Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 January 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 2 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 4 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 3[edit]

07:21:04, 3 January 2022 review of submission by MP180[edit]

Please man, its a 21st present for a mate and its an accurate and humourous depiction on his life up to this point MP180 (talk) 07:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MP180 Sorry, that's not what Wikipedia is for. There are other websites out there that are for such a purpose. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:48:35, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Bttdcbd[edit]


Bttdcbd (talk) 11:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bttdcbd, Wikipedia does not care what a subject has to say about themself. You must find and use independent secondary reliable sources.Slywriter (talk) 14:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:49:31, 3 January 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Kojo Shaddy[edit]


I realized my draft article has been deleted and I want to ask if I can retrieve it since it is now ready for editing.

Kindly help me retrieve it.

Thank you.

Kojo Shaddy (talk) 11:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kojo Shaddy: please ask at WP:REFUND/G13 to have the draft restored. Courtesy ping Liz Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kojo Shaddy (talkcontribs) 17:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:50:34, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Hansiwelangoda1994[edit]

i Rakitha is well known musician in srilanka and i thought of creating a page for him.he was the most youngest musician who entralled lot of young hearts.so please i appeal this page to be reconstructed Hansiwelangoda1994 (talk) 13:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:03:24, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Hansiwelangoda1994[edit]

please help me i need to publish this


Hansiwelangoda1994 (talk) 14:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hansiwelangoda1994, that will not be happening without reliable sources. No amount of editing can confer notability on a subject. Also, given your urgency, please see WP:COI and note that any relationship with subject of the article must be disclosed.Slywriter (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:30:33, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Ypoyq[edit]


I am confused why the article is being rejected Ypoyq (talk) 14:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ypoyq, The article will be deleted in the next few minutes as a cut and paste copyright violation. Please see WP:FIRSTARTICLE for tips, most importantly you must summarize the source in your own words.Slywriter (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:21:34, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Stefan Welebny[edit]


Hello,

my article about Bob Zabek has been rejected multiple times. I believe, there is something wrong with that. While I understand, that WikiPedia is a place for secondary, not primary research, I do not understand, why the other criteria regarding the quality of sources are applied so rigid.

I am a composer myself and - like crowds of other musicians - I acknowledge the musical quality and relevance of the guitarist Bob Zabek.

I hope somebody could review the article, who has a profound musical background, takes the time to study the references and links and does not stubborn stick to rules which lead to low quality decisions.

Kind regards

Stefan Welebny


Stefan Welebny (talk) 20:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Welebny Wikipedia has a strict policy about how living people are written about, see WP:BLP. Every statement about a living person must be sourced to an independent reliable source. Those sources must show that this composer meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable composer. Your draft was declined multiple times and then rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, because the sources offered were not appropriate. If you would like to tell the world about this person, you may want to try social media or a website with less stringent requirements. That, or wait for independent sources to write about him. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:31:00, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Penninx[edit]


Penninx (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created a page (Draft:List of Roman villas in the Netherlands) without specific references. All other pages (about 7) in the same category (Lists of Roman villas in other countries) also have no specific references. Why do i need more references then the other pages in the same Category?

Please read other stuff exists. Other poor articles existing does not mean that additional poor articles are permitted. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:44:32, 3 January 2022 review of submission by Araz Ali7[edit]


Araz Ali7 (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]