Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 29 << May | June | Jul >> July 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 30[edit]

00:35:13, 30 June 2021 review of draft by Uzik01[edit]


Good afternoon,

After 4 months in review the article I've created on Adolf Shapiro (theatre director) was declined by the user Scorpions13256 citing minimum standard for inline citations.

Unfortunately the user Scorpions13256 is unavailable for any comment, user talk page is down for mental health issues.

The article does not contain direct quotations, no challenged statements or statements tagged with "citation needed", no statement that is likely to be challenged, and no contentious material.

The article also contains 18 inline citations.

Furthermore, the article is a translation of the article within Russian language wikipedia which apparently does meet citation standards. Except where Russian language article has 12 inline citation here we expanded the list to 18.

Perhaps the problem is with citation format, or some specific statement is causing the article to be declined, but since the reviewer is unavailable for comment I have no choice but to request help here.

Thank you in advance.

Uzik01 (talk) 00:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

01:09:47, 30 June 2021 review of draft by 76.66.120.12[edit]


I am the original creator of this draft but I was told it was not referenced properly. But I was not told which lines are missing citations so I can add them. They are all from an official University website so if needed I can cite every single line (but that seems excessive to me).

76.66.120.12 (talk) 01:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One source is nowhere near enough to justify an article, let alone a source associated with the subject. You need to come up with strong third-party sources. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:54:12, 30 June 2021 review of submission by Sapodefirst[edit]

This is a media outlet for one of the most valuable utility tokens in Africa. Sapodefirst (talk) 04:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. An organization only merits an article if it receives significant coverage in independent reliable sources, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization; your draft does not do that and the reviewer rejected it because they see little chance that it can. 331dot (talk) 07:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:50:26, 30 June 2021 review of submission by 2401:4900:3149:4846:A405:AA12:5548:903C[edit]


2401:4900:3149:4846:A405:AA12:5548:903C (talk) 07:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:57:12, 30 June 2021 review of draft by AlicjankaC[edit]


I would like to speed up my draft review, and add a category to my draft:Małgorzata Cybulska. It is about Tokyo Summer Olympics 2020, women equestrian/ eventing athletes. Unfortunately, the category I see is "german scientists" and don't know how to change it. I would like to add this tag about Tokyo since my draft is about one of the nominated athletes for Tokyo that did not have her article yet, so publishing this article should be fast.

Best

AlicjankaC (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That draft would never be accepted because it is not in English. Please write it on the appropriate Wikipedia for that language. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:36:59, 30 June 2021 review of submission by TheUniversalRapMusician[edit]


TheUniversalRapMusician (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft contains no reliable sources and contains zero indication of notability. --Kinu t/c 16:12, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:03:04, 30 June 2021 review of submission by Hrishikesh Namboothiri V[edit]

I don't know why you're saying that the article have no reliable sources. You can search in google for the topic 'Traditional Malayalam months'. Is Google a reliable source? Yours sincerely, Hrishikesh Namboothiri V

Hrishikesh Namboothiri V (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, Google Searches aren't a reliable source, because 1) there is no real control and 2) it is highely dynamic: What might appear now on the first results page, might be gone in an hour. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This draft is redundant to the article Malayalam calendar, which is sourced more adequately. --Kinu t/c 18:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then there are some books on the topic'Traditional Malayalam months'.

18:08:01, 30 June 2021 review of submission by 76.240.112.154[edit]


76.240.112.154 (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Refer to this:
In summarry, your sources are all useless. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:04:26, 30 June 2021 review of submission by 137.103.251.12[edit]


Hello this is a new startup i've been following as i met the CEO at tech conference event, I truly believe this will be the next big tech company, how can we help by getting this page up?

137.103.251.12 (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Four of your sources are 404-compliant and the other two are press releases, which are primary sources and cannot help for notability as Wikipedia defines it. We do not have articles about "the next big thing"; they must have already made a name for themselves for us to even consider having an article. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:40:17, 30 June 2021 review of submission by TheoryReader[edit]


TheoryReader (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. In order to satisfy WP:Notability, we need multiple reliable third-party sources that discuss the book at length, which for books generally means professional or scholarly reviews. One single review is not going to cut it. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I looked online and while there are some reviews, the sources are borderline notable so would agree this wouldn't be notable regardless of any additional sources being added. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:08:02, 30 June 2021 review of submission by Morris Bannerman[edit]


Morris Bannerman (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add an article to wiki and link to the composer involved with the article - Morris Bannerman (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: User:Morris Bannerman/sandbox
We need to see more sources that discuss them at length. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_June_30&oldid=1032192556"