Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 April 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 24 << Mar | April | May >> April 26 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 25[edit]

11:29:46, 25 April 2020 review of submission by 2A00:23C7:3706:4500:17A:481B:5C22:8EAB[edit]

Hi, could you please tell me what the issue is with the Olivier Varenne page? 2A00:23C7:3706:4500:17A:481B:5C22:8EAB (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is(as the reviewers have said) that Varenne does not seem to meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. No amount of editing can confer notability, it depends on the sources. Much of the draft seems to be about the exhibits at his museum and not him personally. If there are independent sources that have chosen to give Varenne significant coverage, please offer them. You may also want to read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:46:28, 25 April 2020 review of submission by Glammazon[edit]


Glammazon (talk) 11:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because l corrected the links after reading the last notice. The one for Comics Plus leads to an error message on that site, so from there you go to Comics, then you scroll down to M.L.J., then from there go to Zip Comics. You can also type "Zip 10" into the search engine and get there faster. Inferno has always had a special place in my heart, because he's the only one of the Mighty Crusaders to have been a villain.Glammazon (talk) 11:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glammazon All sources are still 404 error pages. No other improvements have been made. Topic is not notable. Theroadislong (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Glammazon (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC) i went back to Comics Plus and found Zip Comics 10 at "Archie/MLJ." Sorry for any inconvenience.Glammazon (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Glammazon (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, ojak,mRoadster, you win. I went back to both comics archives, wrore down the actual links, and corrected the ones in my entry to match what l'd written down.Glammazon (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But none of it confers any notability to the subject, it has been rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 12:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:22:36, 25 April 2020 review of submission by Amplewebsol2019[edit]


Amplewebsol2019 (talk) 14:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amplewebsol2019, That is not an encyclopedia article, it looks hefted straight from a promotional website about Kumquats. I have no clue what made you decide to write about Kumquats, but if you'd like to explain, please leave a note on my talk page and I can try to help. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 05:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:26:59, 25 April 2020 review of draft by Funmilola Olojotuyi[edit]


Funmilola Olojotuyi (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Funmilola Olojotuyi, My draft article on El Nukoya has been tagged for speedy deletion for violating copyright policy. Kindly provide tips on correcting this and avoiding repeating future error. Funmilola Olojotuyi (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Errr... write things in your own words and don't copy and paste content. Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:30:07, 25 April 2020 review of submission by Johnpaterno[edit]


Hi I have some references that identify the legitimacy of the artist, can you please review the article again? Thank you Johnpaterno (talk) 14:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnpaterno, Very few YouTubers are notable, and your new sources do not establish notability. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 04:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:46:29, 25 April 2020 review of submission by JessFranborough[edit]


I have edited and resubmitted the article for Droeloe and I'm requesting a re-review. I have added in the article proof that Droeloe is notable and provided notable sources. Referencing the music notability criteria under criteria for musicians and ensembles, Droeloe meets the criteria of being the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable. Droeloe has also met the criteria of having performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, as Droeloe's song "Jump" was featured in an Apple Inc. advertisement for the Apple Watch Series 2 in July 2017. Droeloe has also met the music notability criteria as they have been on international concert tours. Is there any advice you can give me to have this article approved and published? Thank you. JessFranborough (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JessFranborough (talk) 20:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JessFranborough, Well the issue is that the article was deleted after a community discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Droeloe. Now in terms of notability, I wouldn't say that being in an apple watch commercial is sufficient for notability. If you want to reverse things, you would need to request a deletion review of the article. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 04:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:40:51, 25 April 2020 review of draft by Tentator[edit]


KylieTastic declined my submission with the comment: "See Wikipedia: Notability (academic journals)". I do not understand the meaning of this criticism. My article is about a notable and respected taxonomic journal which is one of the most famous among Russian journals on this subject. The journal is indexed in Scopus and a number of other databases. Wikipedia contains many articles about much less notable journals. Why was my submission declined? Tentator (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tentator It is a poor argument to cite other articles as a reason for yours to exist; see WP:OSE. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. It could be that those articles are inappropriate as well; we can only address what we know about.
Your draft offers no independent reliable sources with significant coverage to demonstrate that this journal meets the special definition of a notable academic journal. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]