Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 February 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 16 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 18 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 17[edit]

07:19:39, 17 February 2023 review of draft by Jaisongeorgephilip87[edit]


Jaisongeorgephilip87 (talk) 07:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

Ive given enough data for my submission sasilekha nair profile and you are rejecting that because of the early life section. So I am removing the section now as i don't have any proof for that. if i get any anything later, i will add it later on.

@Jaisongeorgephilip87 Did you take that picture of her, with your own camera? David10244 (talk) 09:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please answer the WP:COI/WP:PAID inquiry on your talk page. Slywriter (talk) 20:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I took this photo years back when I was in her dance performance. Jaisongeorgephilip87 (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So you appear to have a conflict of interest in that you know her and you have still not removed the spam links to her business from the draft. Theroadislong (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
Actually I don't understand which ones are spam links, all references Ive added are from the internet.
I you don't mind, can u pls help me removing the spam links. Jaisongeorgephilip87 (talk) 19:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found one link that appears to be the website down and I've removed
Can you pls approve it now Jaisongeorgephilip87 (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jaisongeorgephilip87 the external links are not the only issue. Sites like OnManorama are not a reliable source. Per their own About Us page, "The website provides a platform for talented people to showcase their products and skill to the world", which means they are a marketing/promotional site with some news. S0091 (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:43:25, 17 February 2023 review of submission by J777D[edit]


J777D (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC) 11:43:25, 17 February 2023 review of submission by J777D[reply]


12:34:29, 17 February 2023 review of submission by Curtmarsalis[edit]


The entry, Kandiid is a valid software app that is noted and duly verified across all mediums. Kandiid is registered under South Carolina register and is making a social impact globally. Kandiid and its owners have been featured in Forbes, Entrepreneur and various other media outlets. In addition, the platform has scored various awards from highly reputable organizations that judge apps in general. I ask for a review on the premise of its merit. Thank You in Advance Curtmarsalis (talk) 12:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Curtmarsalis The existence of the app or its validity is not at issue. The issue is that notability has not been demonstrated. Most of the sources seem to be interviews with the app creators or press release type stories, which are not independent sources. This is why the draft was rejected, and will not be considered further at this time. 331dot (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Niche industry awards typically do not contribute to notability unless the award itself merits an article, like Academy Award, Pritzker Prize, or Nobel Peace Prize. 331dot (talk) 16:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:04:49, 17 February 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Abhisheksuvarna17[edit]



Abhisheksuvarna17 (talk) 17:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Abhisheksuvarna17 you do not ask a question but I suggest reading through all the material linked in the decline message. S0091 (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:05:14, 17 February 2023 review of submission by Abhisheksuvarna17[edit]


Abhisheksuvarna17 (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC) need to publish my edit[reply]

See above. S0091 (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:43:47, 17 February 2023 review of submission by Lexybiederman[edit]


I am trying to inform the public about Scully & Scully, a luxury furniture store that has been on Park Ave in NYC since 1934. There is a lot of history behind the store and I want people to be able to read about it on Wikipedia when they Google it.

I have never written a wiki pg before so please let me know if there is anything I need to delete.

Lexybiederman (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was deleted because it was "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view" See WP:YFA for help with what is required. Theroadislong (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any article that begins with America's premier purveyor of fine home furnishings and gifts since 1934 is likely to be deleted as promotional. You'll need to find independent sources about Scully & Scully, and neutrally summarize what they're saying. The draft read like an ad brochure rather than an encyclopedia article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, understood thank you. Do you have any advice for how to change the verbiage to make it not sound promotional? Is there anyway I can contact you separately? Lexybiederman (talk) 20:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lexybiederman read ADVOCACY, WP:Manual of Style/Words to watch an WP:NPOV. Your stated purpose is contrary to Wikipedia's purpose which is likely why you are encountering these issues and unlikely able to see/resolve them. S0091 (talk) 21:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lexybiederman An article would need to be based on what others, unconnected with the store, have published about it, such as in newspapers or magazines. Please read your first article for more information. Thanks. David10244 (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:46:31, 17 February 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Rsimpson3490[edit]


Hello, I am requesting help with my wikipedia page. It is under review for no reason, I have done nothing wrong, besides upload carefully review and post information about myself that is useful to my fans. I am an artist named "Shy Stacks" my real name is Robert Shiloh Simpson. Everything I posted was truthful and true to my heart. It has taken me weeks to upload this page, so please help me reinstate. Thank you. Robert Shiloh "Shy Stacks" Simpson Rsimpson3490 18:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Robert Shiloh "Shy Stacks" Simpson Robert Shiloh "Shy Stacks" Simpson Rsimpson3490 18:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rsimpson3490 please see WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTPROMO Wikipedia is not your personal website. S0091 (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rsimpson3490 You asked the same thing very recently. Did you read the replies? You must be notable (click here) as Wikipedia defines it. Please also read your first article for some important information. These will help explain what the issues are with your draft. David10244 (talk) 09:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]