan FA in Montevideo.

Reference 2: Is taken from the Scottish Junior FA website and proves that James Begbie played in the match 1971-1972 final at Hampden Park, Glasgow, in front of 14,000 fans.

Reference 3: Is a story taken from the The South China Morning Post and there is a picture further down in the article that shows and labels James (Jim) Begbie with the Hong Kong FA Cup in 1975. This proves that Begbie won the domestic cup in Hong Kong and the reporter from the South China Morning Post (Nazvi Careem) can verify this.

Please let me know if this sufficient or if further work is required.

14:11:49, 20 January 2023 review of draft by TigerBeats[edit]


Hello. I don't understand why this article has been rejected after such a long wait. I added sources to six books, which is rather a lot more than your average article, and I have references to multiple well established newspapers and periodicals in the entertainment space. Of these, most are in-depth, all are reliable, all are independent of the subject, and all are secondary unless Wikipedia has invented a new definition of the term. There are links to two primary texts -- actual artistic works, which is not forbidden, as far as I know. Aside from an IMDb link and Mubis link, there are just two links to blog posts by well-known genre bloggers. Is that why this has been rejected? Can I delete those, wait another three months, and... see results?

TigerBeats (talk) 14:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" has a specific meaning, that resubmission is not possible. Declined means that it may be resubmitted. You have done well to document appearances of the character; however, there is little coverage as to why the character is important or significant according to independent sources. 331dot (talk) 16:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:48:06, 20 January 2023 review of draft by Mhijazi[edit]

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hi admin, I have worked on my draft again. Please check if it's acceptable now.Mhijazi (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mhijazi (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:21:37, 20 January 2023 review of draft by TonyTheTiger[edit]


I was not aware that a submission decision was pending when it was evaluated. I had not actively submitted the article. That being said, I thought the article already had sufficient sources to document WP:N. Many of the articles that are focussed on my sister as a subject have been deemed as not sufficiently independent of the source. I had been given the indication that other editors supported its notability at WP:COI. I don't think much else is out there right now. If this is WP:TOOSOON, I'll check back later, but I had thought I should continue refining it before I even attempted to submit it. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An uninvolved IP, submitted my incomplete draft prematurely (while it still had the {{underconstruction}}) tag on it, resulting in a decline. Is it possible to roll back the clock on this submission?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]