Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 November 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 9 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 10[edit]

01:33:32, 10 November 2022 review of draft by Rickbenzel[edit]


Thanks for any help you can give. I have published a draft of an article about a noteworthy entrepreneur in southern California who has won many awards and deserves a Wikipedia page. I am a writer he hired to have me create his page. I have footnoted the appropriate content in his entry. I was trying to link some terms in the entry to existing Wikipedia pages, such as the mention in his entry to the EB-5 Program and the SBA 505 Program, both of which have existing Wiki entries. But I could not figure out how to do that. I have linked his companies to their external websites and that seems fine, but I wanted to show that he links to existing Wiki pages too. Can you show me how to do a link to an existing Wikipedia page?

Rickbenzel (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To link to another Wikipedia article(the preferred term for parts of the encyclopedia) or other page(like policy pages), place the title of the target page in double brackets. [[Joe Biden]] becomes Joe Biden. 331dot (talk) 01:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot figure out how to add the hyperlinks with the references to the associated News and media articles.

73.238.217.156 (talk) 02:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can refer to this page Wikipedia:Citation templates that show different styles and type of citations. ww2censor (talk) 10:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:15:45, 10 November 2022 review of submission by Saloniisachdeva[edit]

I am requesting a re-review because the details I have entered in my draft are valid as per my knowledge and the references. Also, I am unable to find the mistake due to which the draft is being rejected. Saloniisachdeva (talk) 11:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saloniisachedega The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. There is nothing that you can do about this, as no amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. 331dot (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:56:08, 10 November 2022 review of draft by AEIR22[edit]


AEIR22 (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your question, @AEIR22? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This draft as writ is advocacy rather than a neutrally-written encyclopaedia article. We don't accept manifestos. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 16:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:23:19, 10 November 2022 review of draft by Rnewenergy5[edit]


Hello support, thanks for reviewing this article. This should be the third change made to the article and it's still declined. I'd like you to be of assistance on how better I can write the article with the true events provided so it's worthy of approval.

I will be very grateful if my request is granted.

Thanks.Rnewenergy5 (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rnewenergy5 (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rnewenergy5: you need to write it in a neutral manner, avoiding spin and peacockery, such as the expressions 'pioneer', 'expansive', and 'spurring economic development'. While you're at it, you should also remove irrelevant content such as the list of board directors (I'm sure they would love to have their names included in a global encyclopaedia, but this is of no interest to us).
I also don't think, based on a quick glance, that the sources cited establish notability per WP:ORGCRIT, but I haven't analysed them in any detail. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:33, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello DoubleGrazing, your prompt reply is well noted and goes a long way. I will update the article as advised and resubmit it for review. Thanks once again. Rnewenergy5 (talk) 16:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:51:47, 10 November 2022 review of submission by Bfcc3456[edit]


Review for one more time

Bfcc3456 (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bfcc3456: this draft has been rejected and is in the process of being deleted, hence it won't be reviewed again. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bfcc3456 please declare your conflict of interest. You're on the precipice of being blocked for repeated, inappropriate creation Star Mississippi 18:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:05:05, 10 November 2022 review of submission by 2402:3A80:1C52:454F:3D6B:A4CA:5388:49CE[edit]


2402:3A80:1C52:454F:3D6B:A4CA:5388:49CE (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anything (1) Chowdhury controls or otherwise has influence over or (2) is about his company and not him is useless as a source for notability and for biographical claims. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]