Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 3
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 2 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 4 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 3[edit]
- Happybusan (talk · contribs)
Happybusan (talk) 16:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Happybusan, The draft must be supported by inline citations consisting of reliable and non-primary sources. Curbon7 (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
17:51:39, 3 July 2021 review of submission by Urju 23[edit]
If you search for "Urjumelashvili" in the search box for the page it shows the information. I don't know how to get a link that already has the surname written in the search box. What do I do? I saw another family Wikipedia article, Glonti (also a Georgian surname) and in it, they use the same site for a source in the reference list, and when you click the link there it takes you to the same site but it just says 404 გვერდი არ მოიძებნა (meaning: page not found) I don't get how that was approved if this isn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:How_geogen_looks_.png#/media/File:How_geogen_looks_.png - in which books the surname appears
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:How_geogen_looks_2.png#/media/File:How_geogen_looks_2.png - from which cities it originates
I'd be very thankful if you could help me out :)
Urju 23 (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Urju 23 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Not every family name merits a Wikipedia article; it depends on significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
19:45:28, 3 July 2021 review of draft by Forich[edit]
I recently created the draft Draft:Ramses Ramos and submitted it for review as a new article. It received this review on July 2 2021:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
. The reviewer was User: Yeeno. I have introduced half a dozen new sources to the same draft, most of them pertaining to websites of the main TV networks in Colombia (Caracol Television and RCN Television), and others from important local news outlets (i.e. El Tiempo (Colombia)). Please review whether the inclusion of these new sources is enough to address the defficiencies pointed out by Yeeno in his review. Pinging @Yeeno: to see if he can comment here as well.
Forich (talk) 19:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Forich, The article was certainly improved with your addition of reliable sources. The only ask I have is that you remove the IMDb reference, as IMDb is not an acceptable reference. I think it's much better than when it was declined, and you are always welcome to resubmit the draft, but it is up to the next reviewer to determine whether it passes either our notability criteria for actors or our general notability criteria. Curbon7 (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)