Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 February 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 8 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 9[edit]

Request on 06:28:16, 9 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Vishal vengerala[edit]



Vishal vengerala (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12:51:17, 9 February 2016 review of submission by Mangofast[edit]


- can you tell me how to correct the position of the CONTENTS box? (I used the wizard to create this new page but with too much cutting and pasting I somehow changed the layout sequence). - thank you!

Mangofast (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mangofast: I fixed the layout for you. The lead section should not have a section header. That's what threw off the automatically generated table of contents. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:09:36, 9 February 2016 review of submission by Mandymlall[edit]


I need help with my article which has been submitted to Articles for Creation. I have been unsuccessful at having my article approved for creation. Kindly advise what steps I can take to prevent this from reoccurring? Mandymlall (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Mandymlall (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:29:23, 9 February 2016 review of submission by MrSmooth31[edit]


Article was substantially altered to read more neutral and reliable from WP:NPOV and WP:CITEKILL. Subject and subject's notable work has been included in several publications/sources and was instructed to use the "best" overall sources rather than 3 or 4 different sources with similar information. Do not want to resubmit without second opinion. The original drafts included some information (technological, lighting science, etc) directly withdrawn from sources about the subject, and therefore did not read encyclopedic in tone. Looking for WP:NPOV critiques.MrSmooth31 (talk) 17:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:54:44, 9 February 2016 review of submission by MichaelVJBeattie[edit]


How do I ensure that the next reviewer thoroughly read new citations? MichaelVJBeattie (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:05:37, 9 February 2016 review of submission by Trogeadc[edit]


Trogeadc (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote an article for Philip Clements which was rejected for more sources, but had at least 4. What can I do to make sure the entry is published?