Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 August 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 26 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 27[edit]

00:39, 27 August 2023 review of submission by JNOJ1423[edit]

The preview is error I put a new picture on the page but preview noting so please edit please. JNOJ1423 (talk) 00:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for asking about drafts, you are asking about an existing article. You may do that at the more general Help Desk. 331dot (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

01:07, 27 August 2023 review of submission by JeffKramer651[edit]

This is an actor I've seen in multiple significant roles in TV productions I've watched, which is why I was curious as to why he did not have a wikipedia page (especially "I'm A Virgo") I found all of his work to be validated by IMDb and I cited Entertainment Weekly, The Los Angeles Times, and The Hollywood Reporter, which includes a photo of him. This was my first contribution and I'd like to continue to do so, but would like to make sure my work wasn't for nothing. Is there something I'm missing? I seem to find many entertainment professionals with far less media coverage and legitimate film and TV work that have pages. He also seems to be a cast member in the new Jennifer Lawrence movie, but I haven't seen that yet. JeffKramer651 (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your link. 331dot (talk) 01:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see other stuff exists. It could be that these other articles(the preferred term, not the broader "page") are also inappropriate and simply unaddressed yet, and you would be unaware of this. We can only address what we know about, this is why each draft or article is considered on its own merits. If you would like to help us, please identify other inappropriate articles you have seen for possible action. We need the help, as this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can.
As noted by the reviewer, the sources you have offered are not appropriate for establishing notability. 331dot (talk) 01:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please also note that IMDb is not a reliable source so doesn't help establish notability. Theroadislong (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:42, 27 August 2023 review of submission by Kgothikabi[edit]

Please assist with the clean up submission Kgothikabi (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have resubmitted it for a review. This isn't the place to request co-authors; if you want to see the draft published, you need to do the work. If you have questions about what work is needed, please ask. 331dot (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:36, 27 August 2023 review of submission by Patricia Mannerheim[edit]

Hi.Regarding the subject of this article, it is said in Iran that as of 2018, he is the last and only survivor of the battalion that he commanded in 1987 Operation Karbala-4, and secondary sources also confirm this claim. What makes me question is whether bringing such a fact to the content of the article, even though it has a source, is worthy of wikipedia and encyclopedia? —Patricia (Talk) 11:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:54, 27 August 2023 review of submission by Albughu[edit]

I AM NEW HERE, I WANT TO POST A ARTICLE , WHY NOT POSTED. Albughu (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't yell at us(use all capital letters). The reviewer left a reason for their rejection at the top of your draft. Do you have questions about this? 331dot (talk) 12:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Albughu. Your sandbox draft is redundant and unnecessary. We already have an article about Chandrayaan-3. We only have one article for each topic. Cullen328 (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:03, 27 August 2023 review of submission by Albughu[edit]

My article deleted. Albughu (talk) 13:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Albughu. Your article is not suitable for Wikipedia at this time. Only topics that meet the strict Wikipedia:Notability policy can have articles. Qcne (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:08, 27 August 2023 review of submission by Tahami86[edit]

Draft has been submitted multiple times but has been declined. It is about a person of a highest rank in medical domain of Pakistan Army and yet draft is being declined on reason that references do not show significant coverage. It is to mention that online coverage is not available due to organizational policies.

Please help me as I strongly recommend/ want to get this person's presence on Wikipedia. If you can please guide me, I am willing to remove any part of the content that will make the article published.

Thanks Tahami86 (talk) 18:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources do not need to be online, but this draft must summarize what independent reliable sources say about him. If no such sources exist, he would not merit a Wikipedia article despite his position. If you are associated with him, please read WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 18:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:15, 27 August 2023 review of submission by PainterManIvan[edit]

Hi, I will review the referencing guidelines and edit the article. However, I am unclear about the feedback about notability as an artist. What kind of evidence needs to be provided? Thanks PainterManIvan (talk) 18:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PainterManIvan.
To establish notability, you need to find reliable, independent, secondary sources that cover Ivan in detail, and then summarise them in your own words. That should make up the content of your article draft. Note that the sources must be:
- Reliable: Your article should rely on strong, reliable sources that are published by reputable institutions. Primary sources can be used for basic facts (such as a date of birth), but they should be supplemented with strong secondary sources that offer analysis or interpretation.
- Independent: Your sources should be independent of the subject, for example not self-published or from the subject's own website.
- Show significant coverage: Your subject should be discussed in detail in the sources you find. The sources should provide in-depth information or analysis about the subject, going beyond basic facts or promotional material.
- From multiple places: You should find at least three separate reliable, independent, secondary sources that discuss your subject.
- Not original research: Wikipedia articles should summarise existing knowledge about a subject, not present new research. This means you should avoid drawing your own conclusions or analyses from the sources. Stick to summarising what the sources say in a neutral tone.
If you cannot find multiple, reliable, and independent sources then I am afraid that Ivan would not meet the notability threshold at this time and therefore cannot have a Wikipedia article. Qcne (talk) 18:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PainterManIvan, vast swathes of your draft are currently unreferenced. Your draft needs a lot of work before being resubmitted. Cullen328 (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_August_27&oldid=1173374423"