Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 June 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 23 << May | June | Jul >> June 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 24[edit]

01:53:53, 24 June 2020 review of draft by Professor25B[edit]


Ignore this -- think I figured it out. Thanks.

Professor25B (talk) 01:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

03:15:06, 24 June 2020 review of submission by Mohamed Omar 3[edit]


Mohamed Omar 3 (talk) 03:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Presumably you have a question for us? Fiddle Faddle 13:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. I think you need to specify why a draft that has been flagged as rejected should be re-assessed. Fiddle Faddle 22:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  • Thank you Timtrent. Draft Meets the standards، And she has enough sources. Draft rejected before adding sources to it.
tour guide and actor in Egypt , Trusted sources , and have Fame And sources more than Ali Mansur for example. --Mohamed Omar 3 (talk) 22:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have left a helpful comment on the draft itself, with advice to look very carefully at your referencing and to make a direct approach to the declining reviewer. Fiddle Faddle 07:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Mohamed Omar 3: The final element is to ask the editor who declined the draft for comments. Ask them on their talk page. The link is in the notice where they declined it.
Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles. Fiddle Faddle 07:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Timtrent , Thank you very much, and i have asked them to re-review on their talk page. Thank you for helping. and Thank you for your time. We want to accept articles. --Mohamed Omar 3 (talk) 07:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

03:22:51, 24 June 2020 review of submission by DarkHeartedKill[edit]

ignore this — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkHeartedKill (talkcontribs) [Refering to a question they deleted] --Worldbruce (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:49:06, 24 June 2020 review of draft by Giorgi.cheminava[edit]


Hello,

Thank you very much for reviewing the draft, I am General manager of the brand DALOOD. We want very much to publish our brand history on wikipedia, all the information we uploaded are our own and we have all the copyrights for it, please let me know how should we proceed? Your help will be very much appreciated, Giorgi

Giorgi.cheminava (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgi.cheminava Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves or what they consider to be their own history. Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about your company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Articles are typically written by independent editors. If you just want to tell the world about the history of your brand, you should use social media or a website owned by your company. Regarding copyright, you cannot just post copyrighted text here, it must be properly donated. But again, we aren't interested in what any company says about itself.
If you are the general manager, you are required by the Wikipedia Terms of Use to review and formally comply with the paid editing policy and declare that. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:16:01, 24 June 2020 review of draft by ConwayDigi[edit]


Hello! I am helping a contributor to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_ConwayLibrary to create their very first article! We seem to have become a little stuck, as the first attempt included information that the creator didn't realise needed to be rephrased in order to avoid copyright concerns.

The OP, Bewilderedgreatspot, has edited the article now so no copyright infringement should remain.

The first reviewer has helpfully taken another look and said 'The CV investigation is still in process and when completed all revisions which contained CVs will need to be removed from the page history so they are no longer visible. This is a process known as WP:REVDEL.'. I'm not sure how to conduct REVDEL. Would someone be able to help? Thanks! ConwayDigi (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ConwayDigi (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ConwayDigi You cannot conduct revision deletions yourself, only administrators can. However, as all the content seemed to be a violation, the entire draft had to be deleted, you and/or the other user will need to start fresh using Articles for Creation to create a new draft. Please see your user talk page if you haven't already. 331dot (talk) 11:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
331dot Thanks very much for clarifying! Will let Bewilderedgreatspot know.ConwayDigi (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:04:13, 24 June 2020 review of submission by Danny543210[edit]


Danny543210 (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Danny543210: Your draft has been rejected and is unlikely to make any further progress. You have come here to ask for advice, but we need a question, please. Fiddle Faddle 13:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:25:26, 24 June 2020 review of submission by 197.48.98.129[edit]


edit with more sorce and info..


197.48.98.129 (talk) 13:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:35:12, 24 June 2020 review of submission by Yogesh Ishant Sharma[edit]

This is not for just publicity but its my struggle to get education in difficult situation.I have to travel long distance to reach the school more than 10 kilometres in a day. This is just short composition further details will be given soon.please make my Wikipedia page.Ita a humble request.I hope you will understand my emotions.

Yogesh Ishant Sharma (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yogesh Ishant Sharma, Your draft completely fails in WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Remember, Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST. Please refrain from creating self - WP:PROMOTIONAL drafts and articles in Wikipedia. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot: Courtesy ping for further opinions if any as he/she was involved in advising previous request Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#15:47:28, 23 June 2020 review of submission by Yogesh Ishant Sharma ~ Amkgp 💬 14:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yogesh Ishant Sharma, you seem to be treating Wikipedia as social media; Wikipedia is not social media. We have no interest in what people want to say about themselves. This is an encyclopedia, and as an encyclopedia Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources like the news say about people that are shown to meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. If you just want to tell the world about yourself and what you do, you should use social media like Facebook or some other alternative forum where that is permitted. 331dot (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:21:59, 24 June 2020 review of submission by Mr.Conan 123[edit]


Mr.Conan 123 (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave wikipedia man, can you tell me the best way to delete my account?

Mr.Conan 123 Accounts cannot be deleted, for both technical and legal reasons, if you no longer wish to participate here, just abandon your account. 331dot (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:03:54, 24 June 2020 review of submission by Turquoisecacke[edit]

Greetings! I'm wondered how fast my article has been checked, that's great! Big thanks to I dream of horses :)! I didn't merged this article to Polytechnic University of Turin, cause despite of it could seem that this university is a branch of Polytechnic University of Turin, it has its own researches and contributios in different spheres of life. As I understood, It's needed more information about researches, scientific contribution etc. to exist as a standalone article. Please, tell me am I right? I'm gonna continue working on this article, but only if the possibility of the exisitacne of this article as a standalone is real, otherwise I follow the suggestion and merge this article to existing about Polytechnic University of Turin. Moreover one more request, could u suggest what kind of information also could be useful for this kind of article, plesase. Thanks for attention and future replies!

With regards, Turquoisecacke (talk) 22:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Turquoisecacke. With a bit more work you'll probably be able to justify this as a stand alone article. Wikipedia:College and university article guideline contains advice about what to include and what to avoid. For a university like this one, the history section will be the most important. Independent sources likely exist that cover the decision to found it, the construction of the campus, the start of the first classes, and any major changes to its academic offerings as it ramped up. The only sources of information for some of the other sections will be the university itself, and non-independent sources are less helpful in showing that it should be a stand alone article. Don't rely too heavily on non-independent sources, or the independent ones won't stand out. Study some featured articles about universities as practical examples. Ideally you'd be able to write something about research, but it is not required and needn't be a large part of the article. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]