Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 June 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 28 << May | June | Jul >> June 30 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 29[edit]

04:38:31, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Lohenge[edit]


Lohenge (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC) How can I improve this article? I know that the content of an article needs to be supported by effective references. My objective is to put in writing the information regarding Mooto village. The difficulty is to get books, articles or other written materials to support what I know about this village. Can you assist me to make my article effective. Thanks[reply]

@Lohenge: assuming this is about User:Lohenge/Hilaire Mambe Engobo, it was deleted 4 years and 6 months ago because it hasnt been edited in a while. If you wish to retieve it, ask at WP:REFUND/G13. 217.68.167.73 (talk) 08:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:26:28, 29 June 2020 review of submission by 102.89.2.212[edit]

There is a recent independent report about the group 102.89.2.212 (talk) 06:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning it will not be considered further. You will need more than one independent reliable source. A Wikipedia article should only summarize what independent reliable sources state about a subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability, in this case, the definition of a notable organization. As noted by the reviewer, you had no independent reliable sources to support content in the draft. Interviews with staff or spokespeople for the organization do not count. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:07:33, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Dinesh Singh (DOP)[edit]

I don't know what is the reason for not publishing the article which I've submitted a couple of hours ago. Dinesh Singh (DOP) (talk) 08:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dinesh Singh (DOP) You have no independent reliable sources to support the content of the article. This is especially vital for any biography of a living person. Please read Your First Article. If you are attempting to write about yourself, please read the autobiography policy as to why that is strongly discouraged. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:19:31, 29 June 2020 review of draft by 73.162.180.160[edit]


Hello, what additional information would be required to get this page approved? I see that the wiki article for Yale Literary Magazine has a similar amount of information and article length—with less citations—and it is already a published page. What makes that listing more legitimate? Thanks so much.

73.162.180.160 (talk) 08:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:24:40, 29 June 2020 review of submission by 80.193.62.107[edit]


Hello,

Thank you for reviewing this article. I am Amy and I occasionally do voluntary work for Mr Newman. I am the person who wrote this article. After following the guidelines your predecessors gave me, submitting as many links to my sources as possible (and omitting the ones I could not trace back), after including the information (as per your predecessor's guidance) that I was doing this article for Mr Newman, this article has been rejected again, this time for a reason I cannot comprehend.

Please advise as I'm willing to make the necessary changes once again... and add that Mr Newman has recently been a guest on BBC's Your Money And Your Life as well as BBC Radio Ulster as a retail expert, should his notoriety still be unclear.

Kind regards,

Amy

80.193.62.107 (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the draft has been rejected, not just declined, meaning that in the opinion of the reviewer there is little to no chance it can be sufficiently improved enough to meet standards. Please review the comments left by the reviewers. Any article about a person should not just tell what they have done; it should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Significant coverage goes beyond brief mentions or mere announcements of things the person does. It usually has in depth analysis and fact checking. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:56:21, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Gaurav8D pixer[edit]

Please tell what i do Gaurav8D pixer (talk) 08:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav8D pixer Wikipedia is not a place to tell the world about yourself, especially if the information is not accurate. Please read the autobiography policy as to why writing about yourself is not advisable. If you just want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:44:48, 29 June 2020 review of submission by 212.159.72.195[edit]


Would it be more acceptable to post references to online metadata records about this service - like this: https://www.spatialdata.gov.scot/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/8212ae76-9f58-4e3e-b486-2d6e930e30f6

How about another case study about the project: https://www.agi.org.uk/news/case-studies/1459-spatial-hub-turning-local-government-data-into-self-sustaining-assets

I'm at a loss to propose anything else that can prove this is a justifiable project for inclusion to wikipedia!

212.159.72.195 (talk) 10:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


10:49:45, 29 June 2020 review of submission by PyWiXard[edit]

Hi!! I've written an article for Dhhyey Desai - this page is full of results from him, please tell me what other details are needed, there is a lot online as he is an influencer, please let me know what others are needed, thank you very much. PyWiXard (talk) 10:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


10:58:07, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Malachand[edit]


THEN TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING ASSISTANCE BELOW THIS LINE. Take as many lines as you need. -->}}

Malachand (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC) LankaPropertyWeb[reply]

Hi this is my first time writing an article on Wikipedia. The reason I chose to write about this company is that I recently came across their posts on social media that said they were hosting Sri Lanka's first virtual real estate show. I looked back on their history through the company page to get an idea about it and collected my information from there. However, since it is not allowed to write on wiki without citing I also included third party news sources that contain information on the company to support my work. But it was taken down. Can I know what exactly I need to correct for it to be approved?

11:04, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Akiva100[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Akiva100/sandbox

I would like to know if I formatted this article correctly for publication on Wikipedia. Thank you to all the editors who have assisted.

