Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 August 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 3 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 4[edit]

07:18:17, 4 August 2021 review of submission by Michalafeka[edit]

I summitted an article that was declined in may. After communications with the reviewer I made the requested changes and resubmitted - at least I think I did. I cannot find any confirmation of the resubmission and have not received any messages.

Michalafeka (talk) 07:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michalafeka If you are referring to the draft I have placed a link to above, you need to click "Resubmit" to actually resubmit it for review. 331dot (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok. I thought I did that but I guess I did something wrong. Can you confirm that it has not beeen submitted for re-review?

Michalafeka Yes, it is now submitted. 331dot (talk) 07:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:21:57, 4 August 2021 review of submission by Malek Dager124[edit]


Malek Dager124 (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malek Dager124, you didn’t ask a question but your submission was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:40:51, 4 August 2021 review of draft by Rakib ul 321[edit]


Rakib ul 321 (talk) 10:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rakib ul 321 You don't ask a question. You have submitted your draft for review, but it will almost certainly be rejected as you admit there is no information out there. A subject must receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:50:07, 4 August 2021 review of submission by Kanikatutoreye1[edit]


I have edited the draft to just state factual information about Vedatya Institute and have provided references for the same.

Kanikatutoreye1 (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission was rejected as it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. It is basically a short advertisement for the subject company. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:49:27, 4 August 2021 review of submission by Kieran375[edit]

Ask for advice please Kieran375 (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kieran375, Your submission was rejected, meaning it cannot be resubmitted. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your submission was rejected due to a lack of reliable sources. IDMB is not a reliable source. Also a lack of WP:SIGCOV in sources also is an issue. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:14:10, 4 August 2021 review of submission by Menu maharaj[edit]


Menu maharaj (talk) 17:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did not ask a question, but the draft has been rejected, which means that it should not be submitted again. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. --bonadea contributions talk 17:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]