Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 March 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 23 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 24[edit]

04:40:18, 24 March 2021 review of submission by 2400:4050:A1A3:BD00:FC25:3109:A80B:4186[edit]


2400:4050:A1A3:BD00:FC25:3109:A80B:4186 (talk) 04:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't look remotely like an encyclopaedia article. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 05:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello IP, the draft has been rejected which means it will not be considered any further. –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 16:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:13:56, 24 March 2021 review of draft by Eric-Jan van Kakerken[edit]


March 15, I have asked reviewer Jenyire2 on her talkpage for instructions on what should be improved. I did not receive an answer yet. Could you help me out please? Eric-Jan van Kakerken (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eric-Jan van Kakerken, You will not get an answer. This user has been blocked indefinitely.
Your references are lacking. They are interviews with the principals, or passing mentions. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle Faddle 10:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:29:20, 24 March 2021 review of submission by 2405:201:6:A039:A550:DC95:5454:A982[edit]


If added a new Important Reference - Fox 34 (News Channel). 2405:201:6:A039:A550:DC95:5454:A982 (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you attributed all your sources to "Express Web Desk"? None of your sources are acceptable; they're either press releases (Digital Journal, Zee/Yahoo/LatestLy) or written/dictated by the subject (Fox 34, his own website, Medium). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 19:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:48:38, 24 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Indiadiamond[edit]


I need help to create a wiki page for my boss this wiki page is too complicated. is there someone that can help me do it?

Indiadiamond (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You asked this at the Teahouse, please only use one method of seeking assistance at a time. 331dot (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The short answer is no. There is a further response at the Teahouse where you asked the same question. Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Indiadiamond and welcome to the AfC help desk. Remember Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, your family, friends or company. If you are doing so, we may have conflict of interest. Wikipedia should be written from neutral point of view with information supported by reliable sources to verify the information. Unsourced information may be challenged and remove. If this is the first article you want to create, I'd suggest you to read WP:YFA, WP:REFB, WP:CITE and WP:NPOV. You should also see if the subject you are going to write about meets the notability policy. Anyway, happy editing! –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 16:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:16:55, 24 March 2021 review of submission by 2405:201:6:A039:1C8D:CC1E:B9F5:7489[edit]


Please accept this article now as More Notable References have been added. 2405:201:6:A039:1C8D:CC1E:B9F5:7489 (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:25:50, 24 March 2021 review of submission by 197.29.191.63[edit]


197.29.191.63 (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to suggest they come anywhere near close to passing the notability guidelines.The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not only has it been rejected, the photograhs are of doubtful provenance on Commons and are nominated for deletion there Fiddle Faddle 17:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:47:51, 24 March 2021 review of submission by 2405:201:6:A039:1C8D:CC1E:B9F5:7489[edit]

Added Notable References. 2405:201:6:A039:1C8D:CC1E:B9F5:7489 (talk) 19:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Fiddle Faddle 20:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:50:46, 24 March 2021 review of submission by Barbarajrea76[edit]


Hello. I am a first time Wikipedia poster and my submission was rejected for the following reason:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

I am not sure which part was in question as I tried to have neutral voice and sourced many independent published articles to verify. I would like to edit and re-submit but I am unclear which portion of my post was problematic per their policy. Thank you so much for the guidance.

Barbarajrea76 (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barbarajrea76, No, it was declined. Rejection is final. Being declined is iterative.
I note your correct declaration on your user page of being paid to create this draft. Please deploy {{connected contributor (paid)}} on the draft's talk page.
The thing about being paid while you write stuff here is the incongruity of asking volunteers to help you to earn your pay. Doesn't seem that fair, does it? Fiddle Faddle 20:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:56:55, 24 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Jsolomon7[edit]


Jsolomon7 (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. --Finngall talk 22:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_March_24&oldid=1014982505"