Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 December 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 24 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 26 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 25[edit]

03:32:32, 25 December 2020 review of draft by Mmmm1362[edit]


Could you publish my article on this Christmas day?

Mmmm1362 (talk) 03:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:05:16, 25 December 2020 review of submission by 103.105.236.121[edit]


103.105.236.121 (talk) 05:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


06:09:17, 25 December 2020 review of draft by Diamond qwerty[edit]


Its almost more than 1 month. I am trying to publish this draft but unable to do this. Please help me what can i do to publish this draft. I think there is some misunderstanding form your end, I am not a paid editor. I am very much inspired with this person so i like to publish it. Please help me out from this. Diamond qwerty (talk) 06:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond qwerty (talk) 06:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:25:19, 25 December 2020 review of draft by Mmmm1362[edit]


Can anyone complete the infobox of my article?

Mmmm1362 (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:04:42, 25 December 2020 review of submission by Edgaras1458[edit]


Edgaras1458 (talk) 13:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:45:26, 25 December 2020 review of submission by Rajaneesh.R.Nayak[edit]


Rajaneesh.R.Nayak (talk) 14:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Rajaneesh.R.Nayak: You didn't ask a question. This submission is unverified. Wikipedia is not a source for WIkipedia. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:09:18, 25 December 2020 review of draft by Balwinderbatra7[edit]


See the above page. It has enough cites, sources and I have no direct or indirect relation with Onkar. I live in Jammu, where he resides and I am writing about him because he deserves to be in Wikipedia. The article is not an advertisement from any end. It's totally neutral and I have used sources not the own created source of the subject. The news sources I used are totally neutral.

Balwinderbatra7 (talk) 17:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:17:48, 25 December 2020 review of submission by MercuryRising451[edit]


absurd assertion... there is no arricle on triggo at all in English. I am trying to add one. why are you concoting such an absurd notion? thsi is not an advert. just basic informantion 10% of what already exists on the PL wikipedia. if you think it is an advert, go ahead and write a translation from wikipedia pl

MercuryRising451 (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


we are trying to create an direct ENGLISH transation of article from Polish wikipedia on triggo. We just started and a user acting in a pathological fashion User:Theroadislong is blocking those attampts for no valid reason. the article is intended to be a DIRECT TRANSALTION of an existing article in PL wikipedia. And that user is blocking it and hurling insane accusations of it being and ad.... not only that this person is not creating an article that is missing but that person is actively blocking an article to match the one in PL wikipedia and that exist for other vehicles of the sort.

MercuryRising451 (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MercuryRising451: In order for an article to pass the Articles for Creation process at the English Wikipedia, you have to demonstrate that the subject meets one of our notability guidelines. In this case, the General Notability Guideline states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" means that it has received in-depth coverage, i.e. not passing mentions. "Reliable sources" means sources that meet our reliable sourcing guidelines, which generally speaking means things like major newspapers, major magazines, books published by major publishers, etc. "Independent of the subject" means that the subject, or companies related to the subject, or people who are related to the subject, do not do anything to establish notability. So an article about a vehicle, where the only reference is to the vehicle's corporate website, does nothing to establish notability.
Unfortunately, just because there is an article at the Polish Wikipedia doesn't mean that an article is guaranteed at the English Wikipedia. Each community has its own rules. Sorry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


one of the users that initially contested it alrady provided links to major newspapers warranting inclusion — Preceding unsigned comment added by MercuryRising451 (talkcontribs) 23:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean the article is ready for live space. If you want to move the article forward, you'll need to figure out where those references go, and address the issues raised of the article sounding like an advertisement. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:45, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:56:40, 25 December 2020 review of draft by Silvia Dalle Montagne[edit]


This is my first contribution, I'm just trying to learn. I see you are suggesting to tweak the content so that it sounds less a resume but I wonder where I should focus, if in the description of the person as a musician or cutting out the less relevant information. I just don't want to risk to cut too much and be less complete. Many thanks

Silvia Dalle Montagne (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]