Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 12 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 14 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 13[edit]

07:11:25, 13 September 2021 review of submission by Nikhil mishra 49[edit]


Nikhil mishra 49 (talk) 07:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil mishra 49 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected. meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. You should also not post sensitive personal information about yourself on this worldwide public website, for your protection. 331dot (talk) 07:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:00:45, 13 September 2021 review of submission by THFC19[edit]

Hello there.

I'm looking for some help with this article to meet the notability guidelines.

Having now fully re-read the guidelines on Notability, I believe there are other specific sources available which will most likely corroborate the articles notability for inclusion in Wikipedia.

However, there now appears to be a STOP sign by the most recent comments and I can't see that I'm able to edit the submission any further? This may be my naivety in how these processes work.

Are you able to help?

Thanks kindly

THFC19 (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THFC19 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If you have new information that was not considered by the reviewer, you need to appeal to them directly. 331dot (talk) 13:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:27:34, 13 September 2021 review of submission by Alreadyoutspoken[edit]


asking for advice as some articles go into detail and the contribution is quote notable with the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999.

Alreadyoutspoken (talk) 12:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alreadyoutspoken The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If you have new information that was not considered by the reviewer, you need to appeal to them directly. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:53:28, 13 September 2021 review of submission by Drgasajid[edit]

I want to improve my article to meet the criteria of notability, so your answer will be very helpful for me. Drgasajid (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:RTEUrdu @Drgasajid: The sources you used to create the article do not show notability. Social media sites are poor sources. Without independent media coverage about the news site, the article will not be approved. You should read WP:RS and WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE TechnoTalk (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:54:51, 13 September 2021 review of draft by Katieschofield2000[edit]


I am trying to publish a Wikipedia page for Baturu Film Festival as an intern. However I am unable to do so did to insufficient referencing however all the information I received was from the festival directors itself and not a webpage so I am unsure how to reference this

Katieschofield2000 (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Katieschofield2000 As an intern, you must declare as a paid editor, even if you are not paid in cash money. See WP:PAID.
A Wikipedia article about an event must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the event, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable event. Any information from event organizers is not acceptable for establishing notability (that includes press releases or announcements). 331dot (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:35:37, 13 September 2021 review of submission by 71.105.3.237[edit]


What do I need to do, to get this page approved?

71.105.3.237 (talk) 14:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you can't do anything. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:20:00, 13 September 2021 review of draft by 190.28.229.3[edit]


190.28.229.3 (talk) 18:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article's sources do not show the significance of the subject. They appear to be all self-published. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:45, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:24:39, 13 September 2021 review of submission by 51.36.195.24[edit]


51.36.195.24 (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's no question here, and the Wikipedia community are not interested in people here to advertise. — Bilorv (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]