Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 August 11
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 10 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 12 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 11[edit]
04:08:36, 11 August 2020 review of submission by Markkaempfer[edit]
- Markkaempfer (talk · contribs)
Markkaempfer (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Markkaempfer, Does the church have a historical designation? For example, buildings on the National Register of Historic Places are automatically notable, but other buildings need to meet a higher standard. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The church may not be as historically important as churches located in large, major cities, but I think it is still noteworthy, and I would argue that articles representing rural areas need cultivating on Wikipedia as much as urban areas.
07:51:25, 11 August 2020 review of submission by Sanjaysharma5882[edit]
Hi, I edited the page Draft:Zeeshan_Khan one month ago, but the page is still pending for review. I just want to know if there is any problem in this draft why it has not reviewed still.
Sanjaysharma5882 (talk) 07:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm afraid your draft is not pending review it was rejected last October and will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 07:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sanjaysharma5882, You failed to submit it. It was rejected a long while ago. I have not looked at what you have done. If you are sure that the referencing meets our needs please press the submit button
- For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle Faddle 07:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
08:18:19, 11 August 2020 review of draft by JKMFraser[edit]
can you remind me how to add text below a photo in Wikipedia ? thank you so much
jennifer
JKMFraser (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- @JKMFraser: I believe Help:Pictures#Thumbnails should have what you are looking for. JTP (talk • contribs) 08:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
08:36:24, 11 August 2020 review of submission by Pipsta[edit]
Pipsta (talk) 08:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pipsta You don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It appears that the person you wrote about does not meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
How do I submit an article for review? Thanks. I think I may have posted this a few times so my apologies Pipsta (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you have additional comment, please edit this existing thread, instead of creating additional threads. Just click "edit" near the section header. As noted, you can't submit it again. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
10:35:59, 11 August 2020 review of submission by RIYA ADVANI[edit]
- RIYA ADVANI (talk · contribs)
RIYA ADVANI (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
plz help me in article creation
- @RIYA ADVANI: I have detected the following problems:
- This submission lacks reliable sources that are independent of the subject and have some coverage of the subject. It therefore currently fails WP:NCORP.
- Google Searches arent considered reliable because they are highely dynamic, and in most cases they arent with significant coverage either
- The subject's social media pages (Facebook, YouTube, Linkedin, Twitter, Instagram arent considered reliable because they are user-generated content and self-published. they arent independent of the subject either.
- The submission contains pufferey respectively "marketing-speech".
- Wikipedia articles usally dont include the full contact information. If any folks out there are interested, they can look it up. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
18:40:09, 11 August 2020 review of submission by Heathervale[edit]
- Heathervale (talk · contribs)
Hi, it says it reads like an ad and isn't neutral enough ... but I was very careful to make it totally neutral and not put anything that didn't have available citations.
Also, why is it not OK for the topic to be mentioned in the articles but not have the articles completely about the topic? Most journalists like to include 2 or 3 examples at least. Heathervale (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Heathervale, please concentrate on making the changes the reviewer has pointed out to you. We coudl discuss angels dancing in a pin fir a long time. Crypto currency article are viewed with special care here to make sure they comply in all respects with our policies. The onus is on the creating editor to make that so. Fiddle Faddle 09:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- InfoGautam (talk · contribs)
Atul kumar gautam satna amarpatan Satna
InfoGautam (talk) 19:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- There's no indication your topic meets notability standards. Please note that this is an encyclopedia, not a social-networking site. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)