Akiva100 (talk) 11:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akiva100 (talk) 11:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Akiva100:, since your message suggests it wasn't just a test edit but intended to progress, I've done some basic clearance work. However, I'd take a look at the Saul Berlin article you've linked to. You either need to have significantly more content (with more references) on the work, or you'd be better off putting in a dedicated section in Saul's article rather than create a new article. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:14:08, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Malachand[edit]


Hello, This is my first time writing an article on Wikipedia. I chose to write about this company because I saw their posts on social media that they were hosting Sri Lanka's first virtual real estate show. I found information about the company through their website and created the article. however since wiki's policies don't allow an article to be written without crediting I made sure that I cited third party news sources in Sri Lanka that contained information about the company. But it was taken down.

Can I know what exactly should I change in this article for it to be accepted? I really want to have my first article published on wiki. -->}}

Malachand (talk) 11:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Malachand (talk) 11:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:53:16, 29 June 2020 review of draft by Arganflu[edit]


Hi - I put up this page on George Cazenove months ago and it is still waiting for review. A couple of changes have been suggested and I have actioned them. I am not a very experienced Editor on Wiki, so would hugely appreciate some help on getting this page live. In 2016 I did this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzannah_Harvey and it was up almost straight away...

Many many thanks Arganflu (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suzannah Harvey is actually very poorly sourced, I'm surprised that it was ever accepted. Your current draft still has inappropriate external links as I mentioned on my talk page, [1] [2] [3], [4], [5]. Theroadislong (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:07:18, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Laura at vjoon-gmbh[edit]


Hi out there, my article got rejected and I would like to ask for some advice on how to get the article online with further adjustments? I have added some more relevant customers of the company and changed the wording here and there, not sure if that will do? The software is of highest relevance for a lot of customers and especially the connection to Adobe and cloud providers such as Amazon Cloud Services shows the significance of the software. I would appreciate any tips you might have that could help me to provide and add relevant information for the article to be shifted to the Wikipedia main site. Thank you very much and best regards, Laura at vjoon-gmbh (talk) 14:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:25:17, 29 June 2020 review of draft by Arganflu[edit]


Hello - I have had some help with trying to get this page to a point when it can go live. I have made the changes suggested. Can anyone else help me to get this page published please? I am not an experienced Editor, so all help is gratefully received. This has been in draft awaiting review now since early May and I am keen to get it signed off and live. Many thanks!

Arganflu (talk) 14:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:44:09, 29 June 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Topy Lozano[edit]


Hi. This is my first time to create a Wikipedia page. Published articles to support the article came from a copy of newspapers/magazines in the 1950's and 1960's that are no longer in business. Some came from research articles online that also confirms claims in the published articles. Its about the life of Alfredo A. Lozano who influenced Philippine music culture back during the American regime and in the Japanese occupation and got awarded by two Presidents for his efforts. Any suggestions on how it may be improved or necessary changes needed in order to be granted publication at Wikipedia is appreciated. Would also be happy to delete statements or passing mentions to meet Wikipedia standards. Thank you. Topy

Topy Lozano (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Topy Lozano: Wikipedia requires multiple reliable independent sources with significant coverage. Wikipedia isnt considered reliable. The subject's own homepage fails the independent part. blogspot.com and wordpress.com are neither considered reliable. 217.68.167.73 (talk) 05:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:22:02, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Siriandstuffs[edit]


Siriandstuffs (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


16:54:10, 29 June 2020 review of draft by Nantucket60[edit]


My submission "the Hamilton Mathematics Institute TCD" was reviewed on June 7 and rejected. Since then I substantially updated the submission which now demonstrates that this is the renowned mathematics institution in Ireland, in Irelands oldest and prestigious university, which was founded by arguably some of the most distinguished and famous mathematicians of 20th century and that this institute plays major role in world's mathematics community as exemplified by awards and support it receives. Unfortunately my edits have not been yet reviewed so I am hesitant to make more updates until I see the response from Wikipedia in regard to my previous updates. Please advise what shall I bee doing in order to make sure this page finally is published. Sincerely, Nantucket60

Nantucket60 (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nantucket60: WP:GNG requires significant coverage (My interpretation is at least 1 lengthy paragraph) in multiple independent, reliable sources. Out of the 8 sources, 4 are from the college itself (definitely not independent). Out of the other 4, at least 3 appear to not have significant coverage. Due to this, I don't think the article would be accepted. I'd recommend trying to find more independent sources about this institute, or redirect to the college article. Username6892 19:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC) I'm not an actual reviewer, but if I saw this as a new article, I would probably PROD or redirect if I didn't find any additional sources.[reply]

17:45:18, 29 June 2020 review of submission by Siriandstuffs[edit]


This page is dedicated to Indian model and TV personality Asim Riaz who rose to immense popularity after participating in Bigg Boss 13. After the show Asim has worked as a model in quite a number of music video which allows him to be notable.The article Asim Riaz was deleted and protected on 16th February 2020. I request to be provided with the Administrator Access to edit further.

Siriandstuffs (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siriandstuffs, the article was protected after repeated attempts to recreate the article after it was deleted. Your best option is to continue to work on the existing draft article and improve it to where it will meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Read the WP:NACTOR page for what's needed. Appearing in a reality show and some music videos do not meet the notability requirements. The reviewer comments on the draft article also give you some useful advice. Ravensfire (talk) 19:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]