Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 August 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 3 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 4[edit]

Request on 05:13:01, 4 August 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Prasmita[edit]


I am trying write wiki for BBC Sajha Sawal presenter. But I am not able to because of lack of reference. would you mind hep me where the error is so that I can fix it.

Prasmita (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Prasmita: You've not tried to improve the draft at all since it was declined on 30 May. Did you read the instructions in the pink box, which tell you how to add references? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:39:39, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Tom (LT)[edit]


I would like to:

  • Comment that I do not think this article should be accepted in its current or any form, as it:
    • Is very poorly written and will take a lot of time to convert into correct English
    • Contacts content that is already present throughout our Wikipedia
    • Does not actually reflect "Bowel Function" but a potpourri of other topics related to the digestive system and intestinal tract

I would also like some pointers as to how I can do this by myself in the future? It is difficult to work out where to start or how to do things on AfC so I'd love some pointers. Cheers --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tom (LT) (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:41:26, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Tom (LT)[edit]

Similar to the above comments I'd like to indicate that:

  • I think this draft can be moved to mainspace - it is suitable referenced and independently notable and yes, it is WP:NOTFINISHED but there's no need in my opinion for it to be in draft space (I will tinker when it's moved)

Tom (LT) (talk) 05:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:43:22, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Tom (LT)[edit]


Tom (LT) (talk) 05:43, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:34:22, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Crsweeney[edit]

My client has requested me to create this Wikipedia article to help support her name in the desired industry (performance based), thus a notable page enlisting her credential would be most sufficient. Please provide a reasonable explanation for the refusal of this particular Wikipedia page. Crsweeney (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Crsweeney: - you need to declare on your userpage your paid editing (and who it's for, and which article/draft you're editing) is before you make any further edits, otherwise you risk being blocked for undisclosed paid editing. Your phrasing of your request also causes some concern - we don't exist for marketing, we only record individuals already notable, rather than helping that along.
As an actor, the subject needs to play a significant role in multiple notable performances (top 3/4 characters, probably). It's rare for stage performances to demonstrate their notability - they'd need multiple reviews of a show Nosebagbear (talk) 16:01, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:34:47, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Kribondhar[edit]


Hi , I have made the necessary changes in the article and utmost care has been taken so that it complies with the wikipedia community standard. The article is regarding a Camping company which is providing first of its kind overlanding expedition experience to the travelers. So it is a notable topic and can be included in the wikipedia so that a number of people can actually learn about the new kind of adventure tourism trend in India. Hope the community accepts the article this time. Thank you With Regards Krishanu Dhar Kribondhar (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kribondhar: - it's not what a company does that makes it notable - it's how much reliable/independent secondary coverage it has. It has the news article, though half of that is a quote, so doesn't count. I wasn't able to find any content in the book (which you only linked to a google search) that related to the company. All the other sources weren't independent/secondary. I believe the previous reviewers are correct and that notability can't, yet, be established. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:08, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:08:55, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Justilvarghese[edit]


Justilvarghese (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Justilvarghese: - there aren't any sources, so the draft is automatically going to fail. Actors need significant roles in two notable films. They are mainly notable films, but many don't seem to list Ala (whether as Ala or Sunayana). She might be notable, but you need sources to clearly show that she is in a significant role in at least two of these films. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:32:31, 4 August 2019 review of submission by Jayanagas[edit]

This is regarding the article GrabOn. I have made necessary changes to it. Expecting a review and publish of it. Thanking you all. Jayanagas (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]