Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 March 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 3 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 4[edit]

Request on 09:16:47, 4 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Hitch2413[edit]


Hello, this is Hitch. I need assistance because in spite of editing out things from my article. It seems to get declined for some or other reason. The editors are cool. They did help me understand all the things I should be correcting but I seem to not do it in the right way. So, I need assistance in order to rectify my mistakes. I would be glad if you could help me.


Hitch2413 (talk) 09:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hitch2413, A great place to start is to have a conversation with the reviewers who pushed it back to you for further work Fiddle Faddle 22:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a editor, but it's ok. Maybe try making it more detailed and less spacious in listing?81.141.191.206 (talk) 09:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:29:38, 4 March 2021 review of submission by Pearly9031[edit]


Pearly9031 (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pearly9301 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:58:35, 4 March 2021 review of submission by GCKharian[edit]

Changes made as per Wikipedia guidelines. This new development should be put on Encyclopedia as it is a very good, visible housing project like Bahria town which so many independent sources are covering on their websites, some of which are put in references.

GCKharian (talk) 11:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GCKharian, You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:07:02, 4 March 2021 review of submission by Videos4world[edit]

Hi, I have improved my writeup and added reference. Please help me know if is worthy yet. I am worried it might be rejected forever :( Thank you. Link to my article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Grant_Proposal_Video#Grant_proposal_videos_are_videos_versions_of_written_proposals_used_by_nonprofits_to_raise_funds_for_their_projects. Videos4world (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Videos4world, your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:56:27, 4 March 2021 review of submission by Jaideep singh098[edit]


Jaideep singh098 (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaideep singh098, You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:29:24, 4 March 2021 review of submission by Buchererpianos.[edit]


THEN TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING ASSISTANCE BELOW THIS LINE. Take as many lines as you need.


Hello

I made this site for Jacksonville Theological Seminary. I wrote much more about it and then some people crossed things out. The website of www.jts.edu expalins you why it is important to have a Wikipeida website.

There are many aricles of students or professors who have taught there, like https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/myjournalcourier/obituary.aspx?n=kurt-william-huth&pid=158798789&fbclid=IwAR2oL9I_e7enezcEF_vhaz1IEzv4QtbODytWpioNid6iqELBSs-u6CUgvR4

These are the courses you can study there: http://www.jts.edu/web/catalogs/rmbc/pdf/rmbccatalog.pdf

I myself study there and have completed the 6th out of 10 courses.

Thank you.

Christof Bucherer, M.Div. (accredited by TRACS)

-->}}

Buchererpianos. (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Buchererpianos., I wish you well in your course. The things "someone crossed out" were copyright violations, something that must not be present. So they are no longer present.
Wikipedia does not care why the seminary may consider it important for an article to be here. It cares about simple notability and verifiability. Your job as the creating editor is to assert and verify that. The big pink decline box tells you what is required. Please confirm that you have read it. If you wish to resubmit the draft you must do the work. Please do not re-add the copyrighted material
Please be clear. JTS will never control the content of a Wikipedia article. It is not, absolutely not, a web site for jts. They have a web site. Please see WP:OWN Fiddle Faddle 22:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:22:46, 4 March 2021 review of submission by 2A00:23C7:5A9C:3F01:3089:880:82C7:A38C[edit]

OK, BUT IT’S STILL RELATIVELY POPULAR. 2A00:23C7:5A9C:3F01:3089:880:82C7:A38C (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not proceed further.
Relatively popular compared to what?
Even so, popularity is not notability Fiddle Faddle 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